Why did Saul want to kill David despite his victory over Goliath in 1 Samuel 19:5? Canonical Context David’s victory over Goliath (1 Samuel 17) publicly confirmed the divine choice already made in private (1 Samuel 16:13). Saul, having forfeited the kingdom through disobedience (1 Samuel 13:13-14; 15:26-28), was told “The LORD has torn the kingdom of Israel from you this day” (1 Samuel 15:28). Thus every subsequent success enjoyed by David threatened Saul’s fragile grip on power. Prophetic Displacement And Royal Insecurity Samuel’s words guaranteed Saul’s dynasty would not endure. When the women of Israel sang, “Saul has slain his thousands, and David his ten thousands” (1 Samuel 18:7), Saul immediately deduced, “What more can he have but the kingdom?” (1 Samuel 18:8). From that day he “kept a jealous eye on David” (1 Samuel 18:9). Political self-preservation, therefore, lay at the core of Saul’s lethal intent. Jealousy As A Moral And Psychological Corrosive Scripture identifies envy as “rottenness of the bones” (Proverbs 14:30). Behavioral science corroborates that status-threat jealousy produces hostility and irrational aggression. Saul displays classic symptoms: rumination (1 Samuel 18:11), escalating threat perception (1 Samuel 18:12, 15), and repeated homicidal attempts (1 Samuel 18:11; 19:1, 10; 20:33). His jealousy was not mere emotion; it became entrenched sin (James 3:16). The Departure Of Yahweh’S Spirit And Demonic Torment “The Spirit of the LORD departed from Saul, and an evil spirit from the LORD began to torment him” (1 Samuel 16:14). The Hebrew ruach ra‘ah can denote a demonic agitator allowed by divine judgment. Episodes of “raving in his house” (1 Samuel 18:10) coincide with attempts on David’s life, revealing spiritual warfare behind the king’s violence (Ephesians 6:12). David As A Covenant Threat Jonathan’s covenant with David (1 Samuel 18:3-4) signaled elite support shifting toward David. Ancient Near Eastern treaty customs meant the transfer of robe, armor, and weapons symbolized succession. Saul saw this as concrete evidence that even his heir favored David’s eventual accession (1 Samuel 20:30-31). The Sin Of Shedding Innocent Blood Jonathan’s protest in 1 Samuel 19:5—“Why then would you sin against innocent blood by killing David without cause?”—invokes Deuteronomy 19:10. Saul’s willingness to violate Torah underscores the depth of his rebellion and spiritual decline (cf. Deuteronomy 27:25). Theological Subtext: God’S Sovereign Choice Yahweh “does not see as man sees” (1 Samuel 16:7). Saul’s murderous pursuit dramatizes the conflict between human monarchy and divine kingship. By sparing David repeatedly (1 Samuel 24; 26), God showcases providence: “No wisdom, no understanding, no counsel can prevail against the LORD” (Proverbs 21:30). Messianic Typology David, the anointed yet persecuted king-in-waiting, prefigures Christ, who though rejected by rulers, was ultimately exalted (Psalm 2; Acts 13:33-37). Saul’s hostility foreshadows the Sanhedrin’s reaction to Jesus: fear of losing position (John 11:48) leading to homicidal plotting, thus reinforcing Scripture’s cohesive narrative arc. Ethical And Devotional Applications 1. Guard the heart against envy; it mutates victory into threat (Proverbs 4:23). 2. Recognize spiritual warfare; absence of the Spirit invites destructive influence (Galatians 5:22-23 vs. Ephesians 2:2). 3. Trust divine timing; God protects His purposes even amid systemic hostility (Romans 8:28). 4. Honor covenant relationships; Jonathan models fidelity over nepotism (Proverbs 17:17). Summary Answer Saul sought David’s death because David’s triumph accentuated Saul’s disqualification, triggered deep-seated envy, magnified the threat to dynastic continuity, and collided with Saul’s demonic torment and hardened rebellion. The episode exemplifies the outworking of divine sovereignty, the perils of unchecked jealousy, and the certainty that God’s anointed will ultimately prevail. |
    |