Lexical Summary katanathematizó: To curse vehemently, to anathematize Original Word: καταναθεματίζω Strong's Exhaustive Concordance curse. From kata (intensive) and anathematizo; to imprecate -- curse. see GREEK kata see GREEK anathematizo HELPS Word-studies 2653 katanathematízō(from 2596 /katá, "down, according to," intensifying 332 /anathematízō) – "curse vehemently" (A-S). 2653 (katanathematízō) is stronger (more dramatic) than 332 /anathematízō ("to curse"). Note the force of the added prefix (kata; see Zodhiates, Dict). NAS Exhaustive Concordance Word Originvariant reading for katathematizó, q.v. Thayer's Greek Lexicon STRONGS NT 2653: καταθεματίζωκαταθεματίζω; (κατάθεμα, which see); to call down direst evils on, to curse vehemently: Matthew 26:74 (Rec. καταναθεματίζειν). (Irenaeus adv. haer. 1, 13, 4 and 16, 3.) STRONGS NT 2653: καταναθεματίζωκαταναθεματίζω; (κατανάθεμα, which see); equivalent to καταθεματίζω (q v.) Matthew 26:74 Rec. (Justin Martyr, dialog contra Trypho, c. 47, and other ecclesiastical writings.) The verb under consideration expresses the action of calling down a curse upon oneself or upon another in order to underline the truthfulness of a statement. It intensifies a denial or affirmation by appealing to divine judgment should the speaker be lying. The idea is stronger than ordinary swearing; it weaponizes the sacred for self-protection. Unique New Testament Occurrence Matthew 26:74 records its single appearance: “At that he began to curse and to swear, ‘I do not know the Man!’ And immediately a rooster crowed.” (Berean Standard Bible) Here Simon Peter, under intense social and spiritual pressure, reinforces his third denial of Jesus with both oaths and self-imprecation. The moment accentuates the depth of human weakness immediately before Christ’s atoning passion. Narrative Setting and Purpose in Matthew 1. Dramatic Climax: Matthew’s Gospel builds Peter’s failure toward this verbal crescendo. Earlier warnings—“You will all fall away on account of Me” (Matthew 26:31)—give way to fulfillment. Old Testament Background on Curses and Oaths • Legal Procedure: Numbers 5:21 illustrates a self-imprecatory oath in the ritual for suspected adultery. These passages frame the seriousness of invoking God’s name as guarantee, a seriousness Peter momentarily ignores. Theological Significance 1. Human Depravity: Even a devoted disciple collapses under pressure, proving the universal need for grace (Romans 3:10-18). Historical Reception • Early Church Fathers (e.g., Chrysostom) viewed Peter’s oath as proof of Scripture’s honesty in portraying leaders’ faults and as a warning against pride. Practical and Pastoral Applications 1. Guarded Tongues: Believers must cultivate truthful, straightforward speech, resisting the urge to invoke God’s judgment casually or deceitfully. Related New Testament Concepts • “Swear” (Matthew 5:34; James 5:12) – general oath-making. Summary Though it appears only once, this verb exposes the peril of leveraging sacred curses to shield oneself, and it magnifies the grace that rescues and recommissions the fallen. The episode admonishes the church to revere God’s name, speak with integrity, and depend wholly on the atoning work of Christ. Englishman's Concordance Matthew 26:74 V-PNAGRK: τότε ἤρξατο καταθεματίζειν καὶ ὀμνύειν KJV: Then began he to curse and to swear, INT: Then he began to curse and to swear |