Why does Psalm 136:10 emphasize God's love in the context of Egypt's firstborn being struck down? Text of Psalm 136:10 “He struck down the firstborn of Egypt— for His loving devotion endures forever.” Placement within Psalm 136 Psalm 136 is a responsive hymn in which every historical act named in verses 4-25 is followed by the identical refrain, “for His loving devotion endures forever.” The structure insists that each event—creation, covenant, conquest, provision, and judgment alike—must be interpreted through the lens of God’s ḥesed, His steadfast covenant love. Definition and Scope of Ḥesed The Hebrew ḥesed embraces loyalty, mercy, covenant faithfulness, and active benevolence. It is not sentimental affection but a determined commitment to keep covenant promises even when that requires protective justice (Exodus 34:6-7). Thus ḥesed can motivate rescue (Psalm 136:11) and retribution (verse 10) simultaneously. Historical Background: The Tenth Plague • Exodus 1 records Egypt’s attempted genocide of Hebrew infants; God’s response climaxes in the death of Egypt’s firstborn (Exodus 11–12). • Pharaoh received nine escalating warnings (Exodus 7–10), demonstrating divine patience (Romans 2:4). • The firstborn represented the nation’s future and were formally dedicated to Egypt’s gods (e.g., Horus). Yahweh’s judgment therefore exposed both moral oppression and idolatry (Exodus 12:12). Love Expressed Through Judgment 1. Protection of the Oppressed: Delivering Israel from centuries-long slavery (Exodus 1:13-14) was an act of love; dismantling the oppressor’s power was inseparable from that love (Isaiah 43:3-4). 2. Moral Order: Divine justice vindicates victims and restrains evil (Psalm 9:7-10). Scripture presents judgment as an expression of holy love, not its negation (Nahum 1:2-3). 3. Covenant Faithfulness: God had sworn to Abraham to judge the nation that enslaved his descendants (Genesis 15:13-14). Keeping that oath is ḥesed. Passover: Substitutionary Mercy Foreshadowing Christ • A spotless lamb’s blood spared every household that believed (Exodus 12:3-13; Hebrews 11:28). • This anticipates Jesus, “our Passover lamb” (1 Corinthians 5:7; John 1:29), whose death satisfies justice while extending love universally (Romans 3:25-26). • Psalm 136 therefore recalls the first Passover to celebrate the greater, ultimate deliverance secured by the resurrected Christ (1 Peter 1:18-21). Opportunities for Repentance Rejected Pharaoh’s heart was repeatedly hardened by his own choice (Exodus 8:15, 32) and judicially by God after persistent rebellion (Exodus 9:12). The prolonged series of plagues demonstrates that judgment came only after mercy was despised (Proverbs 29:1). Corporate Responsibility and the Firstborn Ancient Near-Eastern society was corporate: the firstborn embodied family identity and destiny. Scripture often treats the representative head as bearing national consequences (Joshua 7:24-25; Romans 5:12-19). Striking Egypt’s firstborn judged the nation through its representatives while sparing all—Egyptian or Hebrew—who trusted Yahweh’s provision (Exodus 12:38; Numbers 11:4). Divine Right over the Firstborn According to Exodus 4:22-23, Israel is God’s “firstborn son.” Pharaoh’s refusal to release God’s firstborn justified the reciprocal claim on Egypt’s firstborn. The plague is thus portrayed as measured retribution, not arbitrary violence. Archaeological and Documentary Corroboration • Merneptah Stele (c. 1208 BC) confirms Israel’s presence in Canaan soon after an exodus-compatible timeframe. • The Ipuwer Papyrus (Pap. Leiden 344) describes Nile bloodshed, darkness, and widespread death of children; its parallels to Exodus plagues are noted even by secular Egyptologists. • Semitic slave settlements in Goshen (Tell el-Dab‘a/Avaris excavations) align with the biblical setting. • Passover regulations in the oldest extant Hebrew text (Leningrad Codex, 1008 AD) match those in Dead Sea Scroll 4QExod, illustrating textual stability. Philosophical and Moral Considerations 1. God as the Ultimate Good: An omnibenevolent Creator cannot ignore cruelty without ceasing to be good (Habakkuk 1:13). 2. Finite Perspective: Human moral intuition is limited; divine omniscience guarantees perfectly just allocation of temporal and eternal destinies (Genesis 18:25). 3. Redemptive Teleology: Temporary earthly judgment can serve eternal salvation purposes, as evidenced by Egyptians who joined Israel (Exodus 12:38) and later feared the LORD (Isaiah 19:19-25). Christological Fulfillment Intensifying the Theme of Love God later offers His own “only begotten Son” (John 3:16) in place of sinners; the death that fell on Egypt’s firstborn prefigures the voluntary sacrifice of God’s Firstborn (Colossians 1:18). The juxtaposition in Psalm 136 intends readers to contrast deserved judgment on Egypt with the grace they themselves now receive through Christ (Romans 5:8-9). Practical Application • When confronting evil, believers trust that God’s love and justice are never at odds. • The refrain “His loving devotion endures forever” invites worshippers to rehearse both pleasant and severe providences as facets of covenant love. • For skeptics, the passage challenges the assumption that love equals non-judgment; biblical love wills the highest good, which sometimes requires decisive intervention. Conclusion Psalm 136:10 emphasizes God’s enduring love precisely because the striking down of Egypt’s firstborn was not capricious violence but an integral act of covenant faithfulness, deliverance, and redemptive foreshadowing. The event demonstrates love that rescues the oppressed, confronts entrenched evil, honors promise, anticipates the Passover Lamb, and ultimately points to the cross and resurrection of Christ—assuring that His ḥesed truly “endures forever.” |
    |