What archaeological evidence supports the events described in Joshua 2:10? Joshua 2:10 “For we have heard how the LORD dried up the waters of the Red Sea before you when you came out of Egypt, and what you did to Sihon and Og, the two kings of the Amorites east of the Jordan, whom you completely destroyed.” Egyptian Witnesses to Semitic Exodus-Era Turmoil Multiple lines of data reveal sudden depopulation of Semitic slave quarters and chaos consistent with Exodus 1–14. • Avaris (Tell el-Dabʿa) – Austrian excavations under Manfred Bietak document a flourishing Semitic city abruptly abandoned near the end of Dynasty XVIII. Large slave-style burial grounds and Asiatic pottery coincide with biblical Goshen (Exodus 8:22). • Ipuwer Papyrus (Admonitions, Leiden 344) – An Egyptian copy of a Middle Kingdom lament reused in the New Kingdom; its references to Nile turning to “blood,” servants escaping, and Egypt’s desolation echo plague motifs. • Karnak Relief of Amenhotep II – Depicts chariot losses near the “Yam-suph” region and lists captives taken by the pharaoh; an omitting of triumphal boast over Israel fits a humiliating defeat (cf. Exodus 14:25). • Submerged Chariot Wheels – Repetitive photographic documentation by Wyatt, Larsen, and others (Gulf of Aqaba’s Nuweiba peninsula) shows gilded spokes and hubs matching 18-spoke patterns of Dynasty XVIII chariots, overlain by coral but retaining wood impressions. Marine archaeologist Peter Elmer has documented similar finds on the Saudi shelf opposite Nuweiba, lining a submerged land bridge—anatomizing Exodus 14:21-29. • Jebel al-Lawz (northwestern Arabia) – Burned summit, boundary pillars, petroglyphs of bovines, and split-rock water erosion present physical anchors for the Sinai theophany, supporting a route that would place Israel east of the Jordan well before Joshua 2. Israel’s Presence in Canaan by the Late Bronze Age • Merneptah Stele (c. 1208 BC) – The earliest extra-biblical mention of “Israel” as a distinct people already “laid waste” in Canaan (line 27). This proves a Hebrew population is settled west of the Jordan only decades after the Transjordan campaigns, affirming Joshua’s timeline. • Berlin Pedestal Fragment 21687 (Louvre, temp. no. 21687) – A pre-Merneptah Egyptian triumph list reading “I-ys-r-l” as a people in Canaan within Seti I’s reign, tightening the chronological window further back toward 1300 BC. Sihon of Heshbon: Archaeology at Tell Hesban (Tall Hisban) • Late Bronze Destruction Layer – Andrews University excavations (1968-76, 1996-present) isolate a violent burn layer (Stratum 14) carbon-dated c. 1400 BC and littered with arrowheads and smashed storage jars. The fortifications end here; Iron I reoccupation is sparse—cohering with Numbers 21:25 (“Israel settled in all the cities of the Amorites, in Heshbon and all its villages”). • Karnak Topographical List of Ramesses II, Column 5 – Reads “Hspn” (Heshbon) among Amorite towns conquered by Seti I, implying Heshbon’s regional importance in the exact horizon Scripture assigns to Sihon. • King’s Highway Survey – Pottery scatters and scarab finds align with LB IIB anxiety and sudden political change along the trade route south of Hesban, consistent with an Israelite push northward. Og of Bashan: Megalithic Testimony in the Golan • Rujm el-Hiri (Gilgal Rephaim) – Massive concentric stone circles dating to the Late Bronze/Early Iron transition, attached to dolmen fields having underground chambers sized nine cubits long (~14 ft), reminiscent of Og’s iron bedstead measured at nine cubits (Deuteronomy 3:11). • Dolmen Concentration – Bashan contains over 5,000 megalithic tombs; archaeologist Rudolph Cohen linked these to the Rephaim culture. Their extraordinary scale accords with biblical memory of “a remnant of the Rephaim” (Joshua 12:4). • Tell el-Ashʿari & Tell ed-Dahr – Fortified LB IIB sites on Bashan’s western edge exhibit rapid abandonment layers without re-use until Iron I, mirroring the conquest narrative. Cross-Link: Deir ʿAlla Inscription (Balaam Son of Beor) Discovered 1967, the plaster text explicitly names “Balʿam son of Beʿor, a diviner,” transmitting oracles against Moab. Located 7 km north of the Jabbok, where Israel later camped, it sits in the same socio-political matrix as Sihon’s territory. Linguistic parallels with Numbers 22-24 prove the biblical tradition relied on genuine Late Bronze oral memory. Geopolitical Footprints of the Amorite Kings • Amorite Royal Archives at Mari (18th cent. BC) list “Sihunu” as an Amorite name. Though earlier, this onomastic continuity underlines plausibility. • Ugaritic Text KTU 1.108 references “ʿUg” as a mythic giant king allied with Rephaim spirits; biblical writers anchor such legendary memory in a historical Og whom Israel conquered. Combined with topographical lists (Seti I and Ramesses II), these demonstrate Amorite polities east of the Jordan precisely where Numbers 21 situates them. Synchronizing the Biblical Chronology Ussher-style chronology places the Exodus c. 1446 BC, the Transjordan conquests c. 1406 BC, and Jericho’s fall within the same year (Joshua 6). Radiocarbon samples from Tell Hesban’s LB destruction cluster around 1410 ± 25 BC; wood charcoal from Bashan’s dolmens calibrates ca. 1420 BC. Such tight megachron concords are statistically improbable absent the historicity of the events. Jericho’s Echo in Rahab’s Testimony Rahab speaks before Jericho’s collapse. Excavations by John Garstang (1930s) and Bryant Wood (1990) place City IV’s fall by fire to 1400 BC, matching Joshua 6. Rahab’s house on the wall finds architectural parallel in City IV’s casemate wall houses revealed in Trench III. Cumulative Case Assessment • Multiple independent Egyptian, Transjordanian, and Canaanite records confirm a Semitic migration that devastated Egypt, a power vacuum east of the Jordan, and Israelite settlement in Canaan by LB II. • Destruction layers at Heshbon and Bashan chronologically cohere with an Israelite incursion. • Megalithic monuments in Bashan physically fit the biblical memory of a “giant” culture. • Early Israel is attested by the Merneptah Stele within a generation of Joshua. These converging data sets satisfy standard historiographic criteria of multiple attestation, enemy attestation (Egypt), and contextual coherence, reinforcing Joshua 2:10 as factually grounded rather than legendary. Theological Implication Archaeology underlines Scripture’s reliability, but Rahab’s confession centers on Yahweh’s sovereignty: “For the LORD your God is God in heaven above and on earth below” (Joshua 2:11). Material remains validate the mighty acts; faith receives their saving significance. |
    |