How does Matthew 5:39 align with the concept of justice and self-defense? Text of the Passage “But I tell you not to resist an evil person. If someone slaps you on your right cheek, turn to him the other also.” (Matthew 5:39) Immediate Context: Lex Talionis Re-interpreted Matthew 5:38 cites the Mosaic lex talionis—“eye for eye and tooth for tooth.” In the Torah this principle limited retaliation, ensuring proportional justice (Exodus 21:24). Jesus is not abolishing judicial equity; He is addressing private vengeance. The Greek verb ἀνθίστημι (anthistēmi, “to resist, oppose with force”) shows the focus is personal retaliation, not lawful courts or protecting the innocent. Personal Retaliation versus Civil Justice Scripture consistently distinguishes the sphere of individual conduct from the sphere of civil authority: • Romans 12:19 commands believers to leave vengeance to God. • Romans 13:1-4 assigns government the divine task of wielding the sword “to bring punishment on the wrongdoer.” Thus Matthew 5:39 restrains the impulse to repay insult with insult while fully allowing society to prosecute wrongdoing. Self-Defense in the Canonical Witness 1. Protection of life is assumed lawful. “If a thief is caught in the act of breaking in and is struck and killed, no one shall be guilty of bloodshed” (Exodus 22:2). 2. Nehemiah armed laborers while rebuilding Jerusalem (Nehemiah 4:13-18). 3. Jesus affirmed legitimate preparedness: “the one who has no sword, let him sell his cloak and buy one” (Luke 22:36). 4. Paul exercised Roman legal rights to avoid unjust scourging (Acts 22:25). These passages demonstrate that defending oneself or others from lethal threat is not condemned; what is forbidden is vindictive retaliation. The Nature of the “Slap” A slap on the right cheek in first-century Judea signified a back-handed insult, not an attempted murder. Jesus calls His followers to absorb shame without escalation, mirroring His own response: “When He was maligned, He did not retaliate” (1 Peter 2:23). Justice, Love, and the Image of God Human dignity flows from bearing God’s image (Genesis 1:27). Love of neighbor therefore entails: • Refusing personal revenge that degrades another image-bearer. • Protecting the vulnerable when their lives are threatened (Proverbs 24:11). Matthew 5:39 guards the first duty; passages on defense guard the second. Both uphold divine justice and human worth. Government’s God-Ordained Role Romans 13:4: “For he is God’s servant for your good. But if you do wrong, be afraid, for he does not bear the sword in vain.” Civil institutions are commissioned to apply force judiciously so individuals need not. Christian citizens may therefore appeal to courts, police, or military service without violating Matthew 5:39. Historical Christian Interpretation • Early church writers (e.g., Tertullian, Apology 37) emphasized non-retaliation but acknowledged magistrates’ authority. • Augustine’s just-war formulation distinguished interior disposition (love) from external action (defense of the innocent). • Reformers upheld lawful self-defense while condemning private vendetta. Practical Synthesis 1. Personal Insults → Absorb, forgive, entrust justice to God. 2. Threats to Life → If possible, flee (Matthew 10:23); if unavoidable, defensive action is permissible, aiming to neutralize, not avenge. 3. Civil Crimes → Report to authorities; participate in due process. 4. Attitude → Maintain love, pray for enemies (Matthew 5:44). Conclusion Matthew 5:39 curbs personal revenge, calling believers to radical mercy, while Scripture as a whole affirms righteous justice and protective self-defense. Harmonized, these teachings reflect God’s character—patient toward sinners yet protective of the innocent—and they direct Christians to glorify Him through meekness of heart and responsible guardianship of human life. |
    |