Topical Bible: Responsibility: Attempts to Shift: Saul

Bible > Topical > Responsibility

◄ Responsibility: Attempts to Shift: Saul ►

Topical Encyclopedia

In the biblical narrative, King Saul serves as a prominent example of an individual who attempts to shift responsibility for his actions, particularly in moments of disobedience to God's commands. Saul's reign as the first king of Israel is marked by several instances where he fails to take full responsibility for his actions, instead seeking to deflect blame onto others or justify his disobedience.

One of the most notable instances occurs in 1 Samuel 13. Saul, facing pressure from the Philistine army and seeing his own troops scattering, takes it upon himself to offer a burnt sacrifice, a duty reserved for the prophet Samuel. When Samuel arrives and questions Saul's actions, Saul attempts to justify his disobedience by blaming the circumstances and the people. He says, "When I saw that the troops were deserting me and that you did not come at the appointed time and that the Philistines were gathering at Michmash, I thought, 'Now the Philistines will descend upon me at Gilgal, and I have not sought the favor of the LORD.' So I felt compelled to offer the burnt offering" (1 Samuel 13:11-12). Here, Saul shifts responsibility by citing external pressures and his own perceived necessity, rather than acknowledging his failure to wait for Samuel.

Another significant episode is found in 1 Samuel 15, where Saul is commanded by God, through Samuel, to completely destroy the Amalekites and all they possess. However, Saul spares King Agag and the best of the livestock. When confronted by Samuel, Saul initially claims to have obeyed the command, saying, "I have carried out the LORD’s instructions" (1 Samuel 15:13). Upon further questioning, Saul shifts the blame to the people, stating, "The troops took sheep and cattle from the plunder—the best of what was devoted to destruction—to sacrifice to the LORD your God at Gilgal" (1 Samuel 15:21). Saul's attempt to shift responsibility is evident as he tries to rationalize his partial obedience by suggesting that the plunder was intended for sacrifice, thus deflecting the blame onto the people.

These episodes highlight a pattern in Saul's leadership where he fails to fully accept responsibility for his actions, often seeking to justify or excuse his disobedience. This tendency ultimately contributes to his downfall as king, as God rejects Saul's kingship due to his repeated disobedience and lack of genuine repentance. Saul's attempts to shift responsibility serve as a cautionary tale about the importance of accountability and obedience to God's commands.

Nave's Topical Index

1 Samuel 15:20,21
And Saul said to Samuel, Yes, I have obeyed the voice of the LORD, and have gone the way which the LORD sent me, and have brought Agag the king of Amalek, and have utterly destroyed the Amalekites.
Nave's Topical Index