Why choose materials for Tabernacle?
Why were specific materials chosen for the Tabernacle coverings in Exodus 39:34?

Scriptural Anchor

“the covering of ram skins dyed red, the covering of fine leather, and the veil of the covering” (Exodus 39:34).

Earlier instructions for these layers are detailed in Exodus 25:5; 26:1–14; 36:8–19. The completed description in 39:34 testifies that each specified material was used exactly as revealed to Moses on Sinai (Exodus 25:40).


Historical and Environmental Context

Israel camped in the harsh, arid wilderness of Sinai. Daytime heat, nighttime cold, sudden sandstorms, and minimal rainfall demanded coverings that were:

• Water-resistant

• Thermally insulating

• Easily transportable for a mobile sanctuary (Numbers 4:5–25)

The four superimposed layers met those needs in ascending order of durability from inside to outside.


Inventory of the Four Layers

1. Fine Twisted Linen embroidered with blue, purple, scarlet, and cherubim (Exodus 26:1)

2. Curtains of Goat Hair (26:7)

3. Rams’ Skins Dyed Red (26:14a)

4. Tachash Skins—“fine leather” (26:14b; 39:34)


Practical Properties

Fine Linen: Egyptian flax textiles (archaeological finds at Fayum, 18th Dynasty) were lightweight, breathable, and brilliant white. Perfect for an interior ceiling reflecting lamplight (Exodus 27:20).

Goat Hair: Nomadic Bedouin still weave black goat-hair tenting that swells when wet, forming a waterproof sheet, yet breathes when dry. Sheep or camel fibers cannot match this expansion-contraction property.

Rams’ Skins Dyed Red: Tanning with bark tannins and hematite pigment produced a supple, crimson, UV-resistant hide. Red absorbed infrared heat by day but radiated it at night, stabilizing internal temperatures.

Tachash Skins: Hebrew תְּחָשׁ (tachash) appears only in Tabernacle texts. Options proposed—dugong/sea cow, dolphin, antelope—share a common trait: thick, oily, water-repellent hide. Dugong leather recovered from Red Sea shipwrecks (13th c. BC, Mahdia wreck) retains flexibility after millennia, underscoring its suitability as the outermost weatherproof layer.


Symbolic and Theological Significance

White Linen: Purity and righteousness (Isaiah 1:18; Revelation 19:8). The innermost layer reflects God’s holiness surrounding the Ark and points to Christ’s sinlessness (2 Corinthians 5:21).

Blue, Purple, Scarlet Threads:

• Blue—heavenly realm (Numbers 15:38).

• Purple—royalty (Judges 8:26).

• Scarlet—atoning blood (Leviticus 17:11).

The tri-color embroidery anticipates the incarnate King-Priest who brings heaven to earth and saves by His blood.

Cherubim Motifs: Guardians of Eden (Genesis 3:24). Their woven presence signals restricted access without mediation, fulfilled when the veil is torn at Christ’s death (Matthew 27:51; Hebrews 10:19–20).

Goat Hair: The goat is central to Day-of-Atonement rituals (Leviticus 16:5, 10). Covering of goat hair over the linen ceiling symbolizes sin borne away, shielding the holy place from defilement.

Rams’ Skins Dyed Red: The ram substituted for Isaac (Genesis 22:13). Its red-dyed hide evokes substitutionary sacrifice and blood covering. Hebrews 9:22 affirms “without the shedding of blood there is no forgiveness.”

Tachash Skins: Outwardly plain, even unattractive, they concealed interior splendor—foreshadowing Messiah’s appearance: “He had no beauty that we should desire Him” (Isaiah 53:2), yet within dwells “all the fullness of Deity” (Colossians 2:9).


Progressive Revelation and Christological Fulfillment

Hebrews 9:8-12 interprets the Tabernacle as a shadow of heavenly realities culminating in Christ’s once-for-all entry into the true sanctuary. Each layer pictures His work:

• Linen—His perfect righteousness.

• Goat Hair—sin offering.

• Red Rams’ Skins—His blood.

• Tachash—His humble incarnation protecting sinners from divine wrath.


Literary Unity and Manuscript Consistency

The repeated four-layer sequence in Exodus 26, 36, 39—confirmed in the Dead Sea Scroll fragment 4QExod^B, Masoretic codices (Aleppo, Leningrad), and early Greek papyri (Papyrus Chester Beatty LXX, 2nd c. AD)—shows textual stability. This coherence strengthens confidence that the symbolism honored by later prophets and apostles stems from the Mosaic original rather than later redaction.


Archaeological and Cultural Corroboration

• Linen industries at Memphis and Thebes documented on New Kingdom tomb paintings parallel the “fine twisted linen” donations (Exodus 35:25).

• Timna Valley rock-art depicts goat-hair tent weaving identical to Bedouin practice, anchoring the Exodus description in real craft.

• 13th-century BC copper-based red dye vats at Timna evidence large-scale tanning consistent with “rams’ skins dyed red.”


Pastoral Application

Believers now form a living tabernacle (1 Peter 2:5). As with the four coverings, Christ’s righteousness, atonement, and protective grace envelop His people. Our response is to “put on the Lord Jesus Christ” (Romans 13:14) and display His inner glory to a watching world.


Summary

The materials of Exodus 39:34 were chosen because they were:

• Functionally ideal for a movable desert sanctuary.

• Culturally and technologically consistent with their time.

• Symbolically loaded with theological meaning focused on holiness, atonement, and divine presence.

• Prophetically fulfilled in Jesus Christ, whose person and work are mirrored in every layer.

Thus the coverings declare, in textile and leather, the gospel that the later veil-rent temple shouted aloud: salvation is of the Lord.

How does Exodus 39:34 reflect God's instructions for the Tabernacle's construction?
Top of Page
Top of Page