What do "high places" mean in 2 Chron 14:5?
What do the high places represent in 2 Chronicles 14:5?

Definition and Etymology

The term “high places” translates the Hebrew word bamot (sing. bamah), literally “elevated sites.” In Scripture the word describes any man-made or natural elevation dedicated to sacrificial or cultic activity (Numbers 22:41; Isaiah 36:7). By the time of King Asa (c. 911–870 BC), bamot had become shorthand for unauthorized worship centers scattered throughout Judah and Israel.


Cultural and Religious Background

Canaanite religions customarily met the gods on hilltops, believing height facilitated communion with the divine. Archaeological digs at Tel Dan, Megiddo, and Hazor have uncovered stepped platforms, standing stones, and animal-bone deposits that match the biblical description of high-place ritual (incense, libations, and burnt offerings). A Moabite inscription (Mesha Stele, l. 3–5) likewise celebrates the dedication of a bamah to Chemosh, confirming the practice across the Levant.


Biblical Pattern of High-Place Worship

1. Pre-Conquest: Balaam is taken to “the high places of Baal” (Numbers 22:41).

2. Conquest Mandate: “You must tear down their altars…on the high mountains” (Deuteronomy 12:2-3).

3. Monarchy Compromise: Solomon builds bamot for foreign deities (1 Kings 11:7).

4. Divided Kingdom: Most kings “did what was right…yet the high places were not removed” (1 Kings 15:14).

5. Reformations: Hezekiah (2 Kings 18:4) and Josiah (2 Kings 23) eradicate them; Asa begins the pattern (2 Chronicles 14:3-5).


Immediate Context in 2 Chronicles 14:5

“He also removed the high places and the incense altars from all the cities of Judah, and under him the kingdom was at peace.”

Asa’s purge forms a couplet with verse 4 (“He commanded Judah to seek the LORD, the God of their fathers, and to observe the Law and the commandment”). High-place removal is thus both negative (eliminating idolatry) and positive (restoring covenant fidelity). The Chronicler links this obedience to Yahweh’s gift of šālôm (peace, v. 5), anticipating the Deuteronomic promise that faithfulness yields rest in the land (Deuteronomy 12:10).


Theological Significance

1. Covenant Centralization: The Law stipulates a singular “place the LORD your God will choose” (Deuteronomy 12:5). High places represented rebellion against God’s chosen locus—first Shiloh, then Jerusalem’s temple (1 Kings 9:3).

2. Purity of Worship: Bamot fostered syncretism. Excavations at Arad show a two-standing-stone shrine within an Israelite fortress—evidence that even Yahwist sites easily drifted toward a compromised iconography.

3. Kingship under Torah: Chronicles evaluates rulers by their treatment of high places. Asa’s removal testifies that true authority submits to divine law rather than popular religious custom.

4. Typological Foreshadowing: The high-place motif anticipates Christ, the ultimate sanctified meeting-place between God and man (John 4:21-24; Hebrews 10:19-22). As Asa cleared Judah’s landscape, Jesus clears the human heart, fulfilling the temple ideal in Himself.


Archaeological and Extra-Biblical Corroboration

• Tel Dan’s open-air bamah (9th cent. BC) matches biblical chronology; its four-horned altar fragments mirror Levitical design, illustrating how counterfeit worship mimicked true ritual.

• The Kuntillet Ajrud inscriptions (“Yahweh of Teman and his Asherah”) show that Israelites indeed mixed Yahweh with Canaanite symbols on high places—a historical validation of the Chronicler’s concern.

• Geochemical analyses of incense residues from Ein Gedi caves confirm the use of frankincense and myrrh, substances repeatedly paired with high-place worship (2 Chronicles 26:19).


Consequences of Retaining High Places

Biblical history charts three outcomes when bamot persisted:

1. Moral Degradation (2 Chronicles 28:4, Ahaz’s apostasy).

2. Political Instability (2 Kings 21–24, leading to Babylonian exile).

3. Divine Judgment (Ezekiel 6:3-6—high places become slaughter sites).


Modern Application

High places symbolize any self-appointed pathway to the divine that bypasses God’s revealed provision. Just as Asa dismantled Judah’s altars, disciples today must tear down intellectual, moral, or cultural elevations that rival the supremacy of Christ (2 Colossians 10:4-5).


Summary Definition

In 2 Chronicles 14:5 high places represent unauthorized, syncretistic worship centers—physical elevations that embodied covenant infidelity. Asa’s removal of them demonstrates allegiance to Mosaic law, prefigures later reforms, and foreshadows the exclusive mediatorship of Christ.

Why did Asa remove the high places in 2 Chronicles 14:5?
Top of Page
Top of Page