Why did Paul persecute Christians according to Acts 26:11? Acts 26:11 – The Text Itself “In all the synagogues I punished them often and tried to make them blaspheme; and being extremely enraged at them, I even pursued them to foreign cities.” Immediate Context in Acts 26 Paul is on trial before King Agrippa, recounting his pre-conversion life. He admits not a momentary outburst but a sustained campaign, carried out “in all the synagogues,” backed by official warrants (cf. Acts 9:1-2; 22:5). The verb he uses for “enraged” (ἐμμανής) conveys a furious obsession, explaining both the intensity and the geographical reach (“foreign cities”). Pharisaic Zeal and Covenant Loyalty Paul was “a Pharisee, the son of Pharisees” (Acts 23:6) and trained “at the feet of Gamaliel” (Acts 22:3). Pharisaic piety viewed Torah observance as covenant fidelity safeguarding national blessing (Deuteronomy 28). Any perceived breach—especially claims that a crucified man (under the curse of Deuteronomy 21:23) was Messiah and, further, divine—was viewed as blasphemy threatening Israel’s standing with Yahweh. Perceived Threat to the Temple and Sacrificial System The early church proclaimed that Jesus’ atoning death rendered further temple sacrifices typological (Acts 6:13-14; Hebrews 10:11-14). Josephus (Ant. 20.9.1) records priestly anxieties over movements endangering the sacrificial economy. As Saul, Paul saw the nascent “Way” (Acts 9:2) as subverting the very center of Jewish worship. The Charge of Blasphemy Blasphemy (βλασφημεῖν) in Jewish law demanded punishment (Leviticus 24:16). Paul’s strategy was to force Christians to renounce Jesus’ divine Messiahship, thereby validating prosecutions. This aligns with first-century halakhic procedure documented in the Mishnah (Sanh. 7:5) where verbal confession determined guilt. Corporate Solidarity and Sanhedrin Mandate Paul acted under “letters from the chief priests” (Acts 9:1-2). Second Temple jurisprudence treated heresy as communal contagion; zeal for communal purity is attested by Phinehas (Numbers 25:6-13) and Mattathias (1 Macc 2:24-27). Paul himself cites this tradition of zeal (Galatians 1:13-14; Philippians 3:5-6). Psychological and Behavioral Drivers Luke highlights Paul’s “extreme rage” (Acts 26:11). Cognitive dissonance theory suggests that the more compelling the Christian eyewitness testimony (Acts 4:20; 1 Corinthians 15:6), the greater a committed Pharisee’s internal conflict, intensifying outward aggression. As a behavioral scientist might note, persecution can serve as self-reinforcing zeal, suppressing doubt by silencing its source. Providential Preparation for Apostolic Ministry From a theological angle, Paul’s persecution sharpened his knowledge of Christian doctrine, the diaspora synagogue network, and Greco-Roman travel routes—skills God later redirected for gospel advance (Acts 9:15; Romans 15:19). His past became apologetic capital: “I was formerly a blasphemer and a persecutor…yet I received mercy” (1 Timothy 1:13). Scriptural Corroboration • Acts 8:1-3 – Saul ravages the church, dragging off believers. • Galatians 1:13 – He “violently persecuted the church of God and tried to destroy it.” • Philippians 3:6 – “As to zeal, persecuting the church.” These parallel texts confirm a singular motive: zeal for ancestral law misplaced against the Messiah’s community. Historical Credibility of Paul’s Testimony Multiple independent sources (Acts, Galatians, Philippians, 1 Timothy) converge. Early creedal material (1 Corinthians 15:3-7) predates Paul’s letters, underscoring the immediacy of the claims he once attacked. Even skeptical scholars such as Bart Ehrman concede Paul’s persecution as historical, given enemy-attestation criteria. Transformation as Evidence for the Resurrection Habermas’s “Minimal Facts” approach notes that persecutor-turned-apostle Paul lists the risen Jesus appearing to him (1 Corinthians 15:8). The best historical explanation for so radical a reversal—from hunting Christians to suffering for Christ (2 Corinthians 11:23-28)—is the objective resurrection he insists on. Naturalistic theories (vision, hallucination) fail to account for group appearances and the empty tomb attested by women witnesses (Matthew 28:1-10), the Jerusalem factor, and early proclamation. Archaeological and Manuscript Corroboration • The Erastus inscription (CIL X 1579) at Corinth and Gallio inscription (AE 1936.144) synchronize Acts chronology, affirming Luke’s historical reliability. • P 75 and 𝔓46 (c. AD 175-225) preserve Acts and Pauline epistles within a century of autographs, exhibiting textual stability. Such external data bolster trust in the narrative detailing Paul’s motives. Summary Answer Paul persecuted Christians because, as a zealous Pharisee entrusted with Sanhedrin authority, he viewed the early church’s proclamation of a crucified, divine Messiah as blasphemous and a dire threat to Torah fidelity, temple centrality, and Israel’s covenant standing. His rage was theological, communal, and personal—until the risen Jesus confronted him, redirecting that same zeal toward gospel proclamation. |
    |