Why does the psalmist claim to be for peace but face hostility? Historical and Literary Context of Psalm 120 Psalm 120 inaugurates the fifteen “Songs of Ascents” (Psalm 120–134), a liturgical collection sung by pilgrims traveling up to Jerusalem for the great festivals (cf. Deuteronomy 16:16). Composed in the post-exilic era yet echoing earlier Davidic laments, the psalm situates the speaker “in Meshech” and dwelling “among the tents of Kedar” (v. 5). Both names point to distant, hostile regions: Meshech lies far north in Asia Minor (cf. Ezekiel 27:13), while Kedar is a Bedouin confederation in Arabia (Isaiah 21:16-17). Cuneiform texts such as the Neo-Assyrian annals of Sargon II (ANET, 284) list “Mushki” and Qedarite rulers, confirming the historical reality of these peoples and the cultural pressure the faithful Israelite would have felt while sojourning among them. Theological Theme of Peace in the Psalms and Tanakh Throughout Scripture, peace is inseparable from righteousness. Psalm 34:14 commands, “Seek peace and pursue it.” Isaiah 32:17 affirms, “The work of righteousness will be peace.” Conversely, wickedness breeds conflict (Proverbs 16:28). Hence the tension of Psalm 120 arises not from personal belligerence but from the moral polarity between the speaker’s covenant loyalty and the surrounding culture’s rebellion. The Pilgrim’s Motif: Psalm 120 in the Songs of Ascents The Songs of Ascents trace an upward journey: Psalm 120 laments alienation; Psalm 121 looks to divine help; by Psalm 122 the pilgrim stands within Jerusalem’s gates. The hostility described in 120 propels the pilgrim away from exile toward the sanctuary where true peace is secured. The structure underscores that longing for shālôm naturally intensifies friction with a world at odds with God. Hostility as Covenant Reality in a Fallen World Genesis 3:15 introduces enmity between the seed of the woman and the serpent. Covenant faithfulness has always elicited opposition (cf. 1 Kings 18:17; Daniel 6:4-5). The psalmist’s experience echoes the Abrahamic sojourn (Genesis 23), Joseph in Egypt (Genesis 39), and the exiles in Babylon (Daniel 1). The New Testament confirms this pattern: “All who desire to live a godly life in Christ Jesus will be persecuted” (2 Timothy 3:12). Thus hostility is not anomalous but anticipated. Prophetic Foreshadowing of the Messiah, the Prince of Peace Isaiah 53:9 foretells of the suffering Servant “who had done no violence.” Yet He is “despised and rejected” (v. 3). Jesus embodies Psalm 120:7 in John 7:7; His testimony against the world’s evil incites hatred. At His incarnation the angelic host proclaimed “on earth peace” (Luke 2:14), yet the cross met Him. The psalm therefore typologically prefigures Christ, whose ultimate vindication in resurrection guarantees eschatological peace (Romans 5:1). Application to Believers Today Believers acting as peacemakers (Matthew 5:9) will often encounter hostility when confronting injustice or witnessing to truth. The psalm models honest lament, prayer for deliverance (vv. 1-2), and resolute identity as peace-bearers. The believer’s task is not to eliminate all conflict but to remain faithful amid it, trusting God’s ultimate vindication. Intertextual Connections: New Testament Fulfillment Romans 12:18 echoes the psalm: “If it is possible…live at peace with everyone.” Yet the chapter closes exhorting believers to overcome evil with good (v. 21), mirroring the psalmist’s stance. Ephesians 6 frames spiritual warfare as inevitable, prescribing the “gospel of peace” as footwear (v. 15). Thus the psalm’s tension is not resolved by avoidance but by gospel proclamation. Conclusion The psalmist claims to be for peace yet faces hostility because covenant faithfulness inevitably confronts a fallen world’s rebellion. His lament arises from living among deceitful, war-minded peoples (Meshech, Kedar). Linguistically, the very essence of shālôm provokes opposition from those devoted to milḥāmâ. Historically verified settings, consistent manuscript evidence, and the trajectory of redemptive history converge to show that righteous longing for peace often invites conflict—ultimately resolved in the Messiah, whose resurrection secures the final, unassailable shālôm for all who trust Him. |
    |