Why don't hospitals use faith healing?
If faith healing works, why do hospitals not use it?

1. Definition and Overview of the Concept of Faith Healing

Faith healing describes the belief and practice by which an individual’s physical ailments or diseases are healed through prayer, divine intervention, or reliance upon God’s power. In Scripture, faith does not imply blind trust without evidence; rather, it entails a confident expectation grounded in God’s revealed character (Hebrews 11:1). Faith healing, therefore, is the belief that God is both willing and able to heal, aligning the believer’s request with His sovereign will.

Biblically, both the Old and New Testaments contain numerous accounts of miraculous healings. For instance, the prophet Elisha healed Naaman the Syrian of leprosy (2 Kings 5:14), and Jesus Himself healed many who were blind, lame, and otherwise afflicted (Matthew 9:35). These examples frame the basis for faith healing’s presence through the centuries.

However, while Scripture presents healing as a divine mercy, it also showcases believers using medical means. Luke, one of the Gospel authors, was a physician (Colossians 4:14). This indicates that Scripture does not reject medical treatment; rather, the Bible upholds relying on God while also exercising wisdom and discernment in medical care.


2. Biblical Foundations for Healing

2.1 Old Testament Precedents

From the early narratives, Yahweh is recognized as a healer (Exodus 15:26). Miracles such as the healing of King Hezekiah (2 Kings 20:5–6) and Naaman’s cure from leprosy (2 Kings 5:14) affirm God’s sovereign ability over physical affliction.

2.2 Jesus’ Healings in the Gospels

The life of Christ provides a multitude of healing accounts, demonstrating both His divine power (Mark 5:34) and compassion (Matthew 14:14). These acts serve as a testament to His identity as the Son of God and affirm that God can and does heal.

2.3 Apostolic Examples in the Early Church

After Christ’s resurrection, the apostles continued to perform miracles through the Holy Spirit’s power (Acts 3:6–8). The biblical model affirms that spiritual gifts of healing exist, though they ultimately serve to glorify God rather than to elevate individuals (1 Corinthians 12:9).


3. Historical Accounts and Anecdotal Evidence

Throughout church history, there are records of miraculous healings through prayer. Early Christian writings, such as those of the Church Fathers, mention instances of physical cures attributed to God’s intervention. Present-day anecdotal reports of medically unexplained recoveries, as documented in Christian missions (e.g., accounts from Mozambique or remote regions where modern medicine is limited) further illustrate that such occurrences have not ceased in modern times.

Scholars have investigated reported miracles, including peer-reviewed clinical studies on the effects of prayer. Though methodologies vary, certain findings indicate possible correlations between prayer and medical improvement. These correlations do not function like a predictable formula, but they underscore that prayer can play a notable role in healing, complementing medical approaches.


4. Why Hospitals Generally Do Not Use Faith Healing as a Primary Method

4.1 The Nature of Medical Institutions

Hospitals are institutions rooted in measurable, testable, and often secular methodologies. Their role is to provide the best obtainable medical treatments, which are verifiable according to the scientific method. Though faith healing is real to many believers, it does not conform to the repeatability standards demanded by mainstream medical procedures.

4.2 Variability in Outcomes and the Sovereignty of God

Faith healing is not a guaranteed outcome in every situation. It involves multiple variables: the will of God (1 John 5:14), the faith of the participant, and God’s larger purposes. Consequently, the results cannot be consistently “controlled” or replicated in a laboratory setting. Hospitals and physicians typically require predictable and universally verifiable methods for meeting their obligations to all patients.

4.3 Emphasis on Integrative Care in Modern Practice

Many hospitals do recognize the importance of a patient’s spiritual well-being. It is not uncommon for healthcare facilities to provide chaplain services, prayer rooms, and encourage patients to seek spiritual support if they desire it. This integrative approach indicates that the medical establishment does not necessarily dismiss spiritual aspects but incorporates them in ways that do not conflict with established medical protocols.


5. Biblical Endorsement of Medical Means

Scripture neither condemns nor neglects medical treatment. Paul’s instruction for Timothy to use “a little wine” for medicinal reasons (1 Timothy 5:23) or the recognition of Luke as a beloved physician (Colossians 4:14) portray the acceptance of medical help. The Bible treats healthcare and faith as complementary, not opposing forces.

Moreover, archaeological evidence and ancient manuscripts highlight the advanced knowledge and practice of medicine that existed within biblical cultures (e.g., the discovery of ancient medical tools in Roman-era excavations that overlap the New Testament period). This historical context shows that believers often appreciated practical remedies alongside divine healing.


6. The Relationship Between Faith and Medicine

6.1 Synergistic Cooperation

Faith and medicine can coexist without conflict. A believer may pray for supernatural healing while simultaneously seeking the best medical care available. This synergy arises from the conviction that all healing ultimately comes from God, whether through miraculous interventions or through the expertise of doctors and medical research (cf. Psalm 103:2–3).

6.2 Personal Responsibility and Stewardship

Believers are exhorted to exercise stewardship over their bodies (1 Corinthians 6:19–20). Seeking medical assistance is an example of responsible care. It aligns with trusting God’s sovereign provision of knowledge and skill to doctors, surgeons, and researchers who have dedicated their lives to healing professions.


7. Miracles as Glorification of God’s Power

In the biblical record, miraculous healings are never ends in themselves but serve to glorify the Creator. Jesus’ healings showcased His divinity and the arrival of God’s kingdom (Matthew 12:28). Hospitals, shaped primarily by scientific methodology, rarely claim direct divine activity as part of regular practice. Nevertheless, individual testimonies of God’s healing power still occur within medical settings, often prompting worship and gratitude.

Miraculous healings, by their nature, reveal God’s sovereignty and eternal plan. The concept is not to do away with medicine; rather, it is to remind humanity that God ultimately remains the giver and sustainer of life.


8. Concluding Thoughts

Faith healing and conventional medicine take different approaches to addressing human ailments. Hospitals rely on quantifiable, systematic methods to diagnose, treat, and alleviate disease. Meanwhile, faith healing relies on divine intervention, the timing and manner of which rest in God’s hands.

Scripture validates both reliance upon God and the use of medical expertise. The reason hospitals do not uniformly employ faith healing as a standard procedure lies in the foundational differences of perspective, required reproducibility, and accountability measures within medical institutions. Yet many hospitals do provide avenues for patients to incorporate faith and prayer into their healing journey.

In practice, numerous believers cherish these coexisting paths—praying for divine healing, seeking medical help, and trusting God’s wisdom in the outcome. As stated in James 5:14–15, “Is any one of you sick? He should call the elders of the church to pray over him… And the prayer offered in faith will restore the one who is sick.” This counsel stands alongside the God-given resources found in hospitals and physicians, all working together according to His perfect will.

Why no divine design in DNA beyond evolution?
Top of Page
Top of Page