1 Kings 7:19's link to Israel's art?
How does 1 Kings 7:19 reflect the artistic culture of ancient Israel?

Text of 1 Kings 7:19

“The capitals on the tops of the pillars in the portico were shaped like lilies, four cubits high.”


Immediate Architectural Setting

1 Kings 7 describes the construction of Solomon’s palace complex and the temple furnishings. Verses 15–22 focus on two free-standing bronze pillars—Jachin and Boaz—crafted by the master metal-worker Hiram of Tyre (1 Kings 7:13–14). Verse 19 narrows in on the capitals crowning those pillars, located “in the portico” (הָאוּלָם, ha-’ûlām), the temple’s front porch. Each capital measured “four cubits” (≈ 6 ft / 1.8 m) in height, giving the porch a striking vertical emphasis visible from great distance.


Description of the Lily Capitals

The capitals were “shaped like lilies” (שׁוּשַׁנִּים, shûshanîm). Bronze was cast, hammered, and chased to display open floral calyxes. Below the lilies, verses 17–18 note latticework and rows of pomegranates. Such layered decoration turned static metal into living, organic forms.


Symbolism of the Lily Motif

1. Purity and Provision. Lilies symbolize beauty bestowed by God (Matthew 6:28–29). Songs 2:1 speaks of the “lily of the valleys,” and Hosea 14:5 promises Israel will “blossom like the lily.”

2. Life out of Water. Lilies grow from watery soil; bronze pillars stood beside the temple’s great water sources (the sea and basins, 1 Kings 7:23–39), hinting at creation themes—life emerging from primal waters (Genesis 1:9–11).

3. Royal Splendor. Ancient Near Eastern art linked lilies with royalty. Their placement on the temple emphasized Yahweh’s kingship.


Artisan Skill and Divine Endowment

The text twice highlights Hiram’s pedigree: “filled with wisdom, understanding, and skill in all kinds of bronze work” (1 Kings 7:14 cf. Exodus 31:3–5). Artistic excellence is portrayed as a Spirit-enabled gift. The use of lost-wax casting for pieces of this scale presupposes large clay molds and high-temperature charcoal furnaces, confirmed by metallurgical slag and tuyères unearthed at Timna and Punon, both active in the 10th century BC.


Intercultural Influences and Covenant Distinctives

Phoenician artisanship supplied technique, yet the iconography remained non-idolatrous. Whereas Tyrian temples displayed anthropomorphic deities, Solomon employed abstract flora. The text thus evidences Israel’s ability to absorb technical expertise while maintaining theological purity (Exodus 20:4). No syncretistic images of Baal or Melqart appear; only God-created lilies adorn His house.


Archaeological Corroborations of Israelite Artistry

• Excavations at Khirbet Qeiyafa (10th century BC) yielded limestone shrine models with recessed doorways and triglyph frames matching the temple’s architectural vocabulary (1 Kings 6:31–33).

• Samaria ivory plaques (9th-8th century BC) display lotus and lily motifs analogous to the bronze capitals, indicating continuity in elite Israelite art.

• A fragment of a bronze proto-Ionic capital from Hazor (10th century BC) shows a stylized lily comparable to Solomon’s design, supporting the biblical chronology of ornate capitals in the United Monarchy.


Comparative Scriptural Parallels

• The menorah’s branches and “calyxes shaped like almond blossoms” (Exodus 25:31–34) prove flora had long decorated sacred objects.

• Capitals “finished in a lily pattern” reappear in 1 Kings 7:22 and 2 Chronicles 4:5, reinforcing authorial consistency.

• Temple imagery echoes Edenic abundance—cherubim, palm trees, and open flowers (1 Kings 6:29)—reminding worshipers of restored fellowship with God.


Theological Implications of Aesthetic Beauty

Beauty is not superfluous; it draws hearts upward. David desired to “gaze on the beauty of the LORD” (Psalm 27:4). By integrating creation motifs into architecture, Israel confessed that the Creator of natural lilies also presided in the sanctuary. Artistic craft thus became doxology, fulfilling humanity’s mandate to “cultivate and keep” creation (Genesis 2:15) and to “declare His glory among the nations” (Psalm 96:3).


Conservative Chronology and Historical Reliability

A 10th-century date fits the biblical timeline from creation to Abraham (approx. 2000 BC) to the Exodus (mid-15th century BC) to Solomon’s reign (970–930 BC). Carbon-14 dates from the City of David’s Stepped Stone Structure align with Iron IIA (late 11th–10th centuries BC), corroborating a robust centralized kingdom capable of monumental bronze work, countering minimalist claims of a later composition.


Pastoral and Devotional Application

Believers today are “living stones” (1 Peter 2:5), called to reflect God’s beauty. The lily capitals remind the church that craftsmanship, music, and all creative endeavors can and should magnify the risen Christ, who clothes the fields with lilies and His people with righteousness.


Summary

1 Kings 7:19 captures ancient Israel’s artistic culture as technologically advanced, theologically guided, and aesthetically rich. The lily-shaped capitals showcase skilled metallurgy, natural symbolism, and covenant faithfulness, providing archaeological, literary, and theological testimony that Israel’s art—rooted in revelation—sought to glorify the Creator in the heart of national worship.

What is the significance of the lily design in 1 Kings 7:19 for Solomon's temple?
Top of Page
Top of Page