How does Acts 9:6 challenge our understanding of conversion experiences? Text of Acts 9:6 “Now get up and go into the city, and you will be told what you must do.” Literary Setting and Narrative Flow Acts 9:1-19 records Saul’s journey from militant persecutor to commissioned apostle. Luke places the moment of verse 6 after a blinding theophany, the spoken self-identification of the risen Jesus, and the collapse of Saul’s self-assurance. Verse 6 occupies the hinge of the story: it is the first command Saul receives after recognizing Jesus as Lord. Historical Plausibility 1. Luke names Governor Aretas (Acts 9:24; 2 Corinthians 11:32), dated by external inscriptions and papyri to A.D. 37-39, placing the conversion within a narrow, checkable window. 2. Archaeological work at the “Straight Street” (Via Recta) in Damascus confirms a first-century urban artery matching Luke’s detail (Acts 9:11). 3. Contemporary rabbinic sources (b. Sanhedrin 32b) describe extradition authority wielded by the Sanhedrin over Diaspora synagogues, corroborating Saul’s letters of arrest (Acts 9:2). Divine Initiative: Conversion Begins with God, Not Man Saul neither sought Christ nor entertained doubt. The theophany interrupts the trajectory of his will, challenging any view that depicts conversion as primarily a human quest for meaning. Jesus acts first (John 15:16). This aligns with Isaiah 65:1, “I was found by those who did not seek Me,” and underscores prevenient grace. Revelation Precedes Instruction Before Saul receives moral directives, he receives a revelatory fact: Jesus lives. The gospel’s foundation is the historical resurrection, not ethical reform. Habermas’s “minimal-facts” approach shows that virtually every critical scholar concedes Paul believed he saw the risen Lord (1 Corinthians 15:8). Acts 9:6 reflects that same bedrock event. Immediate Obedience vs. Gradual Process Modern testimonials often value extended reflection and incremental change. Verse 6 presents instantaneous lordship: Saul rises while blind, led by others, fasting three days—the physical posture of surrender. The behaviorist notes an abrupt replacement of reinforcing contingencies: persecutory status and social capital lose value; relationship to Christ gains ultimate reward (Philippians 3:7-8). Silence, Blindness, and Humility The suspended sensory input (blindness) dislodges Saul’s reliance on empirical mastery—the perfect foil for later arguments (2 Corinthians 5:7). In psychological terms, the event induces a liminal state wherein core beliefs are malleable. God utilizes that window to reconstruct identity (Galatians 2:20). Community Mediation Although Jesus speaks directly, full interpretation comes through Ananias and the laying on of hands (Acts 9:17-18). Conversion is personal yet ecclesial. It rebukes the “just-me-and-God” mentality and anticipates baptismal incorporation (Acts 9:18; cf. 1 Corinthians 12:13). Miracle and Message Unified The same voice that commands is the voice that resurrected. The intelligent design paradigm observes that information is never free-floating; it is embedded by an intelligent agent. Similarly, redemptive information is delivered by the Designer Himself, validating miracle and message in one act. Transformation as Empirical Evidence Luke records post-conversion behaviors: preaching Christ in synagogues, facing plots, accepting persecution (Acts 9:20-25). Behavioral change becomes publicly falsifiable evidence. Josephus notes that early Christian claims “did not cease” even under threat (Ant. 20.200), a sociological corroboration of Luke’s portrait. Implications for Soteriology 1. Monergistic Grace: God’s unilateral act brings Saul from death to life (Ephesians 2:4-5). 2. Faith and Works: Obedience (“go”) follows revelation, echoing Romans 1:5’s “obedience of faith.” 3. Lordship Salvation: The earliest Christian confession is “Jesus is Lord” (Romans 10:9); Acts 9:6 operationalizes it before any doctrinal class or altar call. Challenges to Contemporary Conceptions • Emotional vs. Volitional: Modern narratives prize feelings. Acts 9:6 emphasizes command and compliance. • Self-Discovery vs. Self-Denial: Culture urges authenticity; Saul is told, not consulted. • Incrementalism vs. Punctiliarity: Though sanctification unfolds, the saving transaction is decisive (John 5:24). Guidance for Evangelism The verse legitimizes direct proclamation that confronts and commands. Ray Comfort-style questions (“Have you lied, stolen…?”) mirror Jesus’ straight imperatives. Yet, just as Ananias offered gentle words (“Brother Saul”), bold truth should partner with pastoral care. Consistency with the Broader Canon • Theophany and Commission: Compare Moses (Exodus 3:10), Isaiah (Isaiah 6:8-9). Encounter leads to mission. • Divine Sovereignty and Human Responsibility: Saul must “get up,” echoing Philippians 2:12-13. • Apostolic Pattern: Later, Peter tells Cornelius, “Get up… I myself am a man” (Acts 10:26), but only after the angelic, God-initiated vision. Conclusion Acts 9:6 dismantles any concept of conversion as mere self-help, gradual moral improvement, or purely emotional experience. It anchors salvation in the objective reality of the risen Christ, asserts God’s sovereign initiative, demands immediate obedience, and situates the convert within the community of faith. Modern readers, therefore, must calibrate their expectations to Scripture’s pattern: revelation first, submission second, transformation lasting. |
    |