What is the meaning of Luke 22:60? Man • Peter’s terse address to the accuser (“Man,”) shows emotional distance; he refuses even the courtesy of a name or polite title, signaling a hardening heart (cf. Luke 22:56 where he had answered a “servant girl” with less intensity). • Luke alone records this blunt vocative, underscoring how each denial grows sharper (compare Mark 14:70 and Matthew 26:73 for mounting pressure). • By dismissing a fellow image-bearer, Peter simultaneously distances himself from the Lord he fears being linked to. I do not know • With these four words Peter flatly contradicts his years of close fellowship with Jesus (cf. Luke 5:8–11). • Knowledge in Scripture involves relationship (John 17:3). Peter’s denial is therefore a rejection of intimate communion, just as Jesus had warned in Luke 12:9, “whoever denies Me before men will be denied.” • The claim is factually false and spiritually disastrous, illustrating how fear can make a believer momentarily forget hard-won truth (1 Corinthians 10:12). what you are talking about • Peter disowns not merely the Man, but even the subject matter: “I have zero idea what you mean.” • This sweeping denial recalls the folly of Proverbs 26:24–26—hiding hatred with lying lips. • His words fulfill Jesus’ precise prediction (Luke 22:34); the moment highlights Scripture’s absolute reliability. Peter replied • Luke names Peter here to stress personal responsibility; no crowd or circumstance excuses sin (James 1:14–15). • The apostle’s voice—once bold (“Lord, I am ready to go with You even to prison and to death,” v.33)—now trembles with self-preservation. • Contrast his later Spirit-filled courage in Acts 4:8–12; grace will restore what fear destroyed. And immediately • The adverb links denial and consequence with no time gap, spotlighting divine orchestration (cf. Genesis 3:7 where eyes opened “at once”). • Jesus’ foreknowledge operates to the second; His sovereignty governs even a rooster’s timetable (Matthew 10:29). while he was still speaking • Judgment intersects the very syllables of sin; God answers in real time (Psalm 139:4, “Even before a word is on my tongue, You know all about it”). • The overlap intensifies conviction—Peter cannot finish his lie before evidence of prophecy rings out. the rooster crowed • The natural world testifies against human unfaithfulness; an ordinary bird becomes heaven’s alarm clock. • Mark 14:72 notes a second crowing, but Luke highlights this decisive one tied to the final denial. • The crow will lead to the Savior’s gaze (v.61) and Peter’s tears (v.62), proving that chastening is mercy aimed at repentance (Hebrews 12:6). summary Luke 22:60 captures the climax of Peter’s triple denial: a brusque address, a direct lie, and instant prophetic fulfillment sealed by a rooster’s cry. Every phrase exposes escalating fear and the flawless accuracy of Jesus’ word. Yet the same precision that unmasks failure also guarantees restoration, as the risen Lord will later reaffirm Peter’s love and commission him to service (John 21:15-17). God’s truth stands unfazed by human weakness, and His grace is ready to meet every repentant heart. |
    |