2642. katalithazó
Lexical Summary
katalithazó: To stone, to stone to death

Original Word: καταλιθάζω
Part of Speech: Verb
Transliteration: katalithazó
Pronunciation: kat-al-ith-ad'-zo
Phonetic Spelling: (kat-al-ith-ad'-zo)
KJV: stone
NASB: stone to death
Word Origin: [from G2596 (κατά - according) and G3034 (λιθάζω - stone)]

1. to stone down, i.e. to death

Strong's Exhaustive Concordance
stone.

From kata and lithazo; to stone down, i.e. To death -- stone.

see GREEK kata

see GREEK lithazo

HELPS Word-studies

2642 katalitházō (an intensified form of 3034 /litházō, "to stone") – properly, stone a person (down) to death; to mutilate or kill by stoning (note the force of the prefix, 2596 /katá, "down").

NAS Exhaustive Concordance
Word Origin
from kata and lithazó
Definition
to cast stones at
NASB Translation
stone...to death (1).

Thayer's Greek Lexicon
STRONGS NT 2642: καταλιθάζω

καταλιθάζω: future καταλιθάσω; (see κατά, III. 3 (cf. Winers Grammar, 102 (97))); to overwhelm with stones, to stone: Luke 20:6. (Ecclesiastical writings.)

Topical Lexicon
Concept and Emphasis

The verb behind Strong’s Greek 2642 portrays a communal act of hurling stones with the intention of putting someone to death. The prepositional prefix intensifies the picture, highlighting the certainty and completeness of the judgment expected by the crowd.

Biblical Background of Stoning

Stoning was the standard legal penalty in the Mosaic Law for offenses that attacked covenant holiness—blasphemy (Leviticus 24:16), idolatry (Deuteronomy 17:2-5), adultery (Deuteronomy 22:24), and Sabbath violation (Numbers 15:35-36). Because stones were plentiful and every member of the community could participate, the punishment dramatically underscored corporate responsibility for preserving purity before God (Deuteronomy 13:9-10). By the first century this practice still represented the people’s ultimate sanction against perceived sacrilege, even when Roman law officially reserved capital punishment for the prefect.

Context in Luke 20:6

Standing in the temple courts, the religious leaders debate how to answer Jesus’ question about John’s baptism. “But if we say, ‘From men,’ all the people will stone us, for they are convinced that John was a prophet.” (Luke 20:6). Here Strong’s 2642 communicates more than a theoretical danger; the leaders know the crowd is ready to mete out swift and lethal retribution if they diminish John’s divine commission. This threat demonstrates (1) the profound respect that common people still held for genuine prophetic ministry and (2) the political vulnerability of leaders who cared more for public approval than for truth.

Theology of Corporate Judgment

The single New Testament occurrence preserves the Old Testament understanding that stoning is not an impulsive mob action but a covenantal response to ungodliness. In Luke 20:6 the crowd sees denial of John’s authority as tantamount to rejecting God Himself. Thus Strong’s 2642 calls attention to the tension between divine authority and human fear throughout Scripture (Proverbs 29:25; Acts 5:29).

Historical and Cultural Insight

Jewish tradition required witnesses to cast the first stones (Deuteronomy 17:7), ensuring that accusations carried personal accountability. Rabbinic sources agree that a council could pronounce the sentence, yet the populace often executed it spontaneously when passions were inflamed, as in the threatened lynching of Jesus (John 10:31) or the attempted stoning of Stephen (Acts 7:57-58). Luke 20:6 reflects this volatility: the leaders anticipate a popular tribunal needing no formal verdict.

Relationship to Other New Testament Passages

Although Strong’s 2642 appears only once, other verbs for stoning (for example, λιθάζω) recur in John 8:59; Acts 14:19; Hebrews 11:37. Together they reveal a persistent pattern: God’s messengers face the same punishment Israel once reserved for covenant violators. Jesus forewarns, “For this reason also the wisdom of God said, ‘I will send them prophets and apostles, and some of them they will kill and persecute.’” (Luke 11:49). The threatened action in Luke 20:6 foreshadows the martyrdom that meets Stephen and, ultimately, the rejection of the Messiah Himself.

Pastoral and Missional Applications

1. Fear of man can silence testimony. Leaders in Luke 20:6 would rather evade truth than risk violent backlash. Faithful ministry today must resist that temptation (2 Timothy 1:7-8).
2. Genuine prophetic witness carries weight. The crowd’s readiness to defend John’s honor reminds the Church that Spirit-empowered proclamation still commands consciences.
3. God alone determines life and death. Even when human courts or mobs presume final authority, the resurrection of Jesus vindicates those who suffer for righteousness (1 Peter 3:14-18).

Summary

Strong’s Greek 2642 captures the gravity of communal execution by stoning, serving as a vivid warning in Luke 20:6. It ties the Gospel narrative to the covenant justice of the Old Testament and exposes the moral crossroads where leaders must choose between appeasing men and honoring God.

Forms and Transliterations
καταλιθασει καταλιθάσει καταλιθοβολήσαι καταλιθοβολήσουσί καταλίθον καταλιμπάνει καταλιμπανείν καταλιμπάνουσιν katalithasei katalithásei
Links
Interlinear GreekInterlinear HebrewStrong's NumbersEnglishman's Greek ConcordanceEnglishman's Hebrew ConcordanceParallel Texts
Englishman's Concordance
Luke 20:6 V-FIA-3S
GRK: λαὸς ἅπας καταλιθάσει ἡμᾶς πεπεισμένος
NAS: the people will stone us to death, for they are convinced
KJV: all the people will stone us: for
INT: people all will stone us persuaded

Strong's Greek 2642
1 Occurrence


καταλιθάσει — 1 Occ.

2641
Top of Page
Top of Page