Why does Leviticus 7:22 prohibit eating fat and blood? Text and Immediate Context “Then the LORD said to Moses, ‘Speak to the Israelites: You must not eat any fat of an ox, a sheep, or a goat’ … ‘You must not eat any blood in any place where you live, whether of bird or animal’ ” (Leviticus 7:22–26). The prohibition stands within the peace-offering legislation, where the fat (ḥēleb) is to be burned on the altar (Leviticus 3:14-16) and the blood poured out at its base (Leviticus 4:7). Divine Ownership of Life and Strength 1. Blood Equals Life “For the life of the flesh is in the blood, and I have given it to you on the altar to make atonement for your souls” (Leviticus 17:11). Life belongs to Yahweh (Deuteronomy 32:39); consuming it would treat divine prerogative as common food. 2. Fat Equals Best Portion “All fat belongs to the LORD” (Leviticus 3:16). In the Ancient Near East, the choicest part of a feast honored deity; Israel’s altar displayed that God, not man, owned the creature’s strength. Typological Foreshadowing of Christ Blood poured out anticipates the shedding of the sinless Lamb’s blood (Isaiah 53:7; John 1:29; Hebrews 9:14). Fat consumed by fire points to Christ’s whole-hearted devotion consumed by divine judgment on the cross (Ephesians 5:2). Thus the ban guarded a symbol essential to the gospel’s future disclosure. Holiness and Covenant Identity Israel was to be “a kingdom of priests” (Exodus 19:6). Abstaining from fat and blood distinguished them from Canaanite cults that drank blood in fertility rites (documented in Ugaritic texts KTU 1.114). Archaeological layers at Tel Miqne and Lachish contain blood-filled bowls linked to pagan libations; Moses’ law formed a counter-culture witness. Sanitary Wisdom Without Being the Primary Motive Modern epidemiology confirms higher pathogen load in raw blood and raised LDL-cholesterol risk from visceral animal fat (cf. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 2021). While holiness, not hygiene, drives the command, God’s statutes often carry creational prudence. Early Jewish Reception Second-Temple documents (Jubilees 21:6-7) and Qumran Community Rule (1QS 6.12-13) reiterate the ban. The Ketef Hinnom silver scrolls (7th c. BC) show Torah lines already revered, underscoring textual stability. New Testament Treatment Acts 15:20 instructs Gentile believers “to abstain from blood,” echoing Noahic and Levitical principles. Paul allows meat of any kind if no idolatry is involved (1 Corinthians 10:25-26) yet never sanctions drinking blood. The ceremonial shadow is fulfilled in Christ, but the ethical recognition of life’s sanctity abides (cf. Romans 14:20-21). Christological Fulfillment, Not Abrogation Jesus declares all foods clean regarding kosher distinctions (Mark 7:19), yet He ratifies the moral heart of the law by pouring out His own blood “for many for the forgiveness of sins” (Matthew 26:28). Believers now “drink” His blood symbolically in Communion (John 6:53-56), acknowledging the very thing forbidden under shadows is embraced under substance—life received, not chewed. Practical and Pastoral Implications Today • Reverence for life: abortion, euthanasia, and violence are affronts to the God who owns blood. • Stewardship of the body: gluttony in fats remains inconsistent with honoring God in our bodies (1 Corinthians 6:19-20). • Worship priority: give God the “fat” of time, resources, and talents; He deserves the best. Consistency of Scripture and Manuscript Integrity LXX, DSS (4QLevd), Samaritan Pentateuch, and Masoretic Text all preserve the same ban, demonstrating textual harmony. Comparative religion shows only Israel grounds the ban in atonement, confirming revelatory uniqueness. |
    |