How does Hebrews 10:9 relate to the fulfillment of Old Testament law? Text of Hebrews 10:9 “Then He said, ‘Behold, I have come to do Your will.’ He takes away the first to establish the second.” Immediate Literary Context Hebrews 10:1-18 is the crescendo of a sustained argument that began in 7:1. The inspired writer contrasts the repetitive, earthly sacrifices commanded in the Mosaic Law with the once-for-all, heavenly sacrifice of Christ. Verses 5-7 quote Psalm 40:6-8, applied to the incarnate Son. Verse 9 interprets that citation: by coming to do the Father’s will, Christ “takes away the first [covenantal order of animal sacrifice] to establish the second [His perfect, final offering].” Old Testament Sacrificial System: Purpose and Limitations 1. Divine Pedagogue—Galatians 3:24 calls the Law a “tutor” leading to Christ. 2. Temporary Covering—Leviticus repeatedly stresses that blood “makes atonement” (Leviticus 17:11), yet Hebrews 10:4 declares “it is impossible for the blood of bulls and goats to take away sins.” 3. Shadows, Not Substance—Colossians 2:17; Hebrews 8:5 use the language of “shadow” and “copy.” These typological structures prepared Israel (and the nations watching, cf. 1 Kings 8:41-43) for a better covenant. Covenantal Shift Explained • Mosaic Covenant (Exodus 19-24): law engraved on stone, centered on the tabernacle and later Temple. • New Covenant (Jeremiah 31:31-34; inaugurated Luke 22:20): law written on hearts, centered on Christ, the true Temple (John 2:19-21). Hebrews 10:9 marks the legal hand-off. The moral character of God reflected in the Law remains (Romans 7:12), but its sacrificial and ceremonial components have reached their telos (Romans 10:4, τέλος = goal/fulfillment). Christ the Antitype of Every Mosaic Shadow • Passover Lamb—Ex 12 ↔ 1 Corinthians 5:7. • Day of Atonement Scapegoat—Lev 16 ↔ Hebrews 13:12. • High-Priestly Intercession—Ex 28 ↔ Hebrews 7:25. Thus Hebrews 10:9 affirms that what was provisional has met its divinely appointed counterpart in the incarnate Son. Archaeological and Historical Corroboration • Ketef Hinnom silver scrolls (7th century BCE) preserve language of priestly blessing (Numbers 6), attesting to Mosaic liturgical continuity. • The Temple Mount Sifting Project yields priestly trumpet inscriptions (1st century CE), reminding us how central sacrifice was until AD 70. The abrupt cessation of Temple sacrifice after Rome’s destruction underscores Hebrews’ claim that Christ’s offering permanently replaced the old system. The Resurrection as Divine Vindication of Covenant Replacement Romans 1:4—Christ is “declared to be the Son of God with power by His resurrection.” If He remained in the grave, Temple ritual would remain necessary. The empty tomb (multiple attestation: women witnesses in all four Gospels; enemy acknowledgement in Matthew 28:11-15; early creed in 1 Corinthians 15:3-7) verifies that the substitutionary death was accepted, sealing the new covenant and rendering further animal offerings obsolete. Objections Answered 1. “Didn’t Jesus say the Law is eternal?” (Matthew 5:17-18) He fulfilled (πληρόω) it—completing its demands—so that none of it passes away “until all is accomplished.” Hebrews 10:9 states that accomplishment. 2. “Does this promote antinomianism?” No. Hebrews 10:16 quotes Jeremiah 31:33: “I will put My laws in their hearts.” The moral law is internalized, not discarded. 3. “Isn’t Hebrews a later, anonymous text?” Early citation by Clement of Rome (AD 95) places the epistle within the apostolic generation, and its high-Christology aligns with pre-Pauline hymns (Philippians 2:5-11). Practical Implications • Worship centers on Christ’s once-for-all sacrifice (Hebrews 10:19-22), not repeated rites. • Believers rest from self-justifying works (10:14), yet are spurred to good works (10:24). • Evangelism points to completed redemption: “By one sacrifice He has made perfect forever those who are being sanctified” (10:14). Summary Hebrews 10:9 declares that Christ’s obedient incarnation nullified the provisional sacrificial order and inaugurated the definitive new covenant. The verse stands on solid textual, historical, and theological ground, inviting every reader to abandon dead works and trust the risen Savior whose once-for-all offering fulfills the Law’s every shadow. |
    |