Why does Paul defend himself before King Agrippa in Acts 26:1? I. Text of Acts 26:1 “Then Agrippa said to Paul, ‘You are permitted to speak for yourself.’ So Paul motioned with his hand and began his defense.” II. Immediate Literary Context Paul has been confined two years in Caesarea (Acts 24:27) and has already defended himself before Felix (Acts 24), Festus (Acts 25), and the Sanhedrin (Acts 23). Festus, uncertain of the Jewish theological dispute regarding the resurrection, seeks the advice of King Agrippa II (Acts 25:26). Agrippa’s arrival creates a formal hearing where Paul may both clarify the charges and proclaim the gospel. III. Historical–Legal Setting 1. Roman Procedure: As a Roman citizen (Acts 22:25–28), Paul possessed the ius defendendi—the right to answer accusers publicly before judgment. 2. Agrippa’s Jurisdiction: Though Paul had appealed to Caesar (Acts 25:11), Agrippa, a Herodian expert in Jewish religion appointed by Rome to oversee the temple treasury and high-priestly vestments, could supply Festus with a precise report (Acts 25:26–27). 3. Jewish Charges: The Sanhedrin alleged that Paul violated temple sanctity (Acts 21:28) and taught doctrines contrary to Moses (Acts 24:5–6). Roman governors cared little for intra-Jewish theology; hence Paul must show both his political innocence and the theological integrity of his message. IV. Scriptural Mandate for Testifying before Kings 1. Prophetic Word to Paul: “This man is My chosen instrument to carry My name before the Gentiles and their kings” (Acts 9:15). 2. Christ’s Promise in Jerusalem: “Take courage! As you have testified about Me in Jerusalem, so also you must testify in Rome” (Acts 23:11). Standing before Agrippa fulfills both prophecies, demonstrating divine orchestration. V. Pauline Objectives in the Defense 1. Legal Vindication • Dispel political sedition charges by recounting his strict Pharisaic upbringing (Acts 26:4–5) and peaceful ministry. 2. Doctrinal Clarification • Center the dispute on “the hope of the promise God made to our fathers” (Acts 26:6)—i.e., resurrection. 3. Evangelistic Opportunity • Present the gospel to Agrippa, Bernice, Festus, military tribunes, and local dignitaries (Acts 25:23). 4. Personal Obedience • Obey Christ’s commission received on the Damascus road (Acts 26:16–18). VI. Rhetorical Structure of the Defense 1. Captatio Benevolentiae (winning goodwill): Respectful address—“I consider myself fortunate, King Agrippa” (Acts 26:2). 2. Narratio: Personal history, conversion, and commission (Acts 26:4–18). 3. Probatio: Scriptural and prophetic grounding; resurrection of Messiah validated by eyewitness experience (Acts 26:22–23). 4. Refutatio: Answers accusations, states sanity (Acts 26:24–25), appeals to Agrippa’s knowledge of prophets (Acts 26:26–27). 5. Peroratio: Implicit altar call—“I pray to God that whether in a short or long time, not only you but all who hear me today might become as I am, except for these chains” (Acts 26:29). VII. Theological Significance 1. Centrality of Resurrection: Paul frames the trial around the veracity of Jesus’ bodily resurrection, laying historical evidence before a ruling monarch. 2. Sovereignty of God: Divine purpose turns a Roman hearing into a gospel platform (cf. Philippians 1:12–13). 3. Apologetic Model: Demonstrates respectful engagement, use of personal testimony, and appeal to fulfilled prophecy—principles echoed in 1 Peter 3:15. VIII. Manuscript and Historical Corroboration Codices Sinaiticus and Vaticanus transmit Acts 26 without textual variants affecting meaning; Papyrus 50 (3rd c.) likewise affirms wording. Josephus’ Antiquities 20.7.3 confirms Agrippa II and Bernice’s presence in Caesarea during Festus’ term, aligning secular history with Luke’s record. IX. Behavioral and Philosophical Observations Paul leverages narrative persuasion—storytelling elicits empathy and reduces defensive bias. Contemporary behavioral research affirms that autobiographical testimony increases credibility and openness in hostile audiences, a technique Paul intuitively employs under Spirit guidance. X. Practical Implications for Believers 1. Use legal rights and cultural platforms for gospel proclamation. 2. Frame opposition as a question of truth, not merely personal grievance. 3. Maintain respect toward authorities while uncompromisingly presenting Christ. XI. Summary Paul defends himself before King Agrippa to exercise his legal right, clarify false charges, fulfill prophetic calling, and, above all, to bear witness to the risen Christ, turning a courtroom into a mission field. |
    |