Why can't Peter follow Jesus now?
Why does Jesus tell Peter he cannot follow Him now in John 13:36?

Canonical Context

John 13 opens the Farewell Discourse (John 13–17), a carefully structured unit set on the night before the crucifixion. Jesus has just washed the disciples’ feet, predicted His betrayal, identified Judas, and announced His imminent departure. This conversation anchors the transition from Christ’s public ministry to His redemptive passion.


Immediate Literary Context

Verses 31-35 frame Christ’s glorification through the cross and introduce the “new commandment” of love. The “now” (Greek: arti) of verse 36 is tethered to that climactic glorification. Jesus’ path includes Gethsemane, arrest, trials, crucifixion, resurrection, and ascension—events Peter cannot yet share because they are uniquely messianic and substitutionary.


Peter’s Zeal and Human Limitation

Peter’s question reveals sincere devotion but also self-reliance. Only Jesus can bear sin (Isaiah 53:6), drink the cup (Matthew 26:39), and endure divine wrath (2 Corinthians 5:21). Peter’s overconfidence surfaces again when he vows loyalty (John 13:37) yet denies Jesus three times (18:17-27). The restriction “you cannot follow now” exposes humanity’s inability to accomplish redemption and foregrounds grace.


Divine Redemptive Timetable

Scripture portrays salvation history as divinely sequenced (Galatians 4:4; Acts 2:23). Christ must die and rise before discipleship can mature into Spirit-empowered witness (John 7:39). Peter’s later following will occur: (1) physically, by martyrdom (John 21:18-19); (2) spiritually, through union with Christ by the Spirit (John 14:17-19); and (3) eschatologically, in glory (John 14:3).


Necessity of Christ’s Unique Atonement

The Passover context (John 13:1) evokes Exodus typology: only the spotless Lamb’s blood averts judgment (Exodus 12:13). Hebrews reinforces that no mere mortal can enter the heavenly sanctuary with his own blood (Hebrews 9:11-12). Peter’s substitution is impossible; Jesus alone satisfies justice.


Impending Apostolic Commission

Peter’s present assignment is to survive, be restored (Luke 22:32), receive the Spirit (Acts 2), and shepherd the flock (John 21:15-17; 1 Peter 5:1-4). His future leadership depends on Christ’s prior accomplishment and the Pentecostal endowment.


Eschatological Assurance

The promise “you will follow later” foreshadows the believer’s resurrection (1 Peter 1:3-4) and the New Creation (Revelation 21:1-4). Early creeds, echoing 1 Corinthians 15:3-7, affirm that the historical, bodily resurrection—verified by multiple eyewitnesses, including Peter—guarantees this hope.


Intertextual Witness

1. John 14:2-3—Jesus prepares a place.

2. John 16:7—His departure secures the Paraclete’s arrival.

3. 1 Peter 2:21—Peter later interprets suffering as following Christ’s pattern.


Historical and Archaeological Corroboration

1. The first-century “Pilate Stone” (Caesarea) confirms the prefect who condemned Jesus.

2. Ossuaries bearing names “Joseph,” “James,” and “Simon” reflect the familial nomenclature common to the Gospels, bolstering authenticity.

3. The discovery of a crucified ankle bone at Giv’at ha-Mivtar verifies Roman crucifixion methods analogous to the Gospel narratives.


Practical and Pastoral Implications

Believers may crave immediate triumph, yet Christ often withholds certain experiences for their maturation. Peter’s journey counsels patience, humility, and dependence on grace. Denial gave way to restoration; failure forged a shepherd’s heart.


Philosophical Considerations

Only a transcendent God can ground objective moral values (Romans 3:26) and orchestrate a coherent telos wherein suffering serves redemption (Romans 8:28). Christ’s “now”/“later” dichotomy exemplifies purposeful delay, not arbitrary restriction.


Applications for Modern Believers

1. Accept the limits God places on present knowledge and experience.

2. Trust God’s timetable, assured by Christ’s historical resurrection.

3. Embrace restoration after failure, confident in future glorification.

Peter could not follow then because only the sinless Son could tread the path of atonement, yet the promise of “later” secures the destiny of every disciple—from first-century fishermen to twenty-first-century readers—who place their faith in the risen Lord.

How does John 13:36 relate to the concept of predestination?
Top of Page
Top of Page