What does Saul's action in 1 Samuel 28:7 reveal about his faith in God? Text Of 1 Samuel 28:7 “Then Saul said to his servants, ‘Find me a woman who is a medium, so I may go and inquire of her.’ ‘There is a medium in Endor,’ they replied.” Immediate Context For years Saul had enjoyed prophetic counsel through Samuel and direct guidance from the Lord by means of the Urim (1 Samuel 28:6). When God no longer answered him—because of Saul’s unrepentant disobedience (cf. 1 Samuel 15:22-23)—the king sought a forbidden alternative, revealing the depth of his spiritual crisis. Historical And Cultural Background Ancient Near-Eastern monarchs routinely consulted diviners before battle, yet Israel’s covenant relationship with Yahweh set the nation apart (Exodus 19:5-6). God expressly outlawed necromancy: “There must not be found among you … a medium or spiritist … for whoever does these things is detestable to the LORD” (Deuteronomy 18:10-12; Leviticus 20:6). Ironically, Saul himself had previously enforced this ban (1 Samuel 28:3). Saul’S Spiritual Decline 1. Rebellion: From 1 Samuel 13 onward Saul repeatedly substituted pragmatism for obedience. 2. Rash vows and selective obedience (1 Samuel 14; 15) eroded his sensitivity to God’s voice. 3. Envy of David, murderous pursuits, and reliance on human strength replaced trust in God (1 Samuel 18-26). By 1 Samuel 28 Saul’s heart was hardened, illustrating Romans 1:21-23 long before it was penned. Violation Of God’S Law Saul’s action constitutes: • Direct disobedience to explicit commands (Leviticus 19:31; Deuteronomy 18:10-12). • Reversal of his own edict against mediums (1 Samuel 28:3). • Usurpation of prophetic authority; he attempts to manipulate the supernatural rather than submit to it. Scripture consistently treats such consultation as spiritual adultery (Isaiah 8:19-20; 2 Kings 21:6), affirming the unity of biblical ethics across centuries. Faithlessness Exposed Faith, biblically, is trust in God’s character and word (Hebrews 11:6). Saul’s resort to Endor displays: • Distrust of God’s sovereignty—he fears the Philistines more than he reveres Yahweh. • Desperation born of unrepentance—he wants information, not reconciliation. • A functional atheism—though acknowledging God with his lips (1 Samuel 28:15), he denies Him by his deeds (Titus 1:16). Contrast With David And Samuel David, in identical military crises, “inquired of the LORD” (1 Samuel 23:2; 30:8). Samuel, even in death, speaks God’s unaltered judgment (1 Samuel 28:16-19). The narrative spotlights authentic faith vs. Saul’s syncretistic expediency. Psychological And Behavioral Insight Research on religious coping notes a distinction between “deferring” (trusting God) and “self-directing” (taking control). Saul exemplifies the maladaptive “pleading for magic” style—seeking illicit control when legitimate avenues seem closed. Cognitive dissonance arises: he knows necromancy is wrong yet rationalizes that “extraordinary times require extraordinary measures,” illustrating moral disengagement mechanisms documented in behavioral science. Theological Implications 1. Revelation is God-initiated; humans cannot compel it (Proverbs 29:18; John 3:27). 2. Apostasy is progressive; small compromises culminate in blatant rebellion (James 1:14-15). 3. God may grant a terrifying answer when people persist in forbidden pursuits (Ezekiel 14:4; 2 Thessalonians 2:11). Consequences Confirmed Samuel’s post-mortem prophecy—Saul and his sons will die tomorrow (1 Samuel 28:19)—is fulfilled in 1 Samuel 31. Archaeological discoveries at Beth-shan (where Saul’s body was hung) corroborate the site’s Philistine occupation in the late Iron Age, supporting the narrative’s historical reliability. Practical Application Believers today must: • Seek God through authorized means—Scripture, prayer, and Spirit-guided community. • Repent quickly from incremental disobedience. • Reject occult explorations (horoscopes, mediums, spiritism) that masquerade as harmless. Unbelievers are warned that rejecting God’s voice inevitably leads to darker substitutes, yet offered the same grace Saul spurned: forgiveness and guidance through the risen Christ. Conclusion Saul’s action in 1 Samuel 28:7 reveals a collapse of genuine faith, replaced by fear-driven, syncretistic desperation. It exposes the mortal peril of turning from God’s revealed word to forbidden spiritual shortcuts and stands as a timeless admonition: true faith waits on the Lord, obeys His commands, and trusts His sovereign timing—even in the silence. |
    |