Lexical Summary epoptés: Eyewitness, Overseer Original Word: ἐπόπτης Strong's Exhaustive Concordance eyewitness. From epi and a presumed derivative of optanomai; a looker-on -- eye-witness. see GREEK epi see GREEK optanomai NAS Exhaustive Concordance Word Originfrom epi and the fut. of horaó Definition a looker-on, i.e. a spectator NASB Translation eyewitnesses (1). Thayer's Greek Lexicon STRONGS NT 2030: ἐπόπτηςἐπόπτης, ἐπόπτου, ὁ (from unused ἐπόπτω); 1. an overseer, inspector, see ἐπίσκοπος; (Aeschylus, Pindar, others; of God, in 2 Macc. 3:39 2Macc. 7:35; 3Macc. 2:21; Additions to Esther 5:1; ἀνθρωπίνων ἔργων, Clement of Rome, 1 Cor. 59, 3 [ET]). 2. a spectator, eye-witness of anything: so in 2 Peter 1:16; inasmuch as those were called ἐπόπται by the Greeks who had attained to the third (i. e. the highest) grade of the Eleusinian mysteries (Plutarch, Alcib. 22, and elsewhere), the word seems to be used here to designate those privileged to be present at the heavenly spectacle of the transfiguration of Christ. The single New Testament occurrence of Strong’s Greek 2030 (2 Peter 1:16) anchors a rich biblical theme: God establishes truth through firsthand, verifiable witness. Peter says, “we were eyewitnesses of His majesty” (2 Peter 1:16), pointing directly to the Transfiguration and implicitly to the resurrection appearances (2 Peter 1:17-18). The apostle appeals not to philosophy or myth but to personal observation of Christ’s glory, providing a model for apostolic proclamation. Apostolic Authority and Reliability By identifying himself as an eyewitness, Peter ties his teaching to the legal-historical standard laid down in Deuteronomy 19:15, “On the testimony of two or three witnesses a matter must be established.” Luke follows the same principle (Luke 1:2), and Paul appeals to more than five hundred resurrection witnesses (1 Corinthians 15:6). Scripture consistently roots doctrine in concrete events confirmed by those who saw and heard. This safeguards the church from “cleverly devised myths” (2 Peter 1:16) and grounds faith in verifiable history. Historical Context: The Transfiguration as Proof Peter’s choice of the eyewitness term in 2 Peter 1:16 occurs after decades of ministry during which false teachers were questioning the return of Christ (2 Peter 3:3-4). By recalling the Transfiguration—when the kingdom broke into present time—Peter supplies irrefutable evidence that the Son’s future appearing is certain. The direct vision of Christ’s divine splendor on the holy mountain functions as a pledge of His glorious Parousia. Continuity with Old Testament Witness Old Covenant prophets also served as watchmen who saw and declared God’s acts (Isaiah 30:20-21; Ezekiel 3:17). Peter’s eyewitness claim positions the apostles as the New Covenant counterparts who, having seen the Messiah’s majesty, interpret His revelation “more fully confirmed” (2 Peter 1:19). Thus Scripture presents a seamless line of God-appointed observers whose testimony builds an unbroken, trustworthy canon. Ministry Implications 1. Preaching: Pastors proclaim not abstract ideals but historical gospel facts witnessed in space and time (Acts 10:39-41). Early Church Reception Second-century apologists like Papias and Irenaeus echoed Peter’s emphasis, valuing proximity to eyewitnesses when judging authentic teaching. This early insistence explains the rapid circulation and preservation of apostolic writings and the church’s discernment against spurious gospels. Call to Contemporary Witness While the apostolic office was unique, every believer testifies to Christ’s reality by the Spirit’s inner witness (Romans 8:16) and by living out observable holiness (Matthew 5:16). Thus the pattern of 2 Peter 1:16 continues: God’s truth is displayed through men and women who have encountered the risen Lord and declare His majesty until He comes. |
    |