What is the significance of the kiss in Luke 7:45 in biblical times? Hospitality Customs in the Second-Temple Era In Judea and the broader Greco-Roman world, three gestures marked respectful reception of an honored guest: 1. Foot washing (Genesis 18:4; John 13:5) 2. A greeting kiss (2 Samuel 20:9; Proverbs 24:26) 3. Anointing with oil or fragrant ointment (Psalm 23:5; Amos 6:6) Archaeological ostraca from Qumran (4Q502) reference “the kiss of the assembly” as part of communal meals. Rabbinic commentary (b. Ketubot 17a) lists “kissing of hands” among obligatory courtesies to esteemed rabbis. Simon’s omission of the customary kiss thus constituted a silent slight; the woman’s lavish response reversed that insult. Forms and Functions of the Kiss in Scripture 1. Family affection: Jacob and Esau (Genesis 33:4) 2. Covenant loyalty: Samuel and Saul (1 Samuel 10:1) 3. Reconciliation: Joseph and brothers (Genesis 45:15) 4. Betrayal: Judas (Luke 22:48) 5. Worshipful submission: “Kiss the Son” (Psalm 2:12) The act could symbolize allegiance (1 Kings 19:18), equality among believers (“holy kiss,” Romans 16:16; 1 Thessalonians 5:26), or prostration before deity, as indicated by Akkadian kudurru inscriptions that depict vassals “kissing the feet” of sovereigns. Narrative Contrast in Luke 7:36-50 Luke juxtaposes Simon’s formalism with the woman’s unrestrained devotion. Three antitheses dominate: • No water vs. tears (v. 44) • No greeting kiss vs. constant foot-kissing (v. 45) • No oil vs. costly myrrh (v. 46) Her action becomes the concrete evidence of “faith working through love” (cf. Galatians 5:6). Jesus interprets the kiss not merely as sentiment but as forensic testimony of forgiveness (v. 47). Anthropological Insight Behavioral studies of proxemics show that physical touch communicates intensity of commitment. In hierarchal cultures, lowering oneself to kiss feet signals maximum status reversal—one relinquishes honor to exalt another. The woman’s posture (behind Jesus, v. 38) aligns with ancient Near-Eastern iconography where petitioners embrace or kiss a ruler’s feet for clemency, reinforcing the Lukan theme of the humble exalted (Luke 14:11). Theological Significance 1. Christological Recognition: By bestowing a kiss reserved for sovereigns, the woman tacitly identifies Jesus as Messianic Lord (cf. Psalm 2:12). 2. Soteriological Paradigm: Her kiss embodies repentance and faith—prerequisites for salvation affirmed by Jesus’ concluding declaration, “Your faith has saved you” (v. 50). 3. Eschatological Foretaste: The scene prefigures universal homage at Christ’s return, “that at the name of Jesus every knee should bow” (Philippians 2:10). Parallels in Lukan Corpus Luke 15:20—The father’s kiss on the prodigal parallels divine initiative in forgiveness. Acts 20:37—The Ephesian elders “fell on Paul’s neck and kissed him,” demonstrating covenantal affection within the redeemed community. Patristic Witness Tertullian (de Orat. 18) identifies the Christian kiss as “a seal of prayer,” linking it to Luke 7 as archetype of penitential devotion. Chrysostom (Hom. in Matthew 80) contrasts Judas’ treacherous kiss with the sinful woman’s salvific kiss, asserting that motive, not motion, defines moral value. Archaeological Corroboration A third-century fresco in the Catacomb of Priscilla depicts a woman bending to Christ’s feet, corroborating early Christian memory of the episode. First-century ossuaries from Jerusalem bear inscriptions invoking mercy (chesed), a cultural ethos mirrored in the woman’s pleadings through her kiss. Application for Contemporary Discipleship The episode challenges modern believers to examine the authenticity of their worship. External orthodoxy without heartfelt affection (Simon) falls short; lavish, self-abasing love (the woman) exemplifies true discipleship. Corporate gatherings retain the apostolic admonition to greet “with a holy kiss,” contextualized today as sincere, culturally appropriate expressions of unity and honor toward the risen Lord. Summary The kiss in Luke 7:45 is a multilayered symbol: culturally a routine act of hospitality, socially a demonstration of humility, relationally an overture of reconciliation, and theologically an acknowledgment of Jesus’ divine authority and the transformative power of grace. Its enduring relevance lies in portraying the proper human response to incarnate mercy—unreserved love that glorifies God and affirms the exclusivity of salvation through Christ alone. |
    |