How does Acts 26:25 challenge the perception of faith as irrational? Text Of Acts 26:25 “But Paul replied, ‘I am not insane, most excellent Festus; I am speaking words of truth and reason.’” Immediate Historical Setting Paul stands in Caesarea-Maritima under Roman custody, defending himself before Governor Festus and King Agrippa II (Acts 25–26). Festus, unfamiliar with Jewish messianic claims, has just shouted, “You are out of your mind, Paul! Your great learning is driving you to madness” (26:24). Paul immediately refutes the charge of irrationality, asserting that his message—centered on the death and physical resurrection of Jesus (26:22-23)—is both “truth” (alētheia) and “reason” (sōphrosynē, lit. sound-mindedness). The Greek Vocabulary: Alētheia Και Sōphrosynē • Alētheia: factual, objective reality (cf. John 18:37). • Sōphrosynē: disciplined thought, sanity, prudence. Classical writers (e.g., Aristotle, Nicomachean Ethics II.4) use it for intellectual self-control; Luke chooses a term recognized by Greco-Roman auditors to underscore mental sobriety. Paul therefore frames Christian proclamation inside the epistemic categories prized by his audience: veracity and rational coherence. Scriptural Pattern Of Reasoned Faith • Isaiah 1:18 “Come now, let us reason together, says the LORD.” • Luke 1:3 uses “akribeia” (careful investigation) for the gospel’s compilation. • 1 Peter 3:15 commands believers to give a “reason” (logos) for their hope. Acts 26:25 falls within this wider biblical insistence that faith appeals to evidence, not credulity. Paul’S Evidential Argument In Acts 26 1. Eyewitness Testimony—Paul reminds Agrippa that these events “were not done in a corner” (26:26). The resurrection appearances occurred publicly (cf. 1 Corinthians 15:3-8 early creed dated < 5 years after the cross; Habermas, Minimal Facts). 2. Prophetic Fulfilment—“The prophets and Moses said this would happen” (26:22-23), aligning historical fact with Scripture. 3. Personal Experience—The Damascus-road encounter (26:13-15) provides direct empirical data to Paul, confirmed by others (Acts 9:7; 22:9). 4. Corroboration by Miracle—Acts testifies to healings (e.g., 28:8-9 on Malta) witnessed by pagans and recorded by Luke the physician, a detail-oriented historian whose medical terminology matches 1st-century usage (cf. Colin Hemer, “Historical Reliability of Acts,” ch. 4). Philosophical Implications: Faith As Reasonable Trust Acts 26:25 dismantles the false dichotomy between faith and reason. • Epistemology: Christian belief rests on historical events open to investigation (Luke 1:1-4). • Inference to Best Explanation: The empty tomb, post-mortem appearances, and transformation of skeptics (James, Paul) make resurrection the most coherent account (Craig, Reasonable Faith, ch. 8). • Behavioral Science: Humans form beliefs by weighing testimony, experience, and explanatory scope; biblical faith aligns with these cognitive processes, not against them. Paul’S Self-Control As Counter-Evidence To “Madness” Throughout the defense Paul speaks respectfully (26:3), orderly (26:1-29), and coherently, embodying Proverbs 25:28’s ideal of ruled spirit. His composure under wrongful imprisonment exemplifies 2 Timothy 1:7—“a spirit not of fear but of power, love, and self-control”—discrediting Festus’s accusation psychologically. Consistency With A Young-Earth, Design-Oriented Worldview If creation is intelligently designed (Romans 1:20) and history unfolds by divine providence (Daniel 2:21), then the resurrection is a coherent extension of God’s regular and special acts. A Designer who engineers life at the cellular level (Meyer, Signature in the Cell) and sustains the cosmos (Colossians 1:17) is neither limited nor irrational in reanimating a crucified body. Geological data consistent with catastrophic Flood processes (e.g., polystrate fossils in the Joggins Formation) reinforce Scripture’s reliability, supporting Paul’s confidence in the total biblical narrative. Modern Parallels Of Rational Testimony • Legal scholar Simon Greenleaf concluded the resurrection testimony would stand in court (Testimony of the Evangelists, 1846). • Contemporary medically verified healings (e.g., peer-reviewed Mozambique study, Brown & Miller, Southern Medical Journal 2010) show God still acts in publicly observable ways, mirroring Acts’ pattern. Such cases sustain Paul’s claim that Christian proclamation is “truth and reason.” Pastoral And Evangelistic Application • Encourage seekers to examine the primary documents (Gospels, 1 Corinthians 15 creed) as Pliny, Tacitus, and Josephus corroborate the crucifixion and growth of the early church. • Challenge the skeptic to consider whether “madness” better describes an unwillingness to confront inconvenient evidence (Romans 1:18) than the apostolic witness. Conclusion Acts 26:25 positions Christian faith squarely within the domain of clear-headed rationality. By coupling objective “truth” with disciplined “reason,” Paul models an intellectually robust, evidentially anchored, historically informed trust in the risen Christ— dismantling the modern caricature of faith as irrational and inviting every listener to “become what he is, except for these chains” (26:29). |
    |