What does 2 Kings 23:31 mean?
What is the meaning of 2 Kings 23:31?

Jehoahaz was twenty-three years old when he became king

• “Jehoahaz was twenty-three years old when he became king” (2 Kings 23:31). At roughly the same age David first served in Saul’s court, Jehoahaz steps onto the throne his father Josiah vacated (2 Kings 23:30).

• Youth is no obstacle to leadership in Scripture, yet it can expose immaturity. Other young rulers—Josiah at eight (2 Kings 22:1), Joash at seven (2 Chron 24:1)—thrived when they sought the LORD early. Jehoahaz’s record shows no such pursuit.

• The people of the land chose him (2 Kings 23:30), thinking he would continue Josiah’s reforms. His age implies vigor and promise, but character, not youth, is God’s measure (1 Samuel 16:7; 1 Timothy 4:12).


and he reigned in Jerusalem three months

• “and he reigned in Jerusalem three months” (v. 31). The brevity is startling—only one season. Pharaoh Necho II, returning from Carchemish, deposed him and imposed tribute (2 Kings 23:33-34; 2 Chron 36:3).

• Three months highlight how quickly national hopes can be dashed when a leader lacks God’s favor. Israel once endured a seven-day reign under Zimri (1 Kings 16:15), illustrating the same principle.

• Prophetic warning had foretold that disobedient kings would be “carried off… to serve other gods” (Deuteronomy 28:36); Jeremiah later applied this to Jehoahaz by name (Jeremiah 22:10-12), confirming God’s sovereignty over even the shortest reigns.


His mother’s name was Hamutal daughter of Jeremiah

• Scripture notes royal mothers to trace covenant lineage and influence. Hamutal’s presence echoes earlier listings like Bathsheba for Solomon (1 Kings 1:11) or Zebidah for Jehoiakim (2 Kings 23:36).

• This Jeremiah is a different man from the prophet; he is identified only through his hometown link in the next clause.

• Mothers often shaped their sons’ spiritual direction—positive (Abijah’s mother, 2 Chron 13:2) or negative (Athaliah, 2 Kings 11:1-3). The silence about Hamutal’s faith suggests no corrective influence against national drift.


she was from Libnah

• Libnah, a Levitical town in the lowlands of Judah (Joshua 21:13), once revolted against Joram because he “forsook the LORD” (2 Kings 8:22). The city’s mention roots Hamutal—and thus Jehoahaz—in Judah’s covenant heartland.

• A Levitical backdrop could have encouraged reverence for the Law (Numbers 3:6-9). Instead, Jehoahaz “did evil in the sight of the LORD” (2 Kings 23:32), proving heritage alone cannot secure faithfulness (John 8:39).

• Libnah’s earlier stand against apostasy contrasts with Jehoahaz’s failure, underscoring personal responsibility regardless of background (Ezekiel 18:20).


summary

The verse paints a concise yet sobering portrait: a young king with promising lineage, enthroned by popular support, lasts barely three months because he ignores the God who determines kings’ times and seasons (Daniel 2:21). His age, pedigree, and Levitical connections could not compensate for a heart missing the devotion that marked his father Josiah. The account urges every reader—whatever our upbringing or opportunity—to anchor life and leadership in wholehearted obedience to the LORD who alone secures lasting rule and blessing.

What does Jehoahaz's selection as king reveal about the people's priorities in 2 Kings 23:30?
Top of Page
Top of Page