Why did Saul question Jonathan about David's absence in 1 Samuel 20:27? Setting the Scene: The New Moon Banquet • 1 Samuel 20:24–26 describes a two-day New Moon festival at Saul’s court. • Attendance at the royal table was mandatory for leading officers (cf. 1 Samuel 20:5, 25). • On the first day Saul assumed David was “unclean” and therefore ceremonially disqualified (Leviticus 7:20-21; 15:16). • When David’s seat was still empty on the second day, the ordinary explanation no longer held. The Significance of an Empty Seat • Royal banquets were public affirmations of loyalty; absence suggested rebellion (2 Samuel 16:1-3). • David’s place was conspicuously vacant because Saul himself had assigned it (1 Samuel 20:25). • Two consecutive absences signaled intentional avoidance rather than accidental impurity. Saul’s Underlying Motives 1. Suspicion of Conspiracy – Saul already “eyed David from that day on” (1 Samuel 18:9) and had twice tried to spear him (1 Samuel 18:10-11; 19:9-10). – David’s continued success and popularity fed Saul’s fear that the kingdom would shift to David (1 Samuel 18:7-8; 20:31). 2. Need for Confirmation – Saul knew Jonathan and David were close (1 Samuel 18:1-4). – By questioning Jonathan, Saul hoped to expose whether his own son was protecting David. 3. Desire to Control – Saul demanded strict accountability from his officers (cf. 1 Samuel 14:24-30). – Confronting Jonathan allowed Saul to reassert authority and prepare to act against David if necessary. Jonathan Caught in the Middle • Jonathan had agreed with David on a test: “If your father misses me at all…” (1 Samuel 20:6). • Saul’s inquiry forced Jonathan to deliver the pre-arranged explanation about a family sacrifice in Bethlehem (1 Samuel 20:28-29). • Saul’s violent reaction that followed (1 Samuel 20:30-33) proved David’s fear was well-founded. Spiritual Lessons for Today • Persistent sin breeds suspicion; Saul’s jealousy made him interpret a simple absence as betrayal (Proverbs 28:1). • True friendship protects the innocent even at personal cost, as Jonathan shielded David (John 15:13). • God’s sovereignty overrules human schemes—Saul’s efforts only advanced the divine plan to place David on the throne (1 Samuel 16:1, 13; Psalm 89:20-24). |