Why does Psalm 139:22 express hatred when Jesus taught to love enemies? Literary Genre: Imprecatory Language Psalm 139:19-22 belongs to the imprecatory tradition (cf. Psalm 69; 109). Imprecations are judicial appeals that God would act as the rightful King to restrain and judge evil. They mirror courtroom petitions: evil is identified, evidence is presented (“Your adversaries misuse Your name,” v. 20), and a verdict is sought. As Israel’s anointed king, David bears state responsibility (Deuteronomy 17:18-20), so his “hatred” is forensic hostility toward persistent covenant-breakers who threaten the community, not a personal vendetta. The Semantic Range Of שָׂנֵא (Saneʾ, “Hate”) Hebrew שָׂנֵא can denote emotional repulsion (Genesis 37:4), but often it is a covenantal-loyalty term meaning “reject,” “oppose,” or “disavow” (Malachi 1:3; Luke 14:26 when rendered from Hebrew idiom into Greek). David’s expression “perfect hatred” (תִּכְלִית שִׂנְאָה) bears the sense of complete, undivided opposition—total solidarity with God’s stance against entrenched evil. Theological Framework: Love For God Necessarily Entails Hatred Of Evil Scripture repeatedly couples love for Yahweh with hatred for evil. • “Hate evil, you who love the LORD” (Psalm 97:10). • “The fear of the LORD is to hate evil” (Proverbs 8:13). • Jesus likewise lauds the Ephesian church: “You hate the works of the Nicolaitans, which I also hate” (Revelation 2:6). Thus, hatred of wickedness is a moral reflex of loving the Holy One. The psalmist’s posture is not personal spite but moral alignment with God’s character. Jesus’ Command: “Love Your Enemies” (Matthew 5:44) Jesus’ imperative addresses interpersonal conduct within the Kingdom ethic. He forbids retaliatory malice and prescribes benevolent action toward personal enemies, reflected in His prayer on the cross (Luke 23:34). Nowhere does He condone tolerance of evil as such; He denounces unrepentant cities (Matthew 11:20-24) and confronts religious hypocrisy (Matthew 23). Jesus embodies both compassion and righteous indignation (Mark 3:5). Harmonization: Complementary, Not Contradictory 1. Sphere of Concern • Psalm 139: judicial hatred of persistent, God-defying wickedness. • Matthew 5:44: personal disposition toward one’s persecutors. 2. Object • David targets those who “rise up against You” (v. 21). • Jesus targets personal adversaries who harm the disciple. 3. Motive • David: covenant loyalty; he seeks God’s honor. • Jesus: redemptive witness; He seeks their salvation (Matthew 5:45). 4. Posture Toward Judgment • Both leave vengeance with God (cf. Romans 12:19). Righteous Indignation Vs. Personal Malice Paul captures the balance: “Let love be without hypocrisy. Abhor what is evil; cling to what is good” (Romans 12:9). Believers must simultaneously detest evil systems (human trafficking, idolatry, oppression) while loving and praying for the individuals ensnared by them, longing for their repentance (2 Peter 3:9). Progressive Revelation, Same Moral Core Scripture’s unfolding story shows greater clarity in applying God’s holiness and mercy, yet the moral core remains constant. David’s longing for justice anticipates the eschatological judgment Jesus will execute (John 5:22-29). The Sermon on the Mount intensifies the Old Testament ethic by internalizing it (Matthew 5:21-48). Hatred of evil remains; benevolence toward persons is sharpened. Love And Hatred In Hebrew Thought: A Covenantal Dichotomy In covenant literature, “love” often signifies loyal acceptance and “hate” signifies decisive rejection (cf. Genesis 29:31; Malachi 1:2-3). David’s language reflects this idiom. One cannot be neutrally tolerant toward God’s blasphemers without betraying covenant fidelity (James 4:4). Practical Implications For Believers Today 1. Cultivate holy revulsion toward sin—beginning with one’s own (Psalm 139:23-24). 2. Pray for and do tangible good to personal adversaries, mirroring Christ. 3. Advocate for justice in society, resisting evil structures without harboring bitterness. 4. Entrust ultimate judgment to God; He alone sorts wheat from tares (Matthew 13:30). Conclusion Psalm 139:22 voices covenantal, judicial hatred of entrenched evil, consistent with the biblical mandate to hate sin. Jesus’ command to love enemies governs personal conduct and strives for their redemption. The two teachings cohere: believers hate what is evil because they love God, yet love evildoers sacrificially, praying they become former enemies reconciled through Christ’s cross (Colossians 1:20-22). |
    |