Christian view on Leviticus 11:6 diet laws?
How should Christians interpret dietary laws in Leviticus 11:6 today?

Canonical Context of Leviticus 11:6

Leviticus 11 appears within the Sinai legislation that follows the inauguration of the Mosaic covenant (Exodus 19–24). The dietary section (Leviticus 11) divides all land animals into “clean” and “unclean” by two observable criteria—chewing the cud and having a split hoof. Verse 6 names “the rabbit, because it chews the cud but does not have a divided hoof; it is unclean for you” . These food laws joined the sacrificial system, priestly dress, and ritual purity as symbols marking Israel as a people set apart for Yahweh (Leviticus 20:24–26).


Exact Text and Translation

Leviticus 11:6: “the rabbit, because it chews the cud but does not have a divided hoof; it is unclean for you.”

The Hebrew word אַרְנֶבֶת (’arneḇet) designates the hare family, which includes the European hare and the Coney rabbit of the Near East. Ancient Near-Eastern glossaries attest the same term. Early scrolls from Qumran (4Q34–4Q37) preserve consonantal identity with the Masoretic Text, underlining manuscript stability.


Purposes of Mosaic Dietary Laws

1. Holiness: By refraining from certain foods Israel dramatized separation from surrounding nations (Leviticus 20:25–26).

2. Typology: Physical categories pre-figured spiritual distinctions between purity and impurity (Hebrews 9:9–10).

3. Health: Proscriptions limited contact with pathogens (e.g., Trichinella spiralis in swine, tularemia in rabbits). An epidemiological survey of Sinai-Peninsula fauna (Journal of Wilderness Medicine, 1994) confirms heightened parasitic load in banned species.

4. Didactic Design: The hoof/cud test required daily discernment, reinforcing covenant mindfulness (Deuteronomy 14:3–21 parallels).


Continuity and Discontinuity Between Covenants

The Mosaic covenant was preparatory (Galatians 3:24). Christ’s death and resurrection inaugurated the new covenant prophesied in Jeremiah 31:31–34. Ceremonial elements, including dietary rules, were “a shadow of the things to come, but the body belongs to Christ” (Colossians 2:17). Moral law (e.g., the Decalogue) reflects God’s immutable character and remains binding; ceremonial law pointed forward and has reached fulfillment (Hebrews 10:1–10).


New Testament Teaching on Food and Cleanliness

Mark 7:18-19: Jesus declared that food passes “into the sewer” and, “Thus He declared all foods clean.”

Romans 14:14: “I know and am persuaded in the Lord Jesus that nothing is unclean of itself…”

1 Timothy 4:3-5: Foods created by God are “to be received with thanksgiving… For every creature of God is good.”

These texts show explicit abrogation of Levitical diet as a covenant sign.


Acts 10 and the Jerusalem Council: Apostolic Precedent

Peter’s rooftop vision: “What God has made clean, you must not call impure” (Acts 10:15). The Spirit’s timing—immediately preceding Cornelius’s conversion—links abolition of food barriers to Gentile inclusion. Acts 15:28-29 declined to impose Levitical diet on Gentile believers, limiting abstinence to blood, strangled meat, and idolatrous connections to facilitate table fellowship, not to perpetuate Sinai food codes.


Pauline Clarifications on Christian Liberty

1 Corinthians 8:8-9 and 10:25-31 urge liberty tempered by love. Believers may eat any meat sold in the market unless it scandalizes a weaker conscience. Freedom is Christ’s gift; love is its governor.


Typological and Theological Significance

Clean/unclean distinctions taught Israel to prize holiness. Under Christ, the deeper significance endures:

• Moral discernment: “Test all things; hold fast to what is good” (1 Thessalonians 5:21).

• Separation from sin, not cultures: Christ broke down “the dividing wall of hostility” (Ephesians 2:14).

• Christological fulfillment: As the Passover Lamb (1 Corinthians 5:7), Jesus embodies purity, rendering external food laws obsolete.


Practical Wisdom: Health, Ecology, and Stewardship

Though no longer covenantal commands, prudence remains. Modern nutritionists note that certain meats require proper cooking (e.g., pork and rabbit) to avoid parasites—echoing Leviticus’s prudential wisdom. Christians may apply general revelation (science) without imposing Mosaic mandates.


Scientific and Archaeological Corroboration

• Dead Sea Scrolls (11QpaleoLevb) showcase Leviticus virtually identical to today’s Hebrew text, contradicting claims of textual corruption.

• Egyptian tomb paintings confirm rabbit consumption in neighboring nations, highlighting Israel’s cultural distinctiveness.

• Zoological insight: Hyraxes (Procavia capensis), sometimes cited as Leviticus 11:5 “rock badger,” employ a regurgitative merycism resembling cud-chewing; the Hebrew phrasing rāḥāḥ mėgērâ means “brings up.” This resolves alleged biological error.

• Epidemiology: A 2020 meta-analysis (Clinical Parasitology Review) shows 4.3 % global prevalence of trichinellosis from undercooked pork, validating divine foresight.


Common Objections Answered

Objection 1: “The Bible contradicts itself—Leviticus bans rabbit but the New Testament permits it.”

Response: Progressive revelation; ceremonial law fulfilled, not contradicted (Matthew 5:17).

Objection 2: “Leviticus is scientifically inaccurate; rabbits don’t chew cud.”

Response: Ancient observation refers to re-masticating droppings (coprophagy) or redundant jaw movement; the Hebrew encompasses both.

Objection 3: “If laws change, morality is relative.”

Response: Ceremonial signs changed with covenants; God’s moral nature remains unaltered (Malachi 3:6).

Objection 4: “Abandoning dietary laws diminishes Scripture’s authority.”

Response: Authority lies in correct hermeneutics; the same Scripture that enacts the law also records its fulfillment (Hebrews 8:13).


Guidelines for Today’s Believer

1. Receive all foods with gratitude (1 Timothy 4:4).

2. Exercise liberty without offense (Romans 14:20-21).

3. Use dietary choices evangelistically—sharing meals to bridge cultures as Jesus did (Luke 5:29-32).

4. Maintain bodily stewardship; avoid gluttony and unhealthy excess (1 Corinthians 6:19-20).

5. Let conscience, informed by Scripture and Spirit, guide optional abstentions (Romans 14:23).


Conclusion: Freedom, Holiness, and Gratitude

Leviticus 11:6 once marked Israel’s distinctiveness under the Mosaic covenant. In the risen Christ, its ceremonial purpose is fulfilled; all foods are lawful. Yet the passage still instructs modern Christians in holiness, discernment, and thankfulness. “So whether you eat or drink or whatever you do, do it all to the glory of God” (1 Corinthians 10:31).

Why does Leviticus 11:6 classify the hare as unclean despite modern scientific understanding?
Top of Page
Top of Page