2011. epitropé
Lexical Summary
epitropé: Permission, authority, charge

Original Word: ἐπιτροπή
Part of Speech: Noun, Feminine
Transliteration: epitropé
Pronunciation: eh-pee-tro-PAY
Phonetic Spelling: (ep-ee-trop-ay')
KJV: commission
NASB: commission
Word Origin: [from G2010 (ἐπιτρέπω - permit)]

1. permission
2. (by implication) full power

Strong's Exhaustive Concordance
commission.

From epitrepo; permission, i.e. (by implication) full power -- commission.

see GREEK epitrepo

NAS Exhaustive Concordance
Word Origin
from epitrepó
Definition
authority
NASB Translation
commission (1).

Thayer's Greek Lexicon
STRONGS NT 2011: ἐπιτροπή

ἐπιτροπή, ἐπιτροπῆς, (ἐπιτρέπω), permission, power, commission: Acts 26:12. (From Thucydides down.)

Topical Lexicon
Topical Overview

Strong’s Greek 2011 appears only in Acts 26:12 yet opens a rich window into the biblical theme of delegated authority or a “commission.” In Luke’s narrative, Saul of Tarsus carries official authorization from the Jerusalem hierarchy to suppress followers of Jesus. Scripture then juxtaposes that human endorsement with the greater, divine mandate Saul receives on the Damascus road (Acts 26:14-18). The term therefore serves as a pivot: from earthly permission aimed at destruction to heavenly commissioning aimed at salvation.

First-Century Background

The Sanhedrin, functioning under Roman oversight, could issue letters of authorization for matters it judged religiously vital (Acts 9:1-2). Such written warrants enabled emissaries like Saul to mobilize local synagogues and regional authorities. This legal structure mirrors wider Greco-Roman practice, where provincial governors routinely dispatched deputies with sealed documents (compare Nehemiah 2:7-8 for an earlier Persian parallel). Luke’s use of the word in Acts 26:12 resonates with readers attuned to the gravity of bearing another’s official power.

Saul’s Human Mandate and God’s Overruling Call

Acts 26:12: “In this pursuit, I was on my way to Damascus with the authority and commission of the chief priests.”

What follows is not merely a change of mind but a transfer of allegiance. Saul’s earthly mission is halted by the risen Christ, who issues His own command in Acts 26:16-18. The contrast underscores two key truths:

1. Human authorization, however prestigious, remains subordinate to divine prerogative (Proverbs 21:30).
2. God can redirect even hostile intentions for redemptive ends (Genesis 50:20; Galatians 1:15-16).

Patterns of Commissioning in Scripture

1. Old Testament prototypes: Moses lays hands on Joshua as successor (Numbers 27:18-19). Isaiah volunteers after a vision of the throne (Isaiah 6:8). These scenes blend personal readiness with divine endorsement.
2. Jesus and the Twelve: Luke 9:1 records that He “gave them power and authority over all demons and to heal diseases.” The Great Commission climaxes this pattern—“All authority in heaven and on earth has been given to Me” (Matthew 28:18).
3. Apostolic ministry: Paul’s letters repeatedly anchor his authority in Christ, not in human councils (Galatians 1:1; 1 Corinthians 1:1). The Damascus encounter, linked by ἐπιτροπή, supplies the historical basis for that claim.

Theological Significance

• Delegated authority is legitimate only when aligned with God’s revealed will. Scripture neither romanticizes human institutions nor dismisses them; it subjects them to higher judgment (Acts 4:19).
• Conversion involves not merely forgiveness but reassignment. Paul moves from persecutor to “a chosen instrument” (Acts 9:15). The Lord’s commission defines identity and vocation.
• The term in Acts 26:12 cautions against confusing ecclesiastical endorsement with divine approval. Authority is measured by fidelity to the gospel.

Implications for Contemporary Ministry

• Calling and credentials: Seminaries, ordination councils, and church boards rightly confer recognition, yet leaders must continually test their direction against Scripture and the Spirit’s leading (2 Timothy 2:15).
• Misused authority: Saul’s pre-conversion zeal warns of doctrinal clarity divorced from love (1 Timothy 1:13-14).
• Evangelistic confidence: If Christ commissions, opposition cannot invalidate the mission (Matthew 28:19-20; Acts 18:9-10).
• Accountability: Elders shepherd “not lording it over those entrusted” (1 Peter 5:3), remembering that authority is stewardship, not ownership.

Key Cross-References

Acts 9:1-2; Acts 26:14-18

Matthew 28:18-20

Numbers 27:18-19

Isaiah 6:8

Galatians 1:1, 13-16

1 Peter 5:1-3

Summary

Strong’s 2011 highlights one instance where human authorization collides with divine commission. Its placement in Acts 26 invites readers to examine every exercise of power in light of Christ’s supreme authority and the redemptive purposes of God.

Forms and Transliterations
επιτροπης επιτροπής ἐπιτροπῆς epitropes epitropês epitropēs epitropē̂s
Links
Interlinear GreekInterlinear HebrewStrong's NumbersEnglishman's Greek ConcordanceEnglishman's Hebrew ConcordanceParallel Texts
Englishman's Concordance
Acts 26:12 N-GFS
GRK: ἐξουσίας καὶ ἐπιτροπῆς τῆς τῶν
NAS: with the authority and commission of the chief priests,
KJV: and commission from
INT: authority and a commission of the

Strong's Greek 2011
1 Occurrence


ἐπιτροπῆς — 1 Occ.

2010
Top of Page
Top of Page