Why did the disciples return home in John 20:10 without understanding the resurrection? The Passage in Focus “Then the disciples returned to their homes.” (John 20:10) Immediate Literary Context John 20:1–18 narrates the empty-tomb discovery at dawn on the first day of the week. Mary Magdalene alerts Peter and “the other disciple, the one Jesus loved” (20:2). Both run, observe the linen cloths, and the beloved disciple “saw and believed” in the sense of accepting Mary’s report of an empty tomb (20:8). Verse 9 immediately clarifies the scope of that belief: “For they still did not understand from the Scripture that Jesus had to rise from the dead” . Verse 10 logically records their departure. Jewish Resurrection Expectations First-century Jews anticipated a general resurrection at the end of the age (Daniel 12:2; John 11:24). They did not expect an individual Messiah to rise ahead of that climactic event. Even those who had witnessed Lazarus’ resuscitation viewed it as temporary. This eschatological paradigm explains why, though Jesus repeatedly predicted His personal resurrection (Mark 8:31; 9:31; 10:34), the disciples’ mental grid simply had no category for an immediate, permanent victory over death. Psychological and Emotional Factors 1. Grief-Induced Tunnel Vision: Neurocognitive studies of bereavement show diminished executive processing. The shock of Jesus’ crucifixion only thirty-six hours earlier (by Jewish inclusive reckoning) produced mental fatigue, narrowing perception to the obvious fact of a missing body rather than the theological implications. 2. Fear of Arrest: John 20:19 notes the disciples later assembled “with the doors locked for fear of the Jews.” Returning home afforded temporary refuge while assessing personal safety. 3. Physical Exhaustion: The all-night Passover trials, the trauma of Golgotha, and pre-dawn running to the tomb left them depleted. Home was the natural place to regroup. Scriptural Unpreparedness John expressly states they had not yet integrated Scripture’s testimony. Key texts—Psalm 16:10; Isaiah 53:10–12; Hosea 6:2—would later be expounded by Jesus Himself (Luke 24:27). Until that exposition and the Spirit’s illumination (John 14:26; 16:13), the dots remained unconnected. The Holy Spirit Not Yet Given John 7:39 explains that “the Spirit had not yet been given, because Jesus had not yet been glorified.” Spiritual insight into the resurrection is ultimately a revelatory work of the Spirit (1 Corinthians 2:14). Pentecost was still fifty days away; thus cognitive acknowledgment lagged behind sensory data. Gender and Legal Testimony In first-century Judaism, female testimony lacked court admissibility. While Mary Magdalene’s report initiated the investigation, Peter and John needed to validate the claim personally. Once they confirmed the emptiness of the tomb, the next culturally intelligible step was to gather male witnesses (cf. Luke 24:12 with Luke 24:24). Burial-Site Protocols and Sabbath Law Archaeological studies of Second-Temple tombs (e.g., the Dominus Flevit finds) show families often returned home between initial interment and later ritual visits. Moreover, Jewish law restricted labor on the Sabbath; only at first light after Sabbath could burial concerns resume. Peter and John’s brief inspection and withdrawal align with ordinary piety—observe, leave, and plan the next legal opportunity for further action. Sequential Divine Revelation Throughout Scripture God frequently unveils truth progressively (Isaiah 28:10). Here, revelation moves: 1. Empty tomb observed. 2. Angelic explanation to the women (Matthew 28:5–7). 3. Personal appearance of Jesus to Mary (John 20:14–17). 4. Corporate appearance to the ten (John 20:19–23). 5. Vindication to Thomas (John 20:26–29). Peter and John’s temporary ignorance preserves the sequence, allowing women to become the first heralds—an ironic yet providential validation by a culture-marginalized cohort. Fulfillment of Prophetic Typology The disciples’ withdrawal mirrors prophetic motifs of concealment before revelation: • Elijah fled to Horeb before hearing the still, small voice (1 Kings 19:3–13). • Daniel withdrew after visions until Gabriel’s interpretation arrived (Daniel 8:27). • Thus, retreat functions as a narrative pause that heightens the forthcoming Christophany. Pastoral Application Believers today may possess factual data yet remain puzzled until God grants fuller illumination. The disciples’ journey validates seasons of partial understanding while urging persistence in Scripture and community for clarity. Conclusion The disciples returned home in John 20:10 because their Jewish eschatology, emotional trauma, safety concerns, lack of Spirit-illumined scriptural insight, and cultural-legal factors combined to eclipse full comprehension until the risen Christ personally intervened. Their momentary retreat underscores divine orchestration, preserves the integrity of eyewitness testimony, and magnifies the glory of the subsequent, unequivocal revelation: “Because I live, you also will live” (John 14:19). |
    |