Why is "anointed" key in Lam 4:20?
Why is the "anointed of the LORD" significant in Lamentations 4:20?

Text of Lamentations 4:20

“The LORD’s anointed, the breath of our nostrils, was captured in their pits, he of whom we had said, ‘Under his shadow we will live among the nations.’ ”


Historical Setting

Jerusalem fell to Babylon in 586 BC (cf. 2 Kings 25:1-21; Jeremiah 39:1-7). King Zedekiah, the last Davidic ruler before the exile, fled the city but was seized near Jericho, blinded, and taken to Babylon. The Babylonian Chronicle Tablet BM 21946 records Nebuchadnezzar’s capture of the city in his nineteenth regnal year, corroborating the biblical date. The Lachish Letters, unearthed in the 1930s, speak of the same Babylonian advance on Judah, adding independent witness to the event.


Identity of “the Anointed of the LORD”

“Anointed” (Hebrew māšîaḥ) designates the Davidic king invested with holy oil (1 Samuel 16:12-13; Psalm 2:2). In Lamentations 4:20 the title points specifically to Zedekiah. Yet because the anointing rests on the Davidic line by covenant (2 Samuel 7:12-16), the phrase also carries royal-messianic weight beyond any single monarch.


Covenant and Theological Weight

The king embodied the covenant promise that God would dwell with and protect His people. Losing “the breath of our nostrils” signified more than political collapse; it signaled apparent suspension of the Davidic promise. Hence the verse’s pathos: the one through whom the nation expected divine cover (“Under his shadow we will live”) is in enemy hands. The crisis presses the question of God’s faithfulness—a theme Lamentations wrestles with while still confessing, “Great is Your faithfulness” (Lamentations 3:23).


“Breath of Our Nostrils” – Psychological and National Significance

Breath (Hebrew rûaḥ, nĕshāmâ) is life itself (Genesis 2:7). Calling the king their “breath” expresses how deeply Judah tied its identity and survival to the Davidic throne. The Babylonian victory therefore felt like suffocation of the nation’s very life.


Prophetic and Typological Foreshadowing

The capture of the anointed prefigures the later suffering of the ultimate Anointed. Isaiah foresaw a shoot from Jesse that would be “struck” (Isaiah 11:1-4). Zechariah predicted, “Strike the Shepherd, and the sheep will be scattered” (Zechariah 13:7). Jesus applied such prophecies to Himself (Mark 14:27). Thus Zedekiah’s humiliation becomes a negative type pointing toward Christ’s willing submission to arrest and crucifixion, yet with the critical difference of Christ’s vindicating resurrection.


Comparisons with Other Old Testament Uses

• Saul twice called “the LORD’s anointed” (1 Samuel 24:6) to stress inviolability.

• David, though flawed, remained the anointed whose lamp God would not extinguish (1 Kings 11:36).

• In exilic prayers (Psalm 89:38-45) the apparent rejection of the anointed triggers lament exactly parallel to Lamentations 4:20.


Fulfillment in Jesus the Messiah

The New Testament declares Jesus “Christ” (Greek Christos = Messiah, Anointed). Acts 4:27 cites Psalm 2 in describing Him as “Your holy servant Jesus, Whom You anointed.” Unlike Zedekiah, Jesus is sinless, willingly “captured” (John 18:12) yet conquers death (1 Corinthians 15:3-4). His resurrection secures an eternal throne (Luke 1:32-33) and revalidates every covenant promise. Therefore the despair voiced in Lamentations finds resolution in Him; believers truly “live under His shadow” (cf. Colossians 3:3).


Archaeology and External Corroboration

• Babylonian ration tablets list “Yaūkin, king of Judah,” verifying the exile of Jehoiachin, Zedekiah’s predecessor.

• A seal impression reading “Belonging to Gedaliah, servant of the king” (City of David excavations) fits the administrative milieu of Lamentations.

• Nebuchadnezzar II’s royal inscriptions boast of subduing Judah, aligning with biblical narrative.

These finds anchor Lamentations in verifiable history, reinforcing its theological claims.


Canonical and Redemptive Significance

By portraying the downfall of the anointed, the book exposes the insufficiency of human kingship and heightens anticipation for a perfect ruler. It demonstrates the gravity of covenant breach, the reality of divine judgment, and the steadfastness of ultimate hope—all fulfilled in Jesus. Thus Lamentations 4:20 is significant because:

1. It records a pivotal historical loss that explains the exile.

2. It showcases the depth of Judah’s reliance on the Davidic king.

3. It prophetically gestures toward the suffering-yet-triumphant Messiah.

4. It underscores the unbreakable faithfulness of God, who restores His people through the greater Anointed.


Practical Application

Earthly institutions—even divinely appointed ones—can fail, but the true Anointed never will. Salvation, identity, and security are found “under His shadow” alone (Psalm 91:1-2; John 10:28-29). The verse calls every reader to transfer trust from fallible human structures to the risen Christ, “the same yesterday and today and forever” (Hebrews 13:8).

How does Lamentations 4:20 reflect God's protection over His people?
Top of Page
Top of Page