What is the meaning of 2 Corinthians 1:17? When I planned this Paul is referring to his earlier intention to visit Corinth twice—once on his way to Macedonia and again on his way back (2 Corinthians 1:15-16; 1 Corinthians 16:5-7). • His planning sprang from genuine pastoral concern, not convenience. • Scripture shows that wise planning is a godly practice (Proverbs 16:3; Psalm 37:5), so Paul’s advance notice was an act of love and responsibility toward the church. • Like Nehemiah who first surveyed Jerusalem before rebuilding (Nehemiah 2:11-15), Paul sized up the situation so his visit would build, not burden, the believers. Did I do it carelessly? “When I planned this, did I do it carelessly?” (2 Corinthians 1:17a). • Paul rejects the idea that his change of itinerary meant sloppy leadership. The diligent weigh their steps (Proverbs 21:5; Luke 14:28). • His subsequent decision to delay came from a desire to spare the Corinthians a painful confrontation (2 Corinthians 1:23-24). • James 1:19 reminds believers to be “slow to speak” and, by extension, deliberate in action. Paul embodies that measured approach here. Or do I make my plans by human standards He refuses to operate from mere fleshly impulses (2 Corinthians 1:17b). • “Human standards” in Scripture often contrasts with walking by the Spirit (Galatians 5:16) and seeking the Lord’s will (James 4:15). • Paul’s travel schedule was held loosely in submission to Christ, much like the early missionaries who were “kept by the Holy Spirit from preaching the word in Asia” (Acts 16:6-7). • In every adjustment Paul shows that pleasing God, not people, governs him (Galatians 1:10; Colossians 3:23). So as to say “Yes, yes” and also “No, no”? The charge is that Paul’s word cannot be trusted. He counters that accusation. • Jesus taught, “Let your ‘Yes’ be ‘Yes,’ and your ‘No,’ ‘No’” (Matthew 5:37), echoed by James 5:12. Paul affirms he lives by that very principle. • He immediately grounds his reliability in God’s own faithfulness: “As surely as God is faithful, our message to you is not ‘Yes’ and ‘No’” (2 Corinthians 1:18-20). • Because every promise of God is “Yes” in Christ, Paul insists that vacillation has no place in a gospel minister. • His change in travel plans therefore reflects transparent obedience, not double-talk. summary Paul’s rhetorical questions defend both his integrity and the gospel’s credibility. His plans were prayerful, never reckless; Spirit-led, never fleshly; and utterly sincere, never duplicitous. By pointing the Corinthians back to God’s unwavering “Yes” in Christ, he reminds every believer that faithful words and faithful living walk hand in hand. |
    |