What does Luke 23:22 mean?
What is the meaning of Luke 23:22?

A third time he said to them

• Pilate is on record three separate times declaring Jesus innocent (Luke 23:4, 14; here v. 22), underscoring God’s providential use of a Roman governor to confirm that no valid charge can be leveled against His Son.

• John’s Gospel repeats the same verdict—“I find no basis for a charge against Him” (John 18:38, 19:4, 6)—highlighting the futility of the accusers’ case.

• Scripture often establishes a matter by “two or three witnesses” (Deuteronomy 19:15). Pilate’s third declaration inadvertently fulfills that standard, adding legal weight to Christ’s innocence before He bears sin on the cross (2 Corinthians 5:21).


What evil has this man done?

• The governor’s rhetorical question exposes the lack of evidence. No crime exists because the Savior is perfectly righteous (1 Peter 2:22; Hebrews 4:15).

• Even those hostile to Jesus could name no wrongdoing (Mark 14:55-56). The crowd’s anger is fueled by envy (Matthew 27:18), not truth.

• Isaiah foretold that Messiah would suffer despite having “done no violence, nor was any deceit in His mouth” (Isaiah 53:9). Pilate unwittingly echoes prophetic testimony.


I have found in Him no offense worthy of death

• Roman justice recognizes what divine justice had already decreed: Jesus is “a lamb without blemish or spot” (1 Peter 1:19).

• Legally, Pilate should have released Him immediately (Acts 3:13-14). His hesitation reveals human compromise, yet God ordains it to advance redemption (Acts 4:27-28).

• The statement aligns with Luke 23:15: “Indeed, He has done nothing deserving death.” Repetition drives home the spotless character of Christ, necessary for a substitutionary sacrifice (Hebrews 9:14).


So after I punish Him, I will release Him

• Hoping to satisfy the mob, Pilate proposes scourging—“Then Pilate took Jesus and had Him flogged” (John 19:1).

• Scourging itself was brutal, yet still short of capital punishment. Pilate imagines a compromise, but the crowd will reject it (Luke 23:23-24).

Isaiah 53:5 foretells that Messiah would be “pierced for our transgressions…by His stripes we are healed.” Even this lesser punishment contributes to the atoning work.

• Pilate’s reluctance to execute an innocent man shows that Jesus’ death is not a legal accident but a divine appointment: “This Man was handed over by God’s set plan and foreknowledge” (Acts 2:23).


summary

Luke 23:22 presents Pilate’s third public declaration of Jesus’ innocence, framed by a probing question, an explicit verdict, and an offer of scourging as a conciliatory gesture. The verse reinforces the spotless righteousness of Christ, fulfills prophetic Scripture, exposes human injustice, and advances God’s sovereign plan of redemption.

What historical evidence supports the events of Luke 23:21?
Top of Page
Top of Page