Why did God command the destruction of Achan and his family in Joshua 7:24? TEXT OF THE INCIDENT (Joshua 7:24–25) “Then Joshua, together with all Israel, took Achan son of Zerah, the silver, the cloak, and the bar of gold, his sons and daughters, his oxen, donkeys, and sheep, his tent, and all that he had, and they brought them up to the Valley of Achor. And Joshua said, ‘Why have you brought this trouble upon us? The LORD will trouble you this day.’ Then all Israel stoned them to death. Afterward they burned their bodies and heaped over them a large pile of stones that remains to this day.” Historical Setting Israel has just crossed the Jordan (c. 1406 BC) and taken Jericho by miraculous intervention (Joshua 6). The people are under covenant oath to devote the entire plunder of Jericho to Yahweh’s treasury (6:17-19). The next military objective, Ai, ends in humiliating defeat; God reveals the cause—“Israel has sinned” (7:11). COVENANT FRAMEWORK AND THE LAW OF ḥērem (“DEVOTED THINGS”) Deuteronomy 7:25-26; 20:17 instruct that certain Canaanite cities and their goods be placed under ḥērem—set apart exclusively for God, not for personal use. Violating ḥērem was tantamount to sacrilege (Leviticus 27:28-29). The ban safeguarded Israel from idolatry and underscored God’s ownership of the victory. The Nature And Gravity Of Achan’S Sin Achan confesses, “I coveted… I took… I hid” (7:21). His actions break three explicit commands: • Theft from God (Malachi 3:8) • Coveting (Exodus 20:17) • False witness/cover-up (Exodus 20:16) Because the items were consecrated, the theft was not mere larceny but direct rebellion against Yahweh’s kingship. Corporate Solidarity (Federal Headship) Ancient Israel functioned as a covenant community where the individual represented the clan and the clan the nation. This principle, visible in Adam (Romans 5:12) and Christ (1 Corinthians 15:22), explains God’s statement: “Israel has sinned” (7:11) even though one man acted. Modern readers recoil at corporate liability, yet social research on “collective efficacy” confirms how a single breach destabilizes a group. Why Was The Family Included? • Complicity: The contraband lay buried “inside my tent” (7:21). Given the communal living structure, the family could hardly be ignorant. • Mosaic Law: Deuteronomy 24:16 forbids executing innocent relatives for another’s crime, implying they shared guilt. • Possessions = Evidence: The livestock and tent facilitated concealment; law required both offender and “the accursed things” be destroyed (Deuteronomy 13:15-17). Divine Holiness And Israel’S Mission God’s presence dwelt among Israel (Exodus 29:45-46). Any unconfessed defilement jeopardized the entire redemptive program that would culminate in Messiah (Genesis 12:3). Joshua 7:12: “I will no longer be with you unless you remove the sin.” The severe remedy protected the larger salvific plan. Judicial Procedure And Due Process • Inquiry by lots (Proverbs 16:33) publicly authenticated guilt. • Confession secured before sentence (7:19-21). • Community participation fulfilled Deuteronomy 17:7: “The hands of the witnesses shall be first against him.” Thus the execution, while severe, was not capricious. Theological Implications Achan is a cautionary mirror: hidden sin halts divine blessing (Psalm 66:18). The Valley of Achor (“trouble”) later becomes “a door of hope” (Hosea 2:15), foreshadowing grace that ultimately arrives in Christ, who bears the curse in our place (Galatians 3:13). Addressing Moral Objections God, as Creator, retains rightful authority over life (Deuteronomy 32:39). Justice is not measured by human sentiment but by divine holiness (Isaiah 55:8-9). Analogous New-Covenant episode—Ananias and Sapphira (Acts 5)—confirms that God’s character has not changed; grace does not nullify His purity. Typological And Redemptive Significance The devoted items were to enter Yahweh’s treasury; Christ, the true Treasure, was entirely devoted yet “made sin for us” (2 Corinthians 5:21). Achan’s stoning outside the camp prefigures Jesus suffering “outside the gate” (Hebrews 13:12) to remove our reproach. Contemporary Application • For the church: practice restorative discipline (1 Corinthians 5). • For believers: confess and forsake hidden sin; it harms the community (James 5:16). • For skeptics: the account invites sober reflection on sin’s seriousness and the provision of forgiveness through the resurrected Christ (Romans 10:9-10). Key Takeaways 1. Achan’s judgment illustrates the inviolability of God’s holiness. 2. Corporate responsibility safeguarded Israel’s covenant destiny. 3. The event is historically credible, textually secure, and archaeological findings reinforce its setting. 4. The severity sets the stage for the greater grace offered in the gospel—sin condemned in Christ so that mercy may flow to all who believe. |
    |