Why did Amnon's love for Tamar turn to hatred in 2 Samuel 13:15? Canonical Text “Then Amnon hated her with a very intense hatred; in fact, he hated her more than he had loved her. ‘Get up!’ he said. ‘Be gone!’ ” (2 Samuel 13:15) Immediate Narrative Setting Amnon, firstborn son of King David, has forced himself upon his half-sister Tamar after feigning illness. 2 Samuel 13:1–14 records escalating lust manipulated by Jonadab’s counsel. Verse 14 states, “But Amnon refused to listen to her, and being stronger, he violated her and lay with her” . Verse 15 describes the emotional reversal. Lust Versus Love Scripture distinguishes eros-driven lust from self-giving love. 1 Corinthians 13:5 says love “seeks not its own” . Amnon’s pre-sin emotions were selfish desire (James 1:14–15). Upon gratification, the objectifying nature of lust produced contempt. Contemporary behavioral studies echo this: dopamine-reward spikes followed by disgust when an act violates conscience. Sin promises fulfillment yet yields emptiness and revulsion. Violating God’s Design Leviticus 18:9 forbids sexual relations with a half-sister. Tamar reminded Amnon, “such a thing should not be done in Israel” (2 Samuel 13:12). By crossing that boundary, Amnon assaulted both Tamar and the holy covenant. The conscience, given by a Creator who inscribed moral law on the heart (Romans 2:15), responded with self-loathing projected onto Tamar. Guilt-Driven Repulsion After Eden, shame follows violation (Genesis 3:7–10). Psychologically, unresolved guilt often flips infatuation into hatred because the partner becomes a living reminder of sin. Proverbs 30:20 notes the adulteress who says, “I have done no wrong,” yet in Amnon the opposite occurs: he sees his wrong and lashes out. Power, Objectification, and Discarding Abusive dynamics explain the dismissal: “Get up! Be gone!” He had wanted conquest, not companionship. Modern trauma literature documents that offenders frequently dehumanize victims post-assault to distance themselves from culpability. Consequences of David’s Sin Nathan prophesied: “The sword shall never depart from your house” (2 Samuel 12:10). Amnon mirrors David’s earlier exploitation of Bathsheba. Divine justice permits cascading turmoil, underscoring Galatians 6:7—“whatever a man sows, he will reap” . Pattern of Love-Turned-Hatred in Scripture • Absalom toward Amnon (v. 22) • Saul toward David (1 Samuel 18:9) • The world toward Christ (John 15:18–25) Each case arises from jealousy, guilt, or threatened pride. Archaeological & Cultural Corroboration • The Amarna tablets (14th c. BC) list sibling marriage taboos, paralleling Levitical law. • Excavations at Tel‐Dan confirm Davidic dynasty, anchoring the narrative in real royal politics. Theological Implications Amnon’s hatred illustrates total depravity: even heirs of David need redemption. The episode magnifies the necessity of Christ, the true Son of David, who loves His bride sacrificially (Ephesians 5:25) rather than exploiting her. Pastoral Application 1. Disciplining lust at the thought level (Matthew 5:28). 2. Seeking accountability; note Jonadab’s corrupt influence (1 Corinthians 15:33). 3. Healing for victims: God “binds up the brokenhearted” (Isaiah 61:1). 4. Warning that unrepented sin escalates and harms community. Conclusion Amnon’s “love” was never covenantal; it was self-centered craving. Once satisfied, holy guilt, shame, power misuse, and the violation of divine law converted desire into detestation. The text stands as a Spirit-breathed warning that only love conformed to God’s boundaries endures, and only Christ’s redeeming grace can re-order fallen human affections. |
    |