Lexical Summary alogos: Irrational, unreasonable, without reason Original Word: ἄλογος Strong's Exhaustive Concordance brute, unreasonable. From a (as a negative particle) and logos; irrational -- brute, unreasonable. see GREEK a see GREEK logos HELPS Word-studies 249 álogos (from 1 /A "not" and 3056 /lógos, "reason") – properly, counter to reason; "unreasonable" – literally, "non-reason, no-logic." 249 /álogos ("unreasonable") refers to irrational behavior (thinking) from God's point of view, i.e. what is completely against divine reason. 249 (álogos) means "acting like a brute beast" (see Jude 10), i.e. utterly unreasonable (absurd). [249 (álogos) describes behavior that lacks sound moral (spiritual) reasoning.] NAS Exhaustive Concordance Word Originfrom alpha (as a neg. prefix) and logos Definition without reason NASB Translation absurd (1), unreasoning (2). Thayer's Greek Lexicon STRONGS NT 249: ἄλογοςἄλογος, (λόγος, reason); 1. destitute of reason, brute: ζῷα, brute animals, Jude 1:10; 2 Peter 2:12 (Wis. 11:16; Xenophon, Hier. 7, 3, others). 2. contrary to reason, absurd: Acts 25:27 (Xenophon, Ages. 11, 1; Thucydides 6, 85; often in Plato, Isocrates, others). Strong’s Greek 249, ἄλογος, surfaces three times in the New Testament. Each setting underscores a condition, action, or decision devoid of reasoned reflection—whether moral, spiritual, or judicial—and thus highlights the peril of living, speaking, or judging apart from God-given discernment. Occurrences and Contexts 1. Acts 25:27 – Governor Festus, preparing to send Paul to Caesar, admits: “For it seems unreasonable to me to send on a prisoner without specifying the charges against him”. Here ἄλογος exposes the folly of legal procedure detached from evidence, reminding readers that justice demands clarity and truth. Theological Significance ἄλογος does more than label stupidity; it unmasks a heart estranged from divine wisdom. Scripture consistently joins right thinking with right living (Romans 12:2; Philippians 4:8). Thus ἄλογος behavior reveals suppression of truth (Romans 1:18-22). In Peter and Jude, the term exposes the ultimate trajectory of such suppression—perdition—while Acts shows the absurdity that even pagan governance recognizes when reason is bypassed. Moral and Ethical Dimensions • ἄλογος contrasts sharply with the renewed mind of the believer (Ephesians 4:23). Pastoral and Homiletical Application • Warn against teaching or absorbing doctrine untethered to Scripture. The brute-beast imagery dramatizes the outcome. Historical Interpretation Early fathers (e.g., Clement of Alexandria, Athanasius) read 2 Peter and Jude as polemics against Gnostic irrationality. Reformation commentators applied ἄλογος to ecclesial abuses, showing that tradition without Scriptural warrant drifts into unreason. Contemporary expositors link the term to post-modern relativism, where feeling eclipses fact. Related Concepts • φρόνησις (prudence) – the antidote of Spirit-guided reason. Ministry Significance Church leadership must guard against ἄλογος governance—policy made without biblical anchoring or congregational transparency. Apologetics ministries highlight the rational coherence of faith, demonstrating that Christianity invites thoughtful engagement, not credulous impulse. In missions and evangelism, presenting the gospel as both transformative and intellectually satisfying counters caricatures of faith as ἄλογος superstition. Englishman's Concordance Acts 25:27 Adj-NNSGRK: ἄλογον γάρ μοι NAS: For it seems absurd to me in sending KJV: to me unreasonable to send INT: absurd indeed to me 2 Peter 2:12 Adj-NNP Jude 1:10 Adj-NNP Strong's Greek 249 |