Does "turn the other cheek" in Matthew 5:39 promote passivity in the face of evil? Historical-Cultural Setting First-century Judaea employed the “backhand slap” as a calculated insult. A right-handed aggressor striking the “right cheek” necessarily uses the back of the hand, signaling contempt more than bodily harm. Roman law fined such an affront precisely double a frontal slap (Digest 47.10.15). Jesus addresses retaliatory instinct when honor is attacked, not a life-threatening assault. The Lex Talionis Transformed The Mosaic “eye for eye” (Exodus 21:24; Leviticus 24:19-20; Deuteronomy 19:21) placed a ceiling on retaliation, preventing vendetta. Jesus fulfils the Torah (Matthew 5:17) by moving the law from external limit to internal disposition: love replaces retribution. Scope: Personal Insult Vs. Self-Defense 1. Personal grievances: The context lists four examples (cheek, cloak, mile, borrowing) that diminish dignity or property but do not imperil life. 2. Bodily protection: Scripture sanctions defending the vulnerable (Proverbs 24:11; Nehemiah 4:14). Jesus Himself evades murder attempts (Luke 4:30; John 8:59) and permits armed watch (Luke 22:36-38) while forbidding vengeance (Matthew 26:52). 3. Civil justice: God ordains magistrates “to bear the sword” (Romans 13:1-4). Turning the cheek is not anarchy; it relinquishes personal vengeance while upholding public order. Theological Themes • Divine Character: Yahweh is “slow to anger” (Exodus 34:6). The disciple mirrors the Father’s kindness (Matthew 5:45). • Cruciform Love: The command anticipates the Cross where Jesus “when He was reviled, He did not retaliate” (1 Peter 2:23). • Overcoming Evil with Good: Paul echoes the principle (Romans 12:17-21), quoting Proverbs 25:21-22. Non-retaliation is moral offense, not retreat, disarming evil by exposing its emptiness. Harmonization With The Whole Canon • Old Testament Parallels: Proverbs 20:22; 24:29 forbid payback. Job (Job 31:29-30) embodies it. • New Testament Parallels: Luke 6:29-30; 1 Corinthians 6:7; James 5:6. • Complementarity, not contradiction: Self-sacrificial mercy coexists with legitimate defense of others (Psalm 82:3-4). Jesus’ Own Example Before Annas, a temple officer struck Jesus; He did not literally offer another cheek yet submitted without retaliation, calmly appealing to lawful process (John 18:22-23). At Calvary He prayed, “Father, forgive them” (Luke 23:34). The ethic is principled, not mechanical. Apostolic Practice • Stephen forgave his murderers (Acts 7:60). • Paul forwent legal revenge for beatings (Acts 16:37–40) yet asserted civil rights when they protected the mission (Acts 22:25). The pattern: accept personal loss; leverage legal means for gospel advance, never for spite. Civil Authority, War, And Policing Turning the cheek speaks to interpersonal relations, not to the vocation of soldiers or police. Centurions believe in Christ without being told to lay down arms (Matthew 8:10; Acts 10). Government’s duty to restrain evil (Romans 13) stands intact. Moral Courage, Not Passivity Non-retaliation demands strength: • Psychological research on aggression regulation shows deliberate inhibition requires greater prefrontal engagement than impulsive counterstrike. • History: Corrie ten Boom forgiving a camp guard; believers in the Sudan greeting tormentors with aid—actions that transformed persecutors, illustrating active resistance through grace. Common Objections Answered 1. “It invites abuse.” – Jesus advocates wise endurance, not enabling criminality. Confrontation (Matthew 18:15-17), flight (Matthew 10:23), self-defense of innocents, and appeal to law remain. 2. “It contradicts just war.” – The doctrine concerns personal retaliation; Scripture elsewhere frames criteria for defensive war (Deuteronomy 20; Augustine’s jus ad bellum). 3. “It hampers evangelism under persecution.” – Early church growth under Roman brutality demonstrates opposite; Tertullian observed, “The blood of Christians is seed.” Pastoral And Behavioral Implications • Heart Check: Examine motive—protection or vengeance? • Practical Steps: Pause, pray, bless the offender verbally (Luke 6:28), seek reconciliation, involve authorities when others are endangered. • Witness: Radical grace raises questions leading to gospel conversations (1 Peter 3:14-15). Conclusion “Turn the other cheek” forbids personal revenge, not lawful defense or moral resistance. It calls believers to proactive, courageous love that mirrors Christ, confronts evil’s dehumanizing cycle, and trusts God’s ultimate justice. Far from passive, it is the powerful posture of a redeemed heart liberated by the resurrected Lord. |
    |