How does Matthew 21:36 reflect the rejection of prophets in biblical history? Canonical Citation Matthew 21:36 — “Again he sent other servants, more than the first group. But they treated them the same way.” Literary Setting Matthew places this sentence in the Parable of the Vineyard Tenants (Matthew 21:33-46). Jesus is standing in the temple courts (Matthew 21:23) confronting chief priests and elders. The “servants” symbolize God-sent prophets; the escalating violence forecasts Israel’s climactic rejection of the Son Himself (21:37-39) and the consequent loss of covenant privilege (21:43). Progressive Intensification in the Parable 1. First delegation: “his servants” (21:35) — initial prophetic voices (e.g., Moses-Samuel era). 2. Second delegation: “other servants, more than the first” (21:36) — a larger, later company (eighth-to sixth-century prophets through post-exilic voices). 3. Final emissary: “his son” (21:37) — the Messiah. Matthew 21:36 therefore signals both repetition (“again”) and escalation (“more”). Historically, each fresh wave of prophets met heightened resistance, fulfilling 2 Chronicles 36:15-16: “but they mocked God’s messengers, despised His words, and scoffed at His prophets, until the wrath of the LORD rose against His people.” Old Testament Chronicle of Rejected Prophets • Moses — grumbled against (Exodus 17:3) and nearly stoned (Numbers 14:10). • Samuel — dismissed when Israel demanded a king (1 Samuel 8:7). • Elijah — hunted by Jezebel; prophets killed in mass (1 Kings 18:4; 19:2). • Micaiah ben Imlah — struck and imprisoned (1 Kings 22:24-27). • Elisha — taunted (2 Kings 2:23). • Zechariah son of Jehoiada — stoned in the temple court (2 Chronicles 24:20-22). • Isaiah — rabbinic tradition (b. Yev. 49b; Lives of the Prophets 5) records death under Manasseh. • Jeremiah — beaten, put in stocks (Jeremiah 20:2), thrown into a cistern (Jeremiah 38:6). • Uriah son of Shemaiah — executed by Jehoiakim (Jeremiah 26:20-23). • Ezekiel — audience “would not listen” (Ezekiel 3:7). • Post-exilic prophets Haggai, Zechariah, Malachi — met apathy (Haggai 1:2; Zechariah 7:11-12; Malachi 3:7). Nehemiah 9:26 summarizes: “They killed Your prophets, who admonished them.” Matthew 21:36 echoes this rehearsal of covenant infidelity. Second-Temple and Extra-Biblical Witness • Dead Sea Scrolls (4QpNah; 4QHab) lament Jerusalem’s resistance to inspired teachers, corroborating a long-standing pattern. • Josephus, Antiquities 10.44-46, confirms Jeremiah’s persecution and Uriah’s death. • The Baruch bullae (excavated City of David, 1975) and Gemariah’s seal (2005) verify names tied to Jeremiah 36, grounding prophetic narratives in tangible strata dated to the late seventh century BC (calibrated Ussher chronology: c. 608 BC). New Testament Recognition of the Pattern • Luke 11:47-50: “you build tombs for the prophets… your fathers killed.” • Acts 7:52: “Which of the prophets did your fathers not persecute?” • Hebrews 11:36-38 cites scourging, chains, stoning, sawing, exile — a sweeping allusion to Jewish martyrologies. Matthew 21:36 thus functions as a narrative shorthand for a well-attested historical trajectory affirmed by Jesus, the apostles, and subsequent Christian proclamation. Theological Significance 1. Covenant Grace: God “again… sent” proves His longsuffering (cf. 2 Peter 3:9). 2. Human Depravity: Rejection intensifies despite multiplied evidences. 3. Judicial Hardening: Persistent refusal sets the stage for vineyard transfer (Matthew 21:43) and eventual judgment (AD 70 foreshadow; cf. Josephus, War 6.271-283). 4. Messianic Climax: The Son’s sending is the ultimate revelation (Hebrews 1:1-2); prior prophetic martyrdom prefigures His crucifixion and vindicating resurrection (Matthew 28:6). Conclusion Matthew 21:36 encapsulates centuries of prophetic rejection, confirmed by Scripture, intertestamental literature, archaeological data, and first-century testimony. It underscores divine persistence, human resistance, and the prophetic crescendo that finds resolution in Jesus the Messiah. |
    |