What is the meaning of Exodus 4:25? But Zipporah took a flint knife • The scene follows the stark warning in Exodus 4:24, where “the LORD met Moses and sought to put him to death”. Zipporah’s swift action shows she grasps the seriousness of God’s covenant expectations. • Using a flint knife echoes the original circumcision command in Genesis 17:10-14 and the later national rite in Joshua 5:2-3, reminding us that even tools matter when God specifies them. • Moses, the upcoming deliverer, had neglected a basic covenant sign for his own family. James 4:17 notes the sin of knowing the right thing and failing to do it; Moses is experiencing that principle. cut off her son’s foreskin • Circumcision was the physical seal of God’s promise to Abraham (Genesis 17:11). An uncircumcised male was to be “cut off from his people” (Genesis 17:14), so God’s threat to Moses is completely consistent with His word. • By performing the rite herself, Zipporah shows that obedience sometimes requires stepping into an uncomfortable role (cf. 1 Samuel 25:18-19 where Abigail acts decisively to prevent judgment). • The cutting of flesh points to the costliness of covenant: blood must be shed (Hebrews 9:22 echoes this truth throughout Scripture). and touched it to Moses’ feet • The touch applies covenant blood to the one under threat, paralleling the Passover lamb’s blood applied to doorframes in Exodus 12:7 to avert judgment. • “Feet” often symbolize the whole person (Ruth 3:4; Isaiah 6:6-7 where a coal touches the prophet’s lips); thus Zipporah symbolically covers Moses with atoning blood. • This act satisfies God’s righteous requirement, and verse 26 reports, “So the LORD let him alone.” The sequence foreshadows Christ’s blood, which later covers believers completely (1 Peter 1:18-19). “Surely you are a bridegroom of blood to me,” she said • “Bridegroom” recalls the marriage covenant; Zipporah realizes that her union with Moses now hinges on blood covenant faithfulness. • Her words mix relief and reproach: relief that Moses’ life is spared, and reproach that the cost was so high (similar tension in Genesis 42:21 where Joseph’s brothers feel guilt yet recognize deliverance). • Exodus 4:26 states she repeated the phrase, emphasizing how the episode etched covenant realities into their family memory, much like Israel would annually remember Passover. summary Exodus 4:25 displays the life-or-death seriousness of covenant obedience. Moses, destined to lead Israel, first had to align his household with God’s command. Zipporah’s quick, costly action applied covenant blood, shielding Moses from divine judgment and underscoring that deliverance always involves shed blood. The episode prepares readers for the broader Exodus story—where obedience, blood, and deliverance intertwine—culminating finally in the perfect Bridegroom whose blood secures an everlasting covenant. |
    |