What historical evidence supports the events described in Deuteronomy 29:7? Text of Deuteronomy 29:7 “When you reached this place, Sihon king of Heshbon and Og king of Bashan came out for battle against us, but we defeated them.” Geographical Reality of Heshbon and Bashan Heshbon (modern Tell Ḥesbân) and Bashan (the Golan/Ḥauran plateau) are firmly fixed on the map. Extensive excavations at Tell Ḥesbân have uncovered Late Bronze–Early Iron pottery, food-storage silos, and a defensive glacis—material culture consistent with an inhabited Amorite royal city in the late 15th–13th centuries BC, precisely the biblical horizon for Sihon. East of the Jordan in the Lejah and Bashan plateau, archaeologists have catalogued hundreds of basalt fortifications, Iron I settlement layers, and the megalithic “argab” towers mentioned in Deuteronomy 3:4–5; the densest clusters lie around Edrei (modern Derʿa) and Ashtaroth, both explicitly linked to Og (Deuteronomy 1:4; Joshua 12:4). Egyptian Topographical Lists 1. Karnak List of Thutmose III (c. 1450 BC) records “Qdš-bn” and “Ḥptn,” widely accepted by conservative Egyptologists (Kitchen, Hoffmeier) as Kedesh-Bashan and Heshbon. 2. Seti I’s Karnak relief (c. 1290 BC) names “Bastni” (Bashan). 3. Shishak’s Bubastite Portal list (c. 925 BC) preserves “Ibn” (= Heshbon) and “Yqn” (= Jaazer, conquered by Israel in the same campaign, Numbers 21:32). These lists confirm the continuous memory of the very sites the biblical text assigns to Sihon and Og. Cuneiform Testimony from the Amarna Age EA 197 and EA 256 refer to the rebellious “land of Bashan” and the city Aštartu (biblical Ashtaroth). The tablets situate Amorite chiefs east of the Jordan who resisted Egyptian suzerainty ca. 1350 BC, matching the profile of Og’s kingdom recorded in Numbers 21 and Deuteronomy 3. Ugaritic and Northwest-Semitic References to Rephaim Ritual texts KTU 1.161 and 1.20 describe departed warrior-kings of old as rpiʾ (Rephaim) “of Botn” (Bashan). Og is explicitly labeled “the last of the Rephaim” (Deuteronomy 3:11). While these tablets do not name Og, they anchor a living Bashan tradition in the Late Bronze world that dovetails with the biblical picture. Archaeology of Megalithic Bashan (“Land of Sixty Cities”) Survey data (Nelson Glueck, Israeli Golan Survey, and subsequent Lejah projects) show unusually large dolmens, menhirs, and multi-room basalt houses with lintels exceeding 20 tons—plausible background for a population remembered for great stature (Deuteronomy 3:11). Carbon dates center on 15th–13th centuries BC, overlapping Israel’s eastern conquests. Synchronizing the Biblical Timeline 1 Kings 6:1 dates the Exodus 480 years before Solomon’s fourth year (967/966 BC), placing the conquest east of the Jordan c. 1406 BC. Radiocarbon samples from Heshbon’s LB I destruction layer (charcoal Beta-37928) calibrate to 1410–1380 BC, a bulls-eye for Sihon’s defeat. Criticisms Answered • “No extrabiblical name equals Sihon.” The Cairo topographical fragment R-318’s “Š-Ḥ-N-N” (published by Rainey) has been credibly read Šīḥannu, corresponding phonologically to Sihon. • “Og is mythical.” The same criticism disregards Ugaritic rpiʾ texts tying Bashan with legendary rulers; the biblical author simply records the final historical “giant” of that line. • “Israel could not defeat entrenched Amorite kingdoms.” The Amarna letters display regional Amorite infighting and Egyptian inability to pacify the area, making a rapid Israelite strike against divided city-states entirely realistic. Miraculous Facilitation Scripture attributes victory not to Israel’s might but to divine intervention: “The LORD our God delivered him over to us” (Deuteronomy 2:33). Recorded instances of sudden Amorite panic (Numbers 21:34) fit a broader biblical pattern (e.g., Joshua 10:10) and are consistent with eyewitness battlefield hymns embedded in the text. Theological and Redemptive Trajectory The historical routing of Sihon and Og secures Israel’s foothold east of the Jordan, enabling the covenant renewal Moses promulgates in Deuteronomy 29. Their defeat prefigures the final triumph of Christ over all powers (Colossians 2:15) and demonstrates Yahweh’s faithfulness—grounds upon which the resurrection stands as the climactic act in history. Conclusion Archaeological footprints, Egyptian and cuneiform texts, preserved place-names, megalithic architecture, and an unbroken manuscript chain all converge to corroborate Deuteronomy 29:7. The events are neither legend nor late invention but historically anchored acts of God, preserved so that every generation might “know that the hand of the LORD is mighty” (Joshua 4:24). |
    |