How does Matthew 27:26 reflect on the concept of justice in the Bible? Text “So Pilate released Barabbas to them. But he had Jesus flogged, and handed Him over to be crucified.” — Matthew 27:26 Historical–Legal Backdrop 1. Roman jurisprudence theoretically prized iustitia, yet governors such as Pontius Pilate retained wide discretion and feared riots (Josephus, Ant. 18.3.1). 2. Jewish custom at Passover allowed the release of a prisoner (Matthew 27:15–18). This “clemency” becomes a travesty when it liberates an insurrectionist (Mark 15:7). 3. Flogging (φραγελλώσας) preceded crucifixion; it was illegal for Roman citizens but common for provincials, evidencing a two-tiered system that already violated the biblical demand for impartial justice (Deuteronomy 16:19). BIBLICAL CONCEPT OF JUSTICE (Mishpat) Old Testament justice is rooted in God’s character (Deuteronomy 32:4). It involves: • Impartiality (Leviticus 19:15) • Protection of the innocent (Proverbs 17:15) • Punishment of the guilty (Numbers 35:31) Matthew 27:26 illustrates every principle inverted: the innocent suffers; the guilty escapes; the judge capitulates to mob pressure. Theological Significance—Substitutionary Pattern 1. Passover Typology: Barabbas (“son of the father”) walks free while the true Son of the Father is sacrificed, echoing the first Passover lamb (Exodus 12:13; 1 Corinthians 5:7). 2. Scapegoat Parallel: On the Day of Atonement one goat was released, the other slain (Leviticus 16:20-22). Jesus becomes the sin-bearing victim; Barabbas becomes the liberated scapegoat. 3. Prophetic Fulfillment: Isaiah 53:5 foretells the wounding of the Servant “for our transgressions,” satisfying divine justice (Romans 3:25-26). Divine Justice Through Human Injustice Scripture teaches that God sovereignly employs human wrongdoing to accomplish righteous ends (Genesis 50:20; Acts 2:23). Pilate’s miscarriage of justice becomes the mechanism by which God upholds ultimate justice—atonement for sinners. The resurrection (Matthew 28:5-6) vindicates Christ and proves that divine justice cannot be thwarted (Acts 17:31). Moral Psychology Of The Scene Crowd contagion (Matthew 27:20-23) reveals how collective emotion can suppress moral reasoning—an observable phenomenon in social science. Pilate’s hand-washing ritual (v.24) illustrates moral disengagement: shifting responsibility rather than upholding justice, contradicting Micah 6:8’s call “to act justly.” New Testament Commentary On Justice • Peter: “The Righteous One suffered for the unrighteous” (1 Peter 3:18). • Paul: God “made Him who knew no sin to be sin for us” (2 Corinthians 5:21). Both writers identify the event in 27:26 as the fulcrum of restorative justice—God remains just while justifying believers (Romans 3:26). Ethical Implications For Believers 1. Defend the innocent and oppose judicial corruption (Proverbs 31:8-9; James 2:1-4). 2. Recognize that personal salvation rests on accepting the innocent Christ’s substitution, not one’s own merit (Ephesians 2:8-9). 3. Await final rectification when Christ judges impartially (2 Timothy 4:8; Revelation 19:11). Conclusion Matthew 27:26 exposes the bankruptcy of human courts while spotlighting God’s redemptive justice. The verse serves as a microcosm of the Gospel: the innocent condemned so the guilty may go free, fulfilling Scripture, satisfying divine righteousness, and calling every observer to repentance and faith in the risen, just Judge. |
    |