How does Joshua 10:35 align with the concept of a loving God? Text and Immediate Context (Joshua 10:35) “That day they captured the city and put it to the sword. The king as well as every person in it they devoted to destruction; he left no survivors. And he did to the king of Libnah as he had done to the king of Jericho.” Libnah’s fall occurs in the middle of a rapid southern campaign. Five Amorite kings had attacked Gibeon (10:5), God miraculously halted the sun (10:12–14), and the Israelite army pressed on while the fugitives still fled. Joshua 10:35 is therefore one sentence in a larger judicial act already under way. Divine Love and Divine Justice: One Character, Not Two Scripture never portrays love and judgment as contradictory. “Righteousness and justice are the foundation of Your throne; loving devotion and faithfulness go before You” (Psalm 89:14). A God who refuses to confront entrenched evil would not be loving; He would be indifferent. His love for His creation demands that He eliminate what destroys it (cf. Nahum 1:2–3; Revelation 20:11–15). Four Centuries of Patience Before the Ban God informed Abram, “In the fourth generation your descendants will return here, for the iniquity of the Amorites is not yet complete” (Genesis 15:16). From Abraham (~2000 BC) to Joshua (~1400 BC on a conservative chronology) God withheld judgment roughly 400 years, giving Canaanite culture ample time to repent. Deuteronomy 9:4–5 explicitly disavows Israel’s merit and cites Canaanite wickedness as the judicial cause. The Moral Corruption of the Canaanites—Biblical and Extra-Biblical Witness Leviticus 18:24–30 and 20:1–23 catalog rampant incest, bestiality, ritual prostitution, and child sacrifice. Excavations at Carthage (a later Phoenician colony preserving the same religious system) reveal tens of thousands of urns containing infant bones burned to Baal-Hammon. Ugaritic tablets (14th century BC) confirm cultic sex and bloodletting. The Amarna Letters (EA 286, 289) from Canaanite rulers plead for Egyptian help against “Habiru” raiders while testifying to local chaos and violence. God did not exterminate innocent peoples; He judged cultures already devouring their own children (Jeremiah 7:31). Cherem (ḥērem)—Devotion to Destruction as Holy Quarantine The term translated “devoted to destruction” signals a judicial ban, not ethnic cleansing. It removed malignant spiritual practices so Israel would not imitate them (Deuteronomy 7:2–6). Like a surgeon excising gangrenous tissue to save a life, God’s judgment preserved a covenant nation through whom Messiah—and global salvation—would come (Genesis 12:3; Galatians 3:8). Protection of the Messianic Line and the World’s Redemption If Canaanite idolatry had swallowed Israel, there would be no Davidic kingdom, no Isaiah 53, no empty tomb. Love for all nations therefore lay behind the hard surgery performed on Libnah. “Through your offspring all nations on earth will be blessed” (Genesis 22:18). That offspring is Christ, whose resurrection (1 Corinthians 15:3–8) grants eternal life to anyone—Canaanite, Israelite, or modern skeptic—who repents and believes (Acts 17:30–31). Hyperbolic War Idiom, Yet Historical Reality Ancient Near-Eastern battle reports routinely use sweeping phrases (“left no survivors,” “totally destroyed”) while the broader narrative shows stragglers remaining (cf. Joshua 13:1). Judges 1 lists Canaanites still present after Joshua. Scripture is accurate; the idiom signals decisive victory, not literal extermination of every last noncombatant. Archaeological Corroboration of the Conquest • Tel Burna (probable Libnah) reveals a Late Bronze destruction layer dated by pottery and radiocarbon roughly 1400–1350 BC, matching the biblical timetable. • Jericho’s fallen, mud-brick city wall—re-excavated by Bryant Wood—shows seasonal timing after spring harvest (cf. Joshua 3:15; 5:10). • Lachish Letters (ca. 586 BC) recall earlier city destructions, illustrating a pattern of siege warfare consistent with Joshua 10’s rapid campaign sequence. Consistent Portrait of God from Joshua to Jesus God judges sin at Jericho and the cross alike; the difference is who bears the penalty. At Libnah the residents themselves absorbed it. At Calvary the sinless Son did. “God made Him who knew no sin to be sin on our behalf” (2 Corinthians 5:21). Divine love reaches apex precisely because divine justice is satisfied in Christ (Romans 3:25–26). Philosophical and Behavioral Reflection Objective moral values demand an objective moral Lawgiver. If torturing infants to Molech is truly evil (a moral intuition virtually universal), then moral realism holds, and so does the necessity of judgment. A loving God who never acts against such evil would contradict that very love. Behavioral science also observes that unchecked cruelty escalates; decisive intervention prevents larger loss (Romans 13:4 analogically). Pastoral and Evangelistic Application 1. Take sin seriously; Christ’s cross shows both God’s wrath and mercy. 2. Do not confuse divine patience with permissiveness (2 Peter 3:9). 3. Recognize God’s heart even in judgment: “I take no pleasure in the death of the wicked, but rather that they turn from their ways and live” (Ezekiel 33:11). 4. Proclaim the same grace Rahab experienced (Joshua 6:25)—proof that any willing heart, even within a judged culture, can be spared. Synthesis Joshua 10:35 depicts the climactic moment of a centuries-deferred, morally warranted judgment executed to protect a redemptive storyline culminating in Jesus Christ. Divine justice there is an expression of divine love—love for future generations, for Israel, and ultimately for every tribe and tongue offered salvation through the risen Lord. |
    |