Why did Joab deceive Amasa with a greeting in 2 Samuel 20:9? Historical and Narrative Setting After Absalom’s rebellion collapsed, David moved quickly to reunite a divided kingdom (2 Samuel 19:9–15). As part of that reconciliation, he dismissed Joab—whose slaying of Absalom had angered him—and appointed Amasa, Absalom’s former commander and David’s nephew, as general (2 Samuel 19:13). Shortly thereafter Sheba son of Bichri incited a fresh revolt (2 Samuel 20:1–2). David ordered Amasa to muster Judah within three days, but the new commander tarried (2 Samuel 20:4–5). With time slipping away, David authorized Abishai to pursue Sheba; Joab, though demoted, marched with Abishai’s men. When Amasa finally arrived at Gibeon, Joab confronted him (2 Samuel 20:8). Joab’s Personal Motivations 1. Loss of Position: Joab had been Israel’s leading military strategist since the conquest of Jerusalem (2 Samuel 5:6–10). David’s choice to elevate Amasa threatened Joab’s prestige, income, and influence at court. 2. Established Pattern: Years earlier Joab used similar treachery to murder Abner, also by drawing him aside under a pretense of peace (2 Samuel 3:26–27). First Kings 2:5 later records both killings as linked in motive and method. 3. Political Calculus: With Sheba’s revolt pending, Joab believed the kingdom could not afford what he judged a hesitant, perhaps untrustworthy, commander who had once led David’s enemies (cf. 2 Samuel 17:25). Eliminating Amasa both neutralized a perceived risk and opened the door for Joab’s reinstatement. Cultural Significance of the Greeting “Joab said to Amasa, ‘How are you, my brother?’ ” (2 Samuel 20:9). The Hebrew expression is literally “Is it shalom with you, my brother?” Shalom conveyed fullness of well-being. Grasping the beard while kissing was an accepted sign of affection and covenant loyalty (cf. 2 Samuel 15:5). Ancient Near Eastern texts (e.g., Mari Letters, cited by evangelical archaeologist K. A. Kitchen, On the Reliability of the Old Testament, p. 263) confirm the beard-grasp as an honorable gesture—making Joab’s act the height of duplicity. Legal and Ethical Dimensions • Murder Versus Blood-Avenger Rights: Under Numbers 35:19, a near kinsman could avenge blood only when the killing was unintentional manslaughter. Amasa had killed no relative of Joab; Asahel’s death had already been “avenged” on Abner. Joab’s strike was therefore cold-blooded murder. • Deception Forbidden: “A hateful man disguises himself with his speech” (Proverbs 26:24). Joab’s violation of covenantal greeting flouted Torah ethics and ensured later divine judgment (1 Kings 2:31-34). Strategic Calculations 1. Speed: Sheba was fortifying Abel-beth-maacah; Joab judged swift, decisive leadership essential. By killing Amasa instantly he removed a bottleneck. 2. Consolidation: Troops loyal to Joab quickly rallied, while Amasa’s supporters froze in shock (2 Samuel 20:11-13). Joab resumed command without official sanction but with practical necessity. Theological Themes • Sovereignty and Human Agency: God allowed Joab’s freedom to sin, yet wove events toward David’s ultimate security and Solomon’s eventual reign, fulfilling 2 Samuel 7:12-16. • Ironic Betrayal: Joab’s “kiss” foreshadows Judas’s traitorous greeting (Luke 22:48), illustrating that false peace often masks malice. • Divine Justice Deferred: Joab evaded punishment under David but not under Solomon, showing that God’s retribution may await His timing (Ecclesiastes 8:11-13). Practical Applications • Leadership Jealousy: Modern believers must guard against ambition that undermines God’s appointed structures (James 3:14-16). • Integrity in Speech: A greeting of peace must align with intent; Christ’s followers are to let their “Yes be Yes” (Matthew 5:37). • Trusting God’s Timing: God ultimately rectifies injustices, encouraging patience amid apparent triumphs of wrongdoing (Romans 12:19). Cross-References for Study • Joab’s earlier violence: 2 Samuel 3:27; 2 Samuel 18:14. • David’s censure: 2 Samuel 19:13. • Joab’s execution: 1 Kings 2:28-34. • Judas’s kiss: Matthew 26:47-50; Luke 22:48. • Prohibition of deceit: Leviticus 19:11; Psalm 55:20-21. Conclusion Joab’s deceptive greeting sprang from a mix of personal envy, political expediency, and habitual violence. By cloaking murder in the language and gesture of peace, he violated covenant ethics, setting in motion consequences that reached into Solomon’s reign. The episode warns against duplicity, underscores God’s eventual justice, and illustrates how even grievous human sin cannot thwart the overarching purposes of the Almighty. |
    |