Topical Bible: Rashness: Josiah, in Fighting Against Pharaoh-Necho

◄ Rashness: Josiah, in Fighting Against Pharaoh-Necho ►

Topical Encyclopedia

Background and Context:

King Josiah of Judah is remembered as one of the most righteous kings in the history of Israel, known for his zealous reforms and dedication to the worship of Yahweh. His reign is detailed in the books of 2 Kings and 2 Chronicles, where he is depicted as a monarch who sought to restore the covenantal faithfulness of his people. However, despite his commendable devotion, Josiah's life ended in a moment of rashness that serves as a cautionary tale.

Biblical Account:

The account of Josiah's rashness is found in 2 Chronicles 35:20-24. After Josiah had completed his religious reforms and the celebration of the Passover, Pharaoh Necho of Egypt marched to the Euphrates River to assist the Assyrians against the rising power of Babylon. Necho's path took him through the territory of Judah, prompting Josiah to confront him at Megiddo.

Despite Necho's explicit message, which he claimed was from God, urging Josiah not to interfere—"What have I to do with you, king of Judah? I am not coming against you this day, but against the house with which I am at war. God has told me to hurry; so stop opposing God, who is with me, or He will destroy you" (2 Chronicles 35:21)—Josiah disguised himself and went into battle against Necho.

Analysis of Rashness:

Josiah's decision to engage Pharaoh Necho was marked by a lack of discernment and an impulsive disregard for divine warning. His actions can be seen as rash for several reasons:

1. Ignoring Divine Warning: Josiah failed to heed the warning delivered by Necho, who claimed to be acting under divine instruction. This disregard for a potential message from God, even through a foreign king, highlights a moment of spiritual insensitivity.

2. Disguising Himself: By disguising himself, Josiah demonstrated a lack of transparency and a willingness to rely on human cunning rather than seeking divine guidance. This act of subterfuge suggests a departure from his usual reliance on God.

3. Unnecessary Conflict: Josiah's decision to engage in battle was unnecessary, as Necho's campaign was not directed against Judah. This unnecessary confrontation led to his untimely death, depriving Judah of a godly leader.

4. Failure to Seek God: Unlike previous instances where Josiah sought the Lord's guidance, there is no record of him consulting God before this battle. This omission underscores the rashness of his decision.

Consequences:

Josiah's rashness resulted in his death at Megiddo, as he was struck by archers and later died in Jerusalem (2 Chronicles 35:23-24). His death marked the end of a period of religious reform and stability in Judah, leading to a rapid decline under his successors. The loss of Josiah was deeply mourned by the nation, as reflected in the lamentations composed by the prophet Jeremiah (2 Chronicles 35:25).

Theological Implications:

Josiah's rashness serves as a sobering reminder of the importance of seeking God's guidance and exercising discernment, even for those who are otherwise faithful. It illustrates the potential consequences of acting impulsively and the need for humility in recognizing divine messages, regardless of their source.

Nave's Topical Index

2 Chronicles 35:20-24
After all this, when Josiah had prepared the temple, Necho king of Egypt came up to fight against Charchemish by Euphrates: and Josiah went out against him.
Nave's Topical Index