How should Christians interpret the command to "drive out all your enemies" in Deuteronomy 6:19? Deuteronomy 6:19—“to drive out all your enemies before you, as the LORD has spoken.” I. Literary Setting Deuteronomy 6 sits within Moses’ second address on the Plains of Moab (Deuteronomy 5–11). Verses 10–19 anticipate Israel’s life in the land by warning against forgetfulness (vv. 10–12) and commanding covenant fidelity (vv. 13–18). Verse 19 climaxes the section: “to drive out all your enemies before you.” The verb garash (“drive out, expel”) is repeated in Exodus 23:28–31; 33:2; Deuteronomy 7:1–2; Joshua 24:12, forming a thematic thread from Sinai to conquest. II. Historical Background 1. Patriarchal Promise – Genesis 15:16 foretold that Israel would enter Canaan after “the iniquity of the Amorites” reached its full measure, connecting the conquest to divine judgment rather than ethnic animus. 2. Chronology – Using the internal date of 1 Kings 6:1 (480 years before Solomon’s temple, c. 966 BC), the exodus occurred c. 1446 BC, placing entry into Canaan c. 1406 BC (Ussher 2553 AM). 3. Archaeological Corroboration – • Jericho: A collapsed mud-brick wall fallen outward, a thick burn layer, and Egyptian storage jars full of charred grain (Garstang; later Wood) match Joshua 6 and a springtime siege. • Hazor: A conflagration layer dated to Late Bronze I aligns with Joshua 11:10–13. Canaanite cuneiform texts from Hazor itself mention king Jabin, recalling Judges 4. • The Merneptah Stele (c. 1208 BC) names “Israel” already established in Canaan within the conservative timeline. • Amarna Letters (EA 286-290) plead for Egyptian aid against the Ḫabiru, a Semitic people pressing the hill country, consonant with Joshua’s campaigns. III. Theological Rationale for the Command 1. Divine Judgment – The Canaanite cultures practiced infant sacrifice (Jeremiah 7:31), ritual prostitution (Deuteronomy 23:17), and pervasive violence (Leviticus 18; 20). “Drive out” thus metes out retributive justice (Psalm 19:9). 2. Covenant Land Grant – The land is Yahweh’s possession (Leviticus 25:23). Israel acts as His vassal steward; expulsion of entrenched evil protects covenant purity (Exodus 34:11–16). 3. Progressive Revelation – God delayed for four centuries (Genesis 15:13–16), demonstrating patience before adjudication (2 Peter 3:9). IV. Scope and Limits of the Directive 1. “Drive out” vs. “Devote to destruction” – Most commands employ garash and yarash (“dispossess”) more than 50 times; ḥerem (“ban/devote”) applies to military centers, not every individual (Deuteronomy 2:34; 20:16–18). 2. Conditional Mercy – Rahab (Joshua 2; 6:25), the Gibeonites (Joshua 9), Caleb’s Kenizzite line (Numbers 32:12) show that repentance grants refuge. 3. Gradual Process – Exodus 23:29–30 promises incremental expulsion to prevent ecological collapse, underscoring stewardship, not genocidal urgency. V. Ethical Considerations & Modern Objections 1. Genocide Claim Answered – The campaign is a time-bound, theocratic judgment, not a model for perpetual violence. The Judge is the same God who spared Nineveh (Jonah 3) and gave His Son (John 3:16). 2. Innocent Life – God, omniscient Creator (Psalm 139), alone determines life’s span; ending temporal life under divine mandate does not preclude eternal mercy (Genesis 18:25). 3. Moral Authority – Without an objective, transcendent Lawgiver, moral critique dissolves into subjectivism (Romans 2:15). Scripture offers the necessary moral ground for declaring anything “wrong.” VI. Canonical Development 1. Old Testament – Repeated failure to drive out idolatry leads to Israel’s exile (Judges 1–3; 2 Kings 17). The pattern reveals the human need for a greater Deliverer. 2. New Testament – Jesus reframes enemy treatment (Matthew 5:44) but affirms God’s right to judge (Matthew 25:41). Hebrews 4:8-11 links Joshua’s conquest to heavenly rest, fulfilled in Christ. 3. Eschatology – Revelation 19 portrays the ultimate, righteous “ban” enacted by the Messiah against cosmic evil, a future antitype to Canaan’s limited pattern. VII. Typological Significance 1. Land → Kingdom of God – Canaan prefigures the new creation where no unclean thing enters (Revelation 21:27). 2. Canaanites → Sin & Powers – Believers “put to death” fleshly deeds (Romans 8:13) and “take captive every thought” (2 Corinthians 10:5). 3. Joshua → Jesus (Yeshua) – Joshua shares the Savior’s name and foreshadows His victory (Hebrews 4:8). VIII. Contemporary Christian Application 1. Spiritual Warfare – “Our struggle is not against flesh and blood” (Ephesians 6:12). Christians “drive out” demonic strongholds through the gospel, prayer, and obedience. 2. Personal Holiness – As Israel was to purge the land, believers must expel habitual sin (Colossians 3:5-10). 3. Mission – While Israel’s mandate was centripetal (protect the land), the Church’s is centrifugal (Matthew 28:18-20), conquering by love and persuasion, not arms. IX. Archaeological & Textual Reliability 1. Manuscript Evidence – Dead Sea Scroll 4QDeut q confirms Deuteronomy 6 wording centuries before Christ, matching the Masoretic Text with only orthographic variance. 2. Septuagint Harmony – LXX’s ekdiōxai (“drive out”) mirrors MT garash, underscoring textual stability across traditions. 3. Trans-Testamental Citation – Jesus cites Deuteronomy 6:13, closely adjacent to v. 19, affirming the chapter’s authority (Matthew 4:10). X. Christological Focus The same Scripture ordering Canaan’s cleansing points to the cross where God drove out our ultimate enemies—sin, death, Satan (Colossians 2:15). The resurrection certifies His victory (1 Corinthians 15:57) and offers every repentant Canaanite of heart full pardon. XI. Summary Deuteronomy 6:19’s command is a unique, theocratic judgment fulfilling ancient promises, preserving covenant purity, and foreshadowing Christ’s definitive triumph. Christians honor its historical reality, defend its morality, and apply its principle by waging spiritual warfare, cultivating holiness, and proclaiming the gospel until the final “driving out” of evil in the new heavens and new earth. |
    |