Is Herod's temple considered the third temple? Historical Overview of the Temple in Jerusalem The question of whether Herod’s Temple is considered the “third temple” arises from how certain traditions categorize the expansions, reconstructions, and prophesied future temples mentioned in Scripture and Jewish history. To address this, it is essential to look at the records of the First Temple (Solomon’s), the Second Temple (often called Zerubbabel’s), and Herod the Great’s large-scale renovative effort on that Second Temple. By tracing the biblical text, historical writings, and archaeological finds, we can arrive at a clearer perspective on this topic. Below is a comprehensive Bible Encyclopedia / Topical Bible entry that provides context for each temple and examines whether Herod’s Temple should be deemed the “third.” 1. Solomon’s Temple: The First Temple Solomon’s Temple was constructed under King Solomon, son of David, around the tenth century BC. Scripture recounts that David intended to build a house for the LORD, but it was Solomon who carried out the work. • Construction Account: “Then Solomon began to build the house of the LORD in Jerusalem on Mount Moriah…” (2 Chronicles 3:1). The remarkable details of the temple’s measurements and materials are recorded in 1 Kings 6 and 2 Chronicles 3. This temple stood until it was destroyed by the Babylonians under King Nebuchadnezzar in 586 BC (2 Kings 25:8–10). • Significance and Sanctity: Solomon’s Temple is often called the “First Temple” due to its primacy and divine inauguration. The glory of God (the Shekinah) filled its courts (1 Kings 8:10–11). It was central to Israel’s religious life and covenant identity. 2. Zerubbabel’s Temple: The Second Temple After the Babylonian exile, Persian King Cyrus issued a decree allowing exiled Jews to return and rebuild the temple (Ezra 1:1–4). Under the leadership of Zerubbabel, they laid the foundations for what is generally referred to as the Second Temple. • Rebuilding Effort: “Then the people of Israel… arose and rebuilt the house of God in Jerusalem. And with them were the prophets of God, helping them.” (Ezra 5:2). Although the Second Temple was far less grand than Solomon’s edifice (Haggai 2:3), the prophets encouraged the people that God’s favor remained (Haggai 2:7–9). • Completion and Worship: Zerubbabel’s Temple was completed around 516 BC (Ezra 6:15). Sacrifices and rituals according to the Law continued at this temple’s altar, and it remained the center of Jewish worship through the centuries leading up to the time of Christ. 3. Herod’s Massive Renovation Beginning roughly in 20 BC, Herod the Great undertook a monumental expansion project on Zerubbabel’s Temple. This undertaking was so thorough that, in many respects, the renovated structure was much larger and more ornate than the original Second Temple. Despite the scale of this project, most historical records—such as those from the Jewish historian Flavius Josephus—indicate that Herod’s work was not viewed as an entirely new temple, but rather a significant enhancement or complete overhaul of the Second Temple. • Historical Testimonies: Josephus (Antiquities of the Jews 15.380–425) describes Herod’s rebuilding in great detail, noting the remarkable stonework and intricate craftsmanship. The courts were expanded, walls reinforced, and the overall appearance of the temple was transformed. • Scriptural Reference: John 2:20 states, “They replied, ‘This temple took forty-six years to build, and You are going to raise it up in three days?’” This verse reflects how ongoing work on the temple complex lasted decades, underscoring the enormity of Herod’s reconstruction and expansion. • Archaeological Evidence: Archaeological discoveries, including the Temple Mount’s massive foundation stones and remnants of monumental staircases, corroborate ancient descriptions of Herod’s substantial renovation. These findings align with the biblical account and serve as tangible testimony to the reliability of Scripture in recording historical details. 4. Classification Debate: Second or Third Temple? The crux of the discussion lies in whether one views Herod’s expansion as a completely new temple or an extensive continuation of Zerubbabel’s Temple. The following points illustrate the main perspectives: • Continuation of the Second Temple: 1) Most Jewish and Christian traditions hold that Herod’s project was still the Second Temple, albeit thoroughly refurbished. 2) Sacrificial services and other temple rituals continued uninterrupted; worship did not formally cease and restart as it had after the Babylonian destruction of Solomon’s Temple. 3) By tradition, the “third temple” is often anticipated as the future temple spoken of in eschatological passages (cf. Ezekiel 40–48, though some interpret these chapters differently). • Argument for a “Third Temple”: 1) Some describe Herod’s work as creating an effectively brand-new structure because of the scale, time, and resources invested. 2) Certain historical references from the period underscore how drastically different the “Herodian Temple” looked compared to Zerubbabel’s. Herod replaced nearly every part of the structure itself, leaving little to nothing of the previous building. Nonetheless, the more common scholarly and traditional stance (including many ancient Jewish authorities) is that Herod’s Temple was not a completely new temple but a grandiose renovation of Zerubbabel’s. Therefore, it is most frequently identified as a continuation of the Second Temple, rather than a strictly separate “third.” 5. Scriptural and Theological Considerations • Prophetic Significance: Prophets like Haggai spoke of the future glory of the Second Temple (Haggai 2:9). Some interpret these references to point forward to the day Christ Himself entered Herod’s refurbished Temple, bringing the very presence of God (Malachi 3:1; Luke 2:27–32). • Eschatological Temple: Ezekiel’s visions (Ezekiel 40–48) describe a future temple, often viewed as a prefiguration of a “Third Temple.” Many theological viewpoints debate whether this is a literal temple yet to be built or symbolic of God’s restored presence among His people. The key point remains that historically, a “third temple” is generally understood as one that was never fulfilled by Herod’s expansion. • Connection to Christ: The Gospels record Jesus teaching in this enlarged temple, driving out the money-changers (John 2:14–16) and prophesying its destruction (Matthew 24:2). Indeed, in AD 70, the Romans under Titus demolished this temple, fulfilling Christ’s words. These events are also attested in Jewish and Roman writings (e.g., Josephus, War of the Jews 6.249–253). 6. Conclusion: Is Herod’s Temple Considered the Third Temple? In the common parlance of biblical history and Jewish tradition, Herod’s Temple is not typically regarded as the “third temple.” It is broadly understood as the Second Temple—originally built under Zerubbabel—renovated and magnificently expanded by Herod the Great. Despite its impressive redesign, tradition and most ancient authorities continue to view it as a continuation rather than a wholly separate structure. For those who distinguish a separate classification, it is a minority view that Herod’s Temple functioned as a “third temple” in practice because of how drastically it was rebuilt. However, the predominant perspective, both historically and in much of modern scholarship, retains Herod’s Temple under the umbrella of the Second Temple. 7. Broader Reliability and Historical Veracity This discussion underscores the consistency of Scripture with archaeological findings and extra-biblical historical accounts. The discoveries of massive foundation stones, the remnants of temple courts, and ancient literary testimonies all align with the biblical narrative. They further support the reliability of the biblical authors, attesting that the events spoken of truly transpired. The integrity of Scripture in these historical details provides confidence in the broader biblical claims, including the existence of an eternal Creator and the resurrection of Christ—central tenets of the Christian faith. The thorough documentation around the Jerusalem Temple, preserved through centuries of manuscripts and corroborated by archaeological evidence, illustrates how God’s revealed word remains consistent and trustworthy. Summary • Solomon’s Temple (First) was built by King Solomon and destroyed in 586 BC. • Zerubbabel’s Temple (Second) was rebuilt after the exile, sometime around 516 BC. • Herod’s Temple is broadly considered an extensive renovation and expansion of that Second Temple, not a separate temple. • Prophecies referencing a “third temple” generally point to a future eschatological temple, not Herod’s reconstructed edifice. Hence, most historical, scriptural, and traditional interpretations affirm that Herod’s Temple is indeed counted as the Second Temple, albeit magnificently transformed. |
    |