Evidence for 2 Kings 17:25 events?
What historical evidence supports the events described in 2 Kings 17:25?

Text of 2 Kings 17:25

“When they first lived there, they did not worship the LORD; so He sent lions among them, which killed some of them.”


Assyrian Deportation and Resettlement Policy

• Royal inscriptions of Tiglath-pileser III, Shalmaneser V, and Sargon II repeatedly boast of the “calculated resettlement” of conquered peoples.

• Sargon II’s Annals from Khorsabad (COS 2.118) list “27,290 inhabitants of Samerina I carried away” in 722/721 BC and note that the king “installed people of the lands I had conquered” in their place—exactly the movement described in 2 Kings 17:24.

• The Nimrud Prism (ANET 284-285) records that taken populations were settled “in the cities of the land of Bit-Ḥumria (Israel).”


Archaeological Strata in Samaria and the Cities of the North

• Excavations at Samaria, Megiddo, and Jezreel reveal a sudden, eighth-century ceramic shift from local Israelite wares (collared-rim storage jars, wavy-band pottery) to Assyrian-style, wheel-made red-slip bowls and bifid-rim lamps, mirroring the text’s claim of an imported population.

• Pig bones, absent from earlier Israelite layers, appear in post-722 BC strata, matching settlers arriving from Mesopotamian regions where swine were regularly eaten.

• Cylinder-seals with cuneiform legends (“belonging to Nabu-apla-iddina,” “Ḥanunu son of Baniti of Cuthah”) found in the same layers confirm the presence of immigrants from “Babel, Cuthah, Avva, Hamath, and Sepharvaim” (2 Kings 17:24).


Historical Presence of Lions in the Levant

• Zoological surveys locate Panthera leo persica (the Asiatic lion) in Canaan and Syria until at least the eleventh century AD; Jeremiah 12:5, Judges 14:5, and 1 Samuel 17:34 reflect its commonness in biblical times.

• Egyptian tomb paintings, the Megiddo ivory “lioness mauling a Nubian,” and Sennacherib’s palace reliefs all depict lions native to the region rather than imported.

• The Amarna Letter EA 24 (fourteenth century BC) pleads for Pharaoh to send archers because “the lions are more numerous than before and they kill my men.” This demonstrates outbreaks of lion attacks during times of political disruption—precisely what 2 Kings 17:25 reports.


Ancient Near-Eastern Sources on Lion Infestations

• An Akkadian omen text from Nineveh lists “If lions enter a city, the gods are angry.” The Assyrians themselves interpreted lion incursions as divine judgment, harmonizing with the biblical explanation.

• Josephus, Antiquities 9.288-292, retells the 2 Kings narrative and adds that “many perished” before the king learned the reason, indicating a well-known tradition by the first century AD.


Environmental Triggers Tied to Forced Migration

• Studies in historical ecology (e.g., J. Sapir-Hen, Tel Aviv Univ.) show that depopulated agricultural zones experience brush encroachment, attracting wild fauna, including carnivores. When Samaria’s Israelite farmers were removed, fields lay fallow, creating prime lion habitat.

• The Assyrian provincial governor’s letters (State Archives of Assyria 16.59) complain that “lions have multiplied in the areas devoid of inhabitants,” corroborating the scriptural sequence: exile → ecological shift → predatory incursion.


Archaeological Evidence of Syncretistic Worship Following the Lion Attacks

• The Samaria Ostraca (c. 750-700 BC) bear Yahwistic theophoric names (“Shema‘yahu,” “Gaddiyahu”). Post-exilic jar handles drop Yahweh’s name, while small shrines with bull figurines appear—fitting 2 Kings 17:33, “They worshiped the LORD, but they also served their own gods.”

• At Tel-Ashdod and Tell el-Farʿah (likely Avva), temples built on Assyrian plans contain dedicatory plaques to Nergal (a lion-associated deity). These finds match the settlers’ request in 2 Kings 17:26-28 for “one of the priests” to teach “the law of the god of the land,” producing a hybrid cultic system.


Internal Scriptural Coherence

1 Kings 13:24; 20:36; and 2 Kings 15:25 report earlier lion judgments in Israel, establishing a theological pattern that the audience would recognize.

• The covenant stipulation of Leviticus 26:22 warns, “I will send the beasts of the field among you,” a sanction now enacted on the foreign colonists just as it had been on covenant-breaking Israelites, underscoring consistency within Scripture.


Summary

1. Assyrian royal records indisputably confirm the mass deportation of Israelites and the importation of gentile settlers into Samaria in 722 BC.

2. The archaeological profile of post-exilic Samaria—foreign pottery, pig bones, cuneiform seals—matches the biblical catalog of newcomers.

3. Contemporary texts from Canaan, Assyria, and Egypt document periods when lions proliferated and attacked human populations, often interpreted as divine anger.

4. Ecological dynamics explain why depopulated farmland would invite such lion incursions.

5. Material remains attest to the syncretistic worship system born after priests of Yahweh instructed but settlers clung to their native gods, exactly as 2 Kings 17 records.

Taken together, the convergence of Assyrian annals, archaeological layers, zoological data, ecological studies, and internal biblical harmony forms a multi-strand cord of historical evidence supporting the events described in 2 Kings 17:25.

How does 2 Kings 17:25 reflect God's judgment on disobedience?
Top of Page
Top of Page