7170. qerats
Lexical Summary
qerats: To nip, pinch, or bite

Original Word: קְרַץ
Part of Speech: Noun Masculine
Transliteration: qrats
Pronunciation: keh-rats
Phonetic Spelling: (ker-ats')
NASB: charges
Word Origin: [(Aramaic) corresponding to H7171 (קֶרֶץ - horsefly) in the sense of a bit (to "eat the morsels of" any one, i.e. chew him up (figuratively) by slander)]

1. + accuse

Strong's Exhaustive Concordance
accuse

(Aramaic) corresponding to qerets in the sense of a bit (to "eat the morsels of" any one, i.e. Chew him up (figuratively) by slander) -- + accuse.

see HEBREW qerets

NAS Exhaustive Concordance
Word Origin
(Aramaic) corresponding to qerets
Definition
a piece
NASB Translation
charges (1), maliciously accused* (1).

Brown-Driver-Briggs
[קְרַץ] noun [masculine] piece (ᵑ7; see Biblical Hebrew קרץ); — plural suffix קַרְצ֫וֺהִי Daniel 6:25, צֵיהוֺן- Daniel 3:8, both in phrase ׳אֲכַ֫לוּ ק, i.e. accuse maliciously (so ᵑ7 Syriac PS3756 (compare Old Aramaic ׳אמר כרצי פ Lzb299 SAC66 Cooke205f.; כרץ also Mandean), probably borrowed from Assyrian karƒe akâlu, malign, slander (often; also Tel Amarna); compare also u‡tarrizu HammLaw 161; further Arabic id., and kindred phrase; Ethiopic Di489).

Topical Lexicon
Summary of Usage

Strong’s Hebrew 7170 appears only twice, both in the Aramaic chapters of Daniel, where it describes malicious or hostile accusation leveled against God’s faithful servants. In each narrative the malicious act is contrasted with divine vindication, reinforcing the biblical pattern that false witnesses will be exposed while the righteous are rescued.

Context in Daniel 3:8

“At this time some Chaldeans came forward and maliciously accused the Jews.” (Daniel 3:8)

The accusation follows Nebuchadnezzar’s decree to worship the golden image. Shadrach, Meshach and Abednego refuse, prompting jealous officials to charge them with disloyalty. The verb underscores a calculated slander, not a neutral report. The hostility is intensified by ethnic resentment (“the Jews”) and by the court politics of Babylon. God’s immediate deliverance from the furnace demonstrates that no accusation can thwart His covenant faithfulness.

Context in Daniel 6:24

“Then the king gave the command, and those men who had maliciously accused Daniel were brought and thrown into the den of lions…” (Daniel 6:24)

Here the plotters exploit Persian law to trap Daniel, knowing his unwavering prayer life. Their scheme, clothed in civic duty, is unmasked as malice when God shuts the lions’ mouths and the accusers receive their own penalty. The narrative explicitly ties their fate to their accusation, stressing divine retributive justice.

Historical Background

Both scenes arise in foreign imperial courts—first Babylonian, then Medo-Persian—during the exile. In such contexts Jews held high office yet remained cultural outsiders, inviting envy. Court life was volatile; accusations could be fatal. The verb thus evokes a setting where slander functioned as a political weapon. Daniel’s book records these events to encourage exiles that God remains sovereign despite hostile powers.

Theological Implications

1. Divine Sovereignty: False charges do not escape God’s notice; He orchestrates outcomes for His glory.
2. Covenant Fidelity: The accused stand firm out of loyalty to the LORD rather than to cultural expectations.
3. Retribution: Both narratives climax with the accusers receiving the punishment they intended for the righteous, illustrating Proverbs 26:27.
4. Witness to the Nations: Nebuchadnezzar and Darius ultimately honor God, showing that faithful endurance under accusation can lead to evangelistic impact.

Related Biblical Themes

• False Witness (Exodus 20:16; Proverbs 6:19)
• Slander against the righteous (Psalm 31:18; 1 Peter 3:16)
• Vindication by God (Isaiah 54:17; Romans 8:33)
• Reversal of plots (Esther 7:10; Psalm 57:6)

Christological Foreshadowing

Jesus Christ was likewise betrayed by malicious accusers (Mark 14:55-59). The innocent Son underwent wrongful judgment yet was vindicated in resurrection, fulfilling the pattern prefigured in Daniel. Both accounts in Daniel anticipate the ultimate triumph of the Righteous One over slander and death.

Practical and Ministry Applications

• Expectation: Believers who refuse idolatry or compromise may face false charges.
• Integrity: Daniel and his friends exemplify blameless conduct that leaves accusations without substance (Daniel 6:4).
• Prayer and Dependence: Daniel’s faithfulness in prayer sustains him through the crisis.
• Courageous Public Faith: The three Hebrews serve God openly, not merely in private conviction.
• Hope: The narratives assure modern disciples that God can deliver, whether by rescue (Daniel 3:17) or resurrection (Daniel 3:18; Hebrews 11:35).

Conclusion

Strong’s Hebrew 7170 highlights a recurring biblical tension: the world’s hostility toward those loyal to God. In Daniel, malicious accusations become catalysts for divine intervention and testimony. The faithful are preserved, the slanderers are judged, and the glory of God is magnified before kings and peoples—a timeless encouragement to stand firm amid any unjust charge.

Forms and Transliterations
קַרְצ֙וֹהִי֙ קַרְצֵיה֖וֹן קרצוהי קרציהון kartzeiHon karTzohi qar·ṣê·hō·wn qar·ṣō·w·hî qarṣêhōwn qarṣōwhî
Links
Interlinear GreekInterlinear HebrewStrong's NumbersEnglishman's Greek ConcordanceEnglishman's Hebrew ConcordanceParallel Texts
Englishman's Concordance
Daniel 3:8
HEB: כַּשְׂדָּאִ֑ין וַאֲכַ֥לוּ קַרְצֵיה֖וֹן דִּ֥י יְהוּדָיֵֽא׃
NAS: and brought charges against
INT: Chaldeans and brought charges against the Jews

Daniel 6:24
HEB: דִּֽי־ אֲכַ֤לוּ קַרְצ֙וֹהִי֙ דִּ֣י דָֽנִיֵּ֔אל
INT: who accuse accuse who Daniel

2 Occurrences

Strong's Hebrew 7170
2 Occurrences


qar·ṣê·hō·wn — 1 Occ.
qar·ṣō·w·hî — 1 Occ.

7169
Top of Page
Top of Page