Topical Bible: Drunkenness: Ben-Hadad and his Thirty-Two Confederate Kings

◄ Drunkenness: Ben-Hadad and his Thirty-Two Confederate Kings ►

Topical Encyclopedia

Biblical Context:

The account of Ben-Hadad and his thirty-two confederate kings is found in 1 Kings 20. Ben-Hadad, the king of Aram (Syria), gathered a coalition of thirty-two kings to wage war against Israel. This narrative highlights the dangers and consequences of drunkenness, particularly in the context of leadership and decision-making during times of conflict.

Scriptural Account:

In 1 Kings 20:1-12, Ben-Hadad besieges Samaria, the capital of the Northern Kingdom of Israel, and sends messengers to King Ahab with demands for silver, gold, wives, and children. Ahab initially agrees to these demands, but when Ben-Hadad's demands escalate, Ahab refuses. Ben-Hadad, confident in his strength and numbers, prepares to attack.

The turning point in the narrative occurs in 1 Kings 20:16, where it is revealed that Ben-Hadad and the thirty-two kings were "drinking themselves drunk in the booths" . This state of inebriation leads to a lack of vigilance and poor decision-making, ultimately contributing to their defeat.

Consequences of Drunkenness:

1. Impaired Judgment:
The account illustrates how drunkenness impairs judgment and decision-making. Ben-Hadad's overconfidence, fueled by alcohol, led him to underestimate the Israelites and ignore the strategic necessities of warfare. Proverbs 20:1 warns, "Wine is a mocker, strong drink is raging: and whosoever is deceived thereby is not wise" .

2. Vulnerability:
The state of inebriation left Ben-Hadad and his allies vulnerable to attack. While they were drinking, the Israelites launched a surprise offensive, taking advantage of the Arameans' lack of preparedness. This vulnerability underscores the biblical admonition to remain sober and vigilant, as seen in 1 Peter 5:8: "Be sober-minded and alert. Your adversary the devil prowls around like a roaring lion, seeking someone to devour" .

3. Divine Intervention:
Despite Israel's smaller numbers, God intervened on their behalf. A prophet assured Ahab of victory, stating, "This is what the LORD says: ‘Do you see this vast army? I will give it into your hand today, and then you will know that I am the LORD’" (1 Kings 20:13). The defeat of Ben-Hadad's forces serves as a testament to God's sovereignty and the futility of relying on human strength and alliances, especially when clouded by drunkenness.

4. Moral and Spiritual Decline:
The narrative also reflects a broader theme of moral and spiritual decline associated with drunkenness. The indulgence of Ben-Hadad and his confederates in alcohol symbolizes a departure from righteous conduct and a disregard for the responsibilities of leadership. Ephesians 5:18 advises, "Do not get drunk on wine, which leads to reckless indiscretion. Instead, be filled with the Spirit" .

Historical and Cultural Insights:

In the ancient Near Eastern context, banquets and drinking were common among royalty and military leaders. However, the excessive indulgence in alcohol often led to compromised leadership and military failures. The account of Ben-Hadad serves as a cautionary tale against the excesses of such practices.

Theological Implications:

The account of Ben-Hadad and his confederate kings underscores the biblical principle that reliance on God, rather than human strength or alliances, is paramount. Drunkenness, as a manifestation of self-reliance and indulgence, stands in stark contrast to the call for sobriety and dependence on divine guidance.

Nave's Topical Index

1 Kings 20:16
And they went out at noon. But Benhadad was drinking himself drunk in the pavilions, he and the kings, the thirty and two kings that helped him.
Nave's Topical Index