Joab's allegiance in 1 Kings 1:7?
What does Joab's allegiance in 1 Kings 1:7 reveal about his character and motivations?

Text Under Consideration

“Adonijah conferred with Joab son of Zeruiah and with Abiathar the priest, and they supported Adonijah.” (1 Kings 1:7)


Narrative Setting

David is bedridden. Nathan the prophet and Bathsheba know the LORD has designated Solomon as David’s successor (1 Kings 1:13; cf. 2 Samuel 7:12–14; 1 Chronicles 22:8–10). Adonijah, the eldest surviving son, stages a coronation at En-rogel (1 Kings 1:9). Joab, Israel’s long-standing commander, sides with him.


Joab’s Track Record Prior to 1 Kings 1:7

• Brilliant strategist who captured Jerusalem’s citadel (2 Samuel 5:8).

• Loyal in public yet repeatedly unauthorised in action: murdered Abner (2 Samuel 3:26-27), killed Absalom despite David’s explicit order (2 Samuel 18:14), assassinated Amasa (2 Samuel 20:10).

• Maintained unrivaled military authority for four decades, overshadowing priest, prophet, and court.


Political Calculation in the Succession Crisis

1. SELF-PRESERVATION. Benaiah son of Jehoiada now commands David’s personal bodyguard (2 Samuel 23:20-23). If Solomon becomes king, Benaiah is the obvious choice for army chief (1 Kings 2:35). Joab’s power would end—and his bloodguilt (1 Kings 2:5) would likely be prosecuted.

2. CONTINUITY OF STATUS. Adonijah promises Joab a preserved command structure (“he prepared chariots and horsemen and fifty men to run before him,” 1 Kings 1:5—an echo of Absalom’s earlier coup Joab once suppressed).

3. TRIBAL POLITICS. Both Joab and Adonijah are Judeans from the clan of Hezron; Solomon’s elevation by the prophet Nathan and priest Zadok appears court-orchestrated, not tribal.

4. EXCLUSION FROM DIVINE REVELATION. Joab ignores prophetic testimony that the LORD “chose Solomon” (1 Chronicles 28:5-7). He acts on human seniority rather than divine decree.


Spiritual Assessment

The Mosaic law warned against siding with the mighty over the right (Exodus 23:2). Joab’s decision repeats Korah’s error—challenging divinely appointed leadership (Numbers 16). It also foreshadows the nation’s later rejection of the Son of David, Jesus, in favor of human power structures (John 19:15).


Character Traits Revealed

• PRAGMATIC AMBITION: Joab aligns with whomever safeguards his rank.

• LOYALTY TO SELF ABOVE KING: Though publicly David’s nephew, he circumvents David’s will whenever it conflicts with his agenda.

• MORAL CALLOUSNESS: Past murders were rationalized as “revenge” or “justice” (2 Samuel 3:27; 20:10). Joining Adonijah is consistent with disregard for lawful process.

• FEAR CLOTHED AS BOLDNESS: By betting on Adonijah, Joab attempts to outrun the reckoning his conscience anticipates (cf. 1 Kings 2:28).


Motivational Analysis (Behavioral Science Lens)

High-competence individuals with chronic impunity often display:

– Power-maintenance motivation eclipsing ethical considerations.

– Strategic coalition-building with other threatened elites (Abiathar likewise faced demotion by Zadok).

Joab’s behavior fits this profile.


Consequences Foretold and Fulfilled

David later orders Solomon: “Do not let his gray head go down to Sheol in peace” (1 Kings 2:6). Joab’s grasp for security guarantees the opposite; he is executed at the altar (1 Kings 2:28-34) by Benaiah, the very rival he feared.


Theological Implications

Aligning with a counterfeit king is rebellion against God’s revealed plan. Just as Joab’s allegiance determined his earthly fate, one’s allegiance to or rejection of the risen Christ determines eternal destiny (John 3:36; Acts 4:12).


Archaeological and Textual Reliability Note

Tel Dan Stele (9th c. BC) confirms a historical “House of David,” anchoring Kings in real history. The Ketef Hinnom amulets (~7th c. BC) preserve priestly blessing language found in Numbers, illustrating textual stability. Dead Sea Scroll fragments of Samuel-Kings (4Q51) align closely with the Masoretic tradition, underscoring manuscript fidelity.


Practical Application

Believers must place loyalty to God’s anointed—ultimately Jesus—above career, politics, or self-interest (Matthew 6:24). Temporary power gained by rebellion ends in judgment; humble submission to the rightful King brings life everlasting (1 Peter 5:6).

How does 1 Kings 1:7 reflect the political dynamics of King David's court?
Top of Page
Top of Page