What historical events might Psalm 85:2 be referencing regarding Israel's sins? Psalm 85:2—Historical Referents to Israel’s National Sins Canonical Text “You forgave the iniquity of Your people; You covered all their sin. Selah.” (Psalm 85:2) Literary Frame and Thematic Summary Verses 1–3 form a single sentence in Hebrew: Yahweh “showed favor,” “restored the captives,” “forgave iniquity,” “covered sin,” “withdrew fury,” and “turned from burning anger.” The introductory clause, “You restored the fortunes of Jacob” (v. 1), signals that some concrete historical reversal has already happened; the speaker now pleads for the full outworking of God’s salvation (vv. 4–13). The psalm is therefore retrospective—recalling a specific national pardon—and prospective—asking for final, visible wholeness. Defining “Forgave” and “Covered” • nâśâʼ ʽāwōn (“forgave iniquity”) describes the lifting or removal of guilt (cf. Exodus 34:7). • kāsâ ḥaṭṭāʾâ (“covered sin”) pictures concealment by atoning sacrifice (cf. Leviticus 16:30). Both verbs appear together in Numbers 14:19 when Moses intercedes after the spy rebellion, suggesting a pattern of covenant failure followed by covenant mercy. Spectrum of Possible Historical Referents 1. Sinai Rebellion and the Golden Calf (c. 1446 B.C.) • Narrative: Exodus 32–34. Yahweh threatens national destruction; Moses pleads; God “forgives” (nâśâʼ) the people (Exodus 34:9). • Why it fits: The exact verb pair of Psalm 85:2 matches Moses’ plea. The crisis was corporate, and forgiveness was immediate yet partial, paralleling the psalm’s “already/not-yet” tone. • Limitations: No “restoration of captivity” language exists at Sinai. 2. Day of Atonement Ordinance (initiated c. 1445 B.C., observed annually) • Text: Leviticus 16. National sins are “covered” (kāsâ) as the scapegoat bears iniquity (v. 22). • Why it fits: Psalm 85’s verbs echo Leviticus 16:30 (“to atone for you, to cleanse you”). The psalm could commemorate a recent Yom Kippur rite after a period of covenant infidelity. • Limitation: The psalm’s captivity reference still calls for a political restoration beyond cultic ritual. 3. Cycles under the Judges (c. 1380–1050 B.C.) • Pattern: National apostasy → foreign oppression → repentance → deliverance (Judges 2:11–19). • Why it fits: “You restored the fortunes” is used repeatedly for relief from oppressors (e.g., Judges 6:7–10). • Limitation: Psalm 85 implies a single, definable captivity rather than a series. 4. Assyrian Invasions and the Fall of Samaria (722 B.C.) • Narrative: 2 Kings 17; 2 Chronicles 30–31. The Northern Kingdom falls; a Judean remnant reunites under Hezekiah, who invites the north to Jerusalem for Passover, and God “heals” the people (2 Chronicles 30:20). • Archaeology: Sargon II’s palace reliefs confirm Samaria’s deportation. • Why it fits: A tangible captivity ended for some Israelites; Hezekiah’s revival is marked by national confession and divine clemency. 5. Hezekiah’s Deliverance from Sennacherib (701 B.C.) • Narrative: 2 Kings 18–19; Isaiah 36–37. God “turns back” Assyria and “heals” Hezekiah (2 Kings 20:5). • Archaeology: The Taylor Prism names Hezekiah and records tribute; the event aligns with massive casualty in Assyrian camp (2 Kings 19:35). • Why it fits: “Withdrew all Your fury” (Psalm 85:3) mirrors the halted siege. However, there was no exile to reverse. 6. Josiah’s Reform (c. 622 B.C.) • Narrative: 2 Kings 22–23. After generations of Manassah’s idolatry, Josiah renews covenant, and Yahweh promises delayed judgment. • Why it fits: National repentance, Passover like none “since the days of the judges” (2 Kings 23:22). Yet no captivity language. 7. Babylonian Exile and Return under Cyrus (605–538 B.C.) • Captivity: 2 Kings 24–25; 2 Chronicles 36. Sins: Idolatry, Sabbath violations, injustice (Jeremiah 25:7–11; Ezekiel 20). • Restoration: Ezra 1–6. Cyrus’ decree (539–538 B.C.) returns exiles and temple vessels. • Archaeology: The Cyrus Cylinder (British Museum) corroborates the policy of repatriating captive peoples and temples. Babylonian ration tablets list Jehoiachin, confirming the exile’s historicity. • Internal corroboration: The prayer of Daniel 9:9 (“To the Lord our God belong compassion and forgiveness, though we have rebelled”) parallels Psalm 85:2 linguistically and thematically. • Why it fits best: Psalm 85:1 explicitly says, “You restored the captivity (šᵑwût) of Jacob,” the exact phrase used of the Babylonian return in Jeremiah 29:14. Post-exilic texts (Nehemiah 9; Haggai 1–2) reflect continuing hardship and a plea for fuller blessing, precisely the tension of Psalm 85. 8. Post-Exilic Confession under Ezra–Nehemiah (458–445 B.C.) • Narrative: Ezra 9–10; Nehemiah 8–10. Mixed marriages and Sabbath neglect threaten the fledgling community; nationwide confession ensues: “You are a forgiving God” (Nehemiah 9:17). • Why it fits: The community has returned but longs for revival—mirroring Psalm 85’s structure. Some scholars date Psalm 85 to this era because temple worship is active (implied by “salvation is near,” v. 9) yet external distress remains. Archaeological and Extra-Biblical Corroboration • Ketef Hinnom silver scrolls (late 7th century B.C.) preserve the Aaronic blessing, proving priestly theology of forgiveness before exile. • Lachish Letters (c. 588 B.C.) reference the Babylonian assault, aligning with the judgment that led to exile. • Elephantine Papyri (5th century B.C.) show expatriate Jews still worshiping Yahweh during the post-exilic era, confirming broad restoration. • The Dead Sea Scroll 11QPsᵃ contains Psalm 85, word-for-word with the Masoretic Text, demonstrating textual stability from at least the 2nd century B.C. onward. Theological Trajectory The historical pardons listed above prefigure the definitive act of atonement accomplished by the risen Messiah, “in whom we have redemption, the forgiveness of sins” (Colossians 1:14). Psalm 85 therefore operates on two planes: (1) tangible national events—most cogently the Babylonian exile and return—and (2) prophetic anticipation of universal reconciliation through Christ’s resurrection (cf. Acts 13:38–39). Conclusion While several Old Testament crises demonstrate God’s readiness to “forgive” and “cover” Israel’s iniquity, the Babylonian captivity and subsequent restoration under Cyrus align most closely with Psalm 85:2’s explicit language of “restored captivity,” widespread repentance, and partial-yet-incomplete national renewal. Other episodes—Sinai, the Judges, Assyrian assaults, Hezekiah’s and Josiah’s reforms, Ezra-Nehemiah’s revival—serve as historical and theological precursors, collectively testifying that Yahweh’s willingness to pardon has been the consistent thread binding Israel’s history and pointing forward to the climactic pardon secured by the resurrected Christ. |
    |